AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Paper and Biomaterials Article
PDF (2.9 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Different Kinds of Microfibrillated Cellulose as Coating Layers Providing Fiber-based Barrier Properties

Ruijuan Zhang1,2, Yanqun Su1,2( ), Jingang Liu1,2
China National Pulp and Paper Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100102, China
National Engineering Lab for Pulp and Paper, Beijing, 100102, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the barrier properties of different kinds of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) coating layers. The air, oxygen, and water vapor permeability, as well as the water contact angles (WCA), were measured to quantify the barrier efficacy of the applied coatings. The WCA data showed that the surfaces of MFC-coated cardboards are more hydrophilic than those of uncoated cardboards. However, different MFC coatings realize different oxygen transmission rates (OTRs) and water vapor transmission rates (WVTRs). The MFC coating derived from bleached bamboo pulp subjected to carboxyethylation pretreatment (MFCCBP) gave the best oxygen and water vapor barrier performances. The OTR of the virgin cardboard (> 16500 cm3/(m2·24 h)) decreased to 4638 cm3/(m2·24 h) after coating with the MFCCBP. The WVTR similarly decreased from 1016.7 g/(m2·24 h) to 603.2 g/(m2·24 h).

Keywords

microfibrillated cellulosecoating performancesurface propertiesbarrier properties

References

[1]

Lavoine N, Desloges I, Khelifi B, Bras J. Impact of different coating processes of microfibrillated cellulose on the mechanical and barrier properties of paper. Journal of Materials Science, 2014, 49(7), 2879-2893.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]

Ferrer A, Pal L, Hubbe M. Nanocellulose in packaging: Advances in barrier layer technologies. Industrial Crops & Products, 2017, 95, 574-582.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]

Bharimalla A K, Deshmukh S P, Vigneshwaran N, Patil P G, Prasad V. Nanocellulose-polymer Composites for Applications in Food Packaging: Current Status, Future Prospects and Challenges. Journal of Macromolecular Science Part D Reviews in Polymer Processing, 2017, 56(8), 805-823.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

Abdul Khalil H P S, Davoudpour Y, Saurabh C K, Hossain Md S, Adnan A S, Dungani R, Paridah M T, Islam Sarker Md Z, Fazita M R N, Syakir M I, et al. A review on nanocellulosic fibres as new material for sustainable packaging: Process and applications. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 64, 823-836.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]

Lindström T, Aulin C. Market and technical challenges and opportunities in the area of innovative new materials and composites based on nanocellulosics. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 29(4), 345-351.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]

Herrick F W, Casebier R L, Hamilton J K, Sandberg K R. Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp, 1983, 37(9), 797-813.
Google Scholar
[7]

Nair S S, Zhu J Y, Deng Y, Ragauskas A J. High performance green barriers based on nanocellulose. Sustainable Chemical Processes, 2014, 2(1), 1-7.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

Zhai J Q. Nanocellulose in packaging: advances in diaphragm barrier technology. Printing Quality & Standardization, 2017(4), 13-16.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

Liu R, Lu P, Wu M, Huang C. Application Progress of Nano-cellulose in Gas Barrier Packaging Materials. Packaging Engineering, 2019, 40(7), 51-59.
Google Scholar
[10]

Kumar V, Elfving A, Koivula H M, bousfield D, Toivakka M. Roll-to-Roll Processed Cellulose Nanofiber Coatings. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55 (12), 3603-3613.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

Gicquel E, Martin C, Garrido Yanez J, Bras J. Cellulose nanocrystals as new bio-based coating layer for improving fiber-based mechanical and barrier properties. Journal of Materials Science, 2016, 52(6), 3048-3061.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]

Hult E L, Iotti M, Lenes M. Efficient approach to high barrier packaging using microfibrillar cellulose and shellac. Cellulose, 2010, 17(3), 575-586.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]

Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S. Steric Stabilization of a Cellulose Microcrystal Suspension by Poly(ethylene glycol) Grafting. Langmuir, 2001, 17(1), 21-27.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]

Kangas H, Lahtinen P, Sneck A, Saariaho A-M, Laitinen O, Hellen E. Characterization of Fibrillated Celluloses. A Short Review and Evaluation of Characteristics with a Combination of Methods. Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal, 2014, 29(1), 129-143.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]

Xu Y, Kuang Y, Johannes S P, Chen G. The Influence of Nano-fibrillated Cellulose as a Coating Component in Paper Coating. BioResources, 2016, 11(2), 4342-4352.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]

Hui Y. The Studies on Rheological Properties of Biodegradable Polyester Materials and the Processing and Properties of Its Film. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2015.
[17]

Yang J S, ChenS B, Fang Y. Effect of Surfactants on the Shear Viscosity of Dilute Aqueous Solutions of Sodium Alginate. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 2009, 25(4), 752-756.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]

Kisonen V, Prakobna K, Xu C, Salminen A, Mikkonen K S, Valtakari D, Eklund P, Seppälä J, Tenkanen M, Willför S. Composite Films of Nanofibrillated Cellulose and O-acetyl Galactoglucomannan (GGM) Coated with Succinic Esters of GGM Showing Potential as Barrier Material in Food Packaging. Journal of Materials Science, 2015, 50(8), 3189-3199.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]

Wenzel T, Robert N. Surface Roughness and Contact Angle. Journal of Physical & Colloid Chemistry, 1949, 53 (9), 1466-1467.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]

Ting W X, Liang S W, Yong L Z, Wang Z G, Wu X L, Xu J. The Influences of Surface Roughness on the Water Contact Angle for Coated Substrate with F-DLC. Key Engineering Materials, 2018, 764, 68-77.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]

Wu B, Geng B, Chen Y, Liu H, Li G, Wu Q. Preparation and Characteristics of TEMPO-oxidized Cellulose Nanofibrils from Bamboo Pulp and Their Oxygen-barrier Application in PLA Films. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(4), 554-563.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]

Hubbe M A, Ferrer A, Preeti T, Yin Y, Salas C, Pal L, Rojas O. Nanocellulose in Thin Films, Coatings, and Plies for Packaging Applications: A Review. BioResources, 2017, 12 (1), 2143-2233.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]

Syverud K, Stenius P. Strength and Barrier Properties of MFC Films. Cellulose, 2009, 16(1), 75-85.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]

Kumar V, Bollström R, Yang A, Chen Q, Chen G, Salminen P, Bousfield D, Toivakka M. Comparison of Nano and Microfibrillated Cellulose Films. Cellulose, 2014, 21(5), 3443-3456.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]

Spence K L, Venditti R A, Rojas O J, Habibi Y, Pawlak J J. The Effect of Chemical Composition on Microfibrillar Cellulose Films from Wood Pulps: Water Interactions and Physical Properties for Packaging Applications. Cellulose, 2010, 17(4), 835-848.
Crossref Google Scholar
Paper and Biomaterials
Volume 6 Issue 1,
January 2021
Pages 33-40
DOI: 10.12103/j.issn.2096-2355.2021.01.004
Cite this article:
Zhang R, Su Y, Liu J. Different Kinds of Microfibrillated Cellulose as Coating Layers Providing Fiber-based Barrier Properties. Paper and Biomaterials, 2021, 6(1): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.12103/j.issn.2096-2355.2021.01.004

718

Views

72

Downloads

0

Crossref

5

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 28 September 2020
Accepted: 22 October 2020
Published: 25 January 2021
© 2021 Paper and Biomaterials

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Return