AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Properties of TEMPO Oxidized Cellulose Film for the Flexible Substrate of Solar Cell

Changmei LinHui ZhangQidu DengLiulian HuangXiaojuan Ma( )Shilin Cao( )
College of Materials Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350002, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The 2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidized cellulose film (TOCF) has been attempted to be used as a substrate in electronic and optoelectronic devices, but the changes in the TOCF properties before and after annealing treatment have usually been neglected during device fabrication. In this study, TOCF was treated in different atmospheres (air, vacuum, and N2) and at different temperatures, and the properties were investigated. The results indicate that the optical properties are slightly affected by atmosphere and temperature; only slight transmittance loss and haze increase have been observed when TOCF is exposed to an air atmosphere at temperatures of above 120℃. In contrast to the slight effects on the optical properties, cellulose degradation and a loss of film strength have been observed regardless of the atmosphere used when placed at temperatures of above 100℃. Specifically, TOCF was exposed to air, followed by N2 and vacuum atmospheres. Additional Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) results showed that increasing the temperature had no significant effect on the structure of TOCF. Therefore, the annealing temperature should be controlled at a temperature of lower than 100℃ and a vacuum atmosphere is preferred.

References

[1]

Duan L, Elumalai N K, Zhang Y, Uddin A. Progress in nonfullerene acceptor based organic solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2019, 193, 22-65.

[2]

Kumavat P P, Sonar P, Dalal D S. An overview on basics of organic and dye sensitized solar cells, their mechanism and recent improvements. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78, 1262-1287.

[3]

Wang J, Zhan X. Rylene Diimide Electron Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells. Trends in Chemistry, 2019, 1(9), 869-881.

[4]

Liu Y, Hu C, Wu J, Islam A, Ouyang X. Carboxy cellulose as cathode interfacial layer for efficient organic solar cells. Paper and Biomaterials, 2020, 5(1), 14-21.

[5]

Li H, Huang J, Li J, Chen L, Zheng Q. Cellulose-based UVB-shielding film with high visible transparency. Paper and Biomaterials, 2020, 5(1), 33-42.

[6]

Ummartyotin S, Juntaro J, Sainb M, Manuspiya H. Development of transparent bacterial cellulose nanocomposite film as substrate for flexible organic light emitting diode (OLED) display. Industrial Crops and Products, 2012, 35(1), 92-97.

[7]

Hu L, Zheng G, Yao J, Liu N, Weil B, Eskilsson M, Karabulut E, Ruan Z, Fan S, Bloking J T, et al. Transparent and conductive paper from nanocellulose fibers. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6, 513-518.

[8]

Zhou Y, Fuentes-Hernandez C, Khan T M, Liu J C, Hsu J, Shim J W, Dindar A, Youngblood J P, Moon R J, Kippelen B. Recyclable organic solar cells on cellulose nanocrystal substrates. Scientific Reports, 2013, DOI: 10.1038/srep01536.

[9]

Berginski M, Hüpkes J, Schulte M, Schöpe G, Stiebig H, Rech B. The effect of front ZnO: Al surface texture and optical transparency on efficient light trapping in silicon thin-film solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, DOI: 10.1063/1.2715554

[10]

Chiba Y, Islam A, Watanabe Y, Komiya R, Koide N, Han L. Dye-Sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 45, L638-L640.

[11]

Smith P F, Chun I, Liu G, Dimitfuevich D, Rasburn J, Vancso G J. Studies of optical haze and surface morphology of blown polyethylene films using atomic force microscopy. Polymer Engineering and Science, 1996, 36, 2129-2134.

[12]

Zhu H, Parvinian S, Preston C, Vaaland O, Ruan Z, Hu L. Transparent nanopaper with tailored optical properties. Nanoscale, 2013, DOI: 10.1039/c3nr00520h.

[13]

Hongsingthong A, Krajangsang T, Yunaz I A, Miyajima S, Konagai M. ZnO films with very high haze value for use as front transparent conductive oxide films in thin-film silicon solar cells. Applied Physics Express, 2010, DOI: 10.1143/apex.3.051102.

[14]

Preston C, Xu Y, Han X, Munday J N, Hu L. Optical haze of transparent and conductive silver nanowire films. Nano Research, 2013, 6(7), 461-468.

[15]

Shah A V, Vaněček M, Meier J, Meillaud F, Guillet J, Fischer D, Droz C, Niquille X, Faÿ S, Vallat-Sauvain E, et al. Basic efficiency limits, recent experimental results and novel light-trapping schemes in a-Si: H, μc-Si: H and 'micromorph tandem' solar cells. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2004, DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.074.

[16]

Fang Z, Zhu H, Yuan Y, Ha D, Zhu S, Preston C, Chen Q, Li Y, Han X, Lee S, et al. Novel nanostructured paper with ultrahigh transparency and ultrahigh haze for solar cells. Nano Letters, 2014, 14, 765-773.

[17]

Jia C, Li T, Chen C, Dai J, Kierzewski I M, Song J, Li Y, Yang C, Wang C, Hu L. Scalable, anisotropic transparent paper directly from wood for light management in solar cells. Nano Energy, 2017, 36, 366-373.

[18]

Costa S V, Pingel P, Janietz S, Nogueira A F. Inverted organic solar cells using nanocellulose as substrate. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2016, DOI: 10.1002/app.43679.

[19]

Nogi M, Karakawa M, Komoda N, Yagyu H, Nge T T. Transparent conductive nanofiber paper for foldable solar cells. Scientific Reports, 2015, DOI: 10.1038/srep17254.

[20]

Halbich M U, Zielke D, Gogolin R, Sauer-Stieglitz R, Lövenich W, Schmidt J. Improved surface passivation and reduced parasitic absorption in PEDOT: PSS/c-Si heterojunction solar cells through the admixture of sorbitol. Scientific Reports, 2019, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46280-y.

