La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3−δ (LSCM) is an attractive candidate for perovskite-type anode of SOFC, in which hydrocarbon can be used directly as fuel. However, the poor electrochemical performance limits its practical applications. LSCM nanorods with aspect ratios of 20–40 were prepared by using a sol-gel method combined with electrostatic spinning process, which were subsequently used to form LSCM-GDC composite anode, in order to optimize microstructure and improve performance of the electrode. It was found that the LSCM nanorods tended to be single perovskite phase, as compared with the LSCM powders prepared by sol-gel method. Also, LSCM nanorods showed stronger resistance to agglomeration during the sintering process. By using LSCM nanorods, the porosity of the anode of LSCM-GDCǁYSZǁLSM-YSZ button cells was 50% higher than that of the one made of LSCM powder. The button cells were tested using 97%H2+3%H2O as fuel at 850 ℃, with maximum power density of 195.1 mW·cm−2 and polarization impedance of 0.31 Ω·cm2. In comparison, the values were 174.4 mW·cm−2 and 0.31 Ω·cm2 for the anode of LSCM powder.
YU J F, LUO L H, CHENG L, et al. Journal of Ceramics, 2020, 41(5): 613–626.
KLEITZ M, PETITBON F. Optimized SOFC electrode microstructure [J]. Solid State Ionics, 1996, 92(1/2): 65–74.
FU C S, YAN D, JIA L C, et al. Journal of Ceramics, 2020, 41(6): 869–879.
ARUNA S T, BALAJI L S, KUMAR S S, et al. Electrospinning in solid oxide fuel cells—A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 67: 673–682.
LEE J G, PARK J H, SHUL Y G. Tailoring gadolinium-doped ceria-based solid oxide fuel cells to achieve 2 W·cm−2 at 550 ℃ [J]. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 4045.
AHN M, LEE J, LEE W. Nanofiber-based composite cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 353:176–182.
AHN M, CHO J, LEE W. One-step fabrication of composite nanofibers for solid oxide fuel cell electrodes [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 434: 226749.
TAO S, IRVINE J T S, PLINT S M. Methane oxidation at redox stable fuel cell electrode La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3−δ [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(43): 21771–21776.
ZHENG Y F, ZHOU J, ZHANG L, et al. High-temperature electrolysis of simulated flue gas in solid oxide electrolysis cells [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 280: 206–215.
JUNG I, LEE D, LEE S O, et al. LSCM-YSZ nanocomposites for a high performance SOFC anode [J]. Ceramics International, 2013, 39(8): 9753–9758.
HE J F, WU P J, GUAN W X, et al. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering, 2018, 9(5): 33–36.
GONG J Y, WU P C, BAI Z C, et al. Insight into the electrospinning process for SOFC cathode nanofibers [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2021, 125(13): 7044–7053.
BHARDWAJ N, KUNDU S C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique [J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2010, 28(3): 325–347.
CHEN Y, BU Y F, ZHANG Y X, et al. A highly efficient and robust nanofiber cathode for solid oxide fuel cells [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(6): 1601890.
ZHI M, LEE S, MILLER N, et al. An intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell with electrospun nanofiber cathode [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(5): 7066–7071.
HE S C, CHEN H, LI R F, et al. Effect of Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 interlayer on the electrochemical performance of La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3−δ-Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 composite anodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 253: 187–192.
DELEEBEECK L, FOURNIER J L, BIRSS V. Comparison of Sr-doped and Sr-free La1−xSrxMn0.5Cr0.5O3±δ SOFC anodes [J]. Solid State Ionics, 2010, 181(25/26): 1229–1237.
MAIER J. Transport in electroceramics: Micro- and nano-structural aspects [J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2004, 24(6): 1251–1257.
MAIER J. Nano-sized mixed conductors (Aspects of nano-ionics. Part Ⅲ) [J]. Solid State Ionics, 2002, 148(3/4): 367–374.