[21]

Hu W, Xu C Y, Niu L B, Elseman A M, Wang G, Liu D B, Yao Y Q, Liao L P, Zhou G D, Song Q L. High Open-Circuit Voltage of 1.134 V for Inverted planar perovskite solar cells with sodium citrate-doped PEDOT: PSS as a hole transport layer. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11, 22021-22027.

[22]

Zhang R, Ling H, Lu X, Xia J. The facile modification of PEDOT: PSS buffer layer by polyethyleneglycol and their effects on inverted perovskite solar cell. Solar Energy, 2019, 186, 398-403.

[23]

Lin C, Zeng T, Wang Q, Huang L, Ni Y, Huang F, Ma X, Cao S. Effects of the conditions of the TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO system on carboxyl group, degree of polymerization, and yield of the oxidized cellulose. Bioresources, 2018, 13, 5965-5975.

[24]

Lin C, Wang Q, Deng Q, Huang H, Huang F, Huang L, Ni Y, Chen L, Cao S, Ma X. Preparation of highly hazy transparent cellulose film from dissolving pulp. Cellulose, 2019, 26, 4061-4069.

[25]

Saito T, Okita Y, Nge T T, Sugiyama J, Isogai A. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose: microscopic analysis of fibrous fractions in the oxidized products. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2006, 65(4), 435-440.

[26]

Saito T, Yanagisawa M, Isogai A. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose: SEC-MALLS analysis of water-soluble and -insoluble fractions in the oxidized products. Cellulose, 2005, 12, 305-315.

[27]

Ahn K, Zaccaron S, Zwirchmayr N S, Hettegger H, Hofinger A, Bacher M, Henniges U, Hosoya T, Potthast A, Rosenau T. Yellowing and brightness reversion of celluloses: CO or COOH, who is the culprit? Cellulose, 2019, 26, 429-444.

[28]

Loureiro P E G, Fernandes A J S, Furtado F P, Carvalho M G V S, Evtuguin D V. UV-resonance Raman microspectroscopy to assess residual chromophores in cellulosic pulps. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2011, 42, 1039-1045.

[29]

Saariaho A M, Argyropoulos D S, Jääskeläinen A S, Vuorinen T. Development of the partial least squares models for the interpretation of the UV resonance raman spectra of lignin model compounds. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2005, 37, 111-121.

[30]

Yao Y, Tao J, Zou J, Zhang B, Li T, Dai J, Zhu M, Wang S, Fu K K, Henderson D, et al. Light management in plasticpaper hybrid substrate towards high-performance optoelectronics. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9, 2278-2285.

[31]

Hu L, Kim H, Lee J, Peumans P, Cui Y. Scalable coating and properties of transparent, flexible, silver nanowire electrodes. ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 2955-2963.

[32]

Reineke S, Lindner F, Schwartz G, Seidler N, Walzer K, Lüssem B, Leo K. White organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent tube efficiency. Nature, 2009, 459, 234-238.

[33]

Zhu H, Xiao Z, Liu D, Li Y. Weadock N, Fang Z, Huang J, Hu L. Biodegradable transparent substrates for flexible organic-light-emitting diodes. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, DOI: 10.1039/C3EE40492G.

[34]

Rozenberga L, Skute M, Belkova L, Sable I, Vikele L, Semjonovs P, Saka M, Ruklisha M, Paegle L. Characterisation of films and nanopaper obtained from cellulose synthesised by acetic acid bacteria. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016, 144, 33-40.

[35]

Xia G, Wan J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Xu L, Wu J, He J, Zhang J. Cellulose-based films prepared directly from waste newspapers via an ionic liquid. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016, 151, 223-229.

[36]

Scheirs J, Camino G, Tumiatti W. Overview of water evolution during the thermal degradation of cellulose. European Polymer Journal, 2001, 37(5), 933-942.

[37]

Cao X, Ding B, Yu J, Al-Deyab S S. Cellulose nanowhiskers extracted from TEMPO-oxidized jute fibers. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2012, 90(2), 1075-1080.

[38]

Soni B, Hassan E B, Mahmoud B. Chemical isolation and characterization of different cellulose nanofibers from cotton stalks. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015, 134, 581-589.

[39]

Peng Y, Gardner D J, Han Y, Kiziltas A, Cai Z, Tshabalala M A. Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose Ⅰ: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose, 2013, 20(5), 2379-2392.

[40]

Rubentheren V, Ward T A, Chee C Y, Nair P, Salami E, Fearday C. Effects of heat treatment on chitosan nanocomposite film reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose and tannic acid. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016, 140, 202-208.

[41]

Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A. Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10(1), 162-165.

[42]

Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A. Thermal stabilization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2010, 95, 1502-1508.

[43]

Kasai W, Morooka T, Ek M. Mechanical properties of films made from dialcohol cellulose prepared by homogeneous periodate oxidation. Cellulose, 2014, 21(1), 769-776.

[44]

Wu B, Geng B, Chen Y, Liu H, Li G, Wu Q. Preparation and characteristics of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils from bamboo pulp and their oxygen-barrier application in PLA films. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(4), 554-563.

[45]

Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale, 2011, 3(1), 71-85.

Paper and Biomaterials
Pages 51-61
Cite this article:
Lin C, Zhang H, Deng Q, et al. Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Properties of TEMPO Oxidized Cellulose Film for the Flexible Substrate of Solar Cell. Paper and Biomaterials, 2020, 5(3): 51-61. https://doi.org/10.12103/j.issn.2096-2355.2020.03.005

774

Views

10

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 12 April 2020
Accepted: 25 May 2020
Published: 15 July 2020
© 2020 Paper and Biomaterials

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Return