AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
In geosynthetic reinforced soil engineering, the interaction between reinforcement and soil can be effectively enhanced by the use of geosynthetics with additional structures and the setting of coarse-grained soil layers. However, the determination method of the thickness of coarse-grained soil layer is still unclear. In this paper, based on the results of direct shear tests on the high resistance hyperstatic geogrids (HRHG) designed with convex nodes and gravel, a constitutive model of dilatancy at the geogrid-gravel interface under shear hardening condition is established, and the distribution of the additional stress induced by dilatancy in reinforced soil is further investigated. By conducting direct shear tests under different normal pressures (30, 50, 80 kPa). The effects of different coarse-grained soil layer thicknesses (60, 100, 140, 180 mm) on the interaction between reinforcement and soil are evaluated, and the dilatancy distribution at the interface between reinforcement and soil is also compared and analyzed. The results show that the established constitutive model for geogrid-gravel interfacial dilatancy agreed well with direct shear test results, suggesting that it can effectively calculate the shear shrinkage and dilatancy, and the final dilatancy decreases with the increase of normal pressure. The additional stress in coarse-grained soil layer induced by interfacial dilatancy decreases with increasing distance from the geogrid-gravel interfaces, but the scope of dilatancy increases gradually. The increase of the thickness of coarse-grained soil layer can effectively improve the interfacial shear strength, but there exists an optimal layer thickness, which rapidly reduces the increase of interfacial shear strength. The optimal layer thickness decreases with the increment of normal pressare. Through the comparative analysis of the optimal layer thickness and dilatancy ratio, a semi-empirical formula for determining the optimal layer thickness based on the modified dilatancy constitutive model is put forward, which can provide a reference for the design and application of HRHG in practical engineering.
LIU H. Nonlinear elastic analysis of reinforcement loads for vertical reinforced soil composites without facing restriction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(6): 04016013.
LUO Zhao-gang, DING Xuan-ming, OU Qiang, et al. Experimental study on strength and deformation characteristics of coral sand reinforced by geogrid[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1053−1064.
ZHOU M, LIU H, CHEN Y, et al. First application of cast-in-place concrete large-diameter pipe (PCC) pile-reinforced railway foundation: a field study[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(4): 708−716.
WANG Li-yan, JI Wen-wei, TAO Yun-xiang, et al. Experimental study on seismic performances of geogrid striped-reinforced waste tire-faced retaining walls[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 931−940.
YU Y, BATHURST R J, ALLEN T M, et al. Physical and numerical modelling of a geogrid-reinforced incremental concrete panel retaining wall[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(12): 1883−1901.
JIN Qing, WANG Yi-lin, CUI Xin-zhuang, et al. Study on deformation behaviour of geobelt in weathered rock material-tire shred lightweight soil under pullout condition[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 408−418.
JIN Qing, WANG Yi-lin, CUI Xin-zhuang, et al. Performance testing of reinforced retaining walls filled with tire-derived aggregate mixtures using sensor-enabled geogrids[J]. China Journal of Highway Transportation, 2020, 33(9): 12−21.
CUI X Z, WANG Y L, LIU K W, et al. Strain softening model evaluating geobelt-cley interaction validated by laboratory tests of sensor-enabled geobelts[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2020, 57(3): 354−365.
CUI X Z, WANG Y L, LIU K W, et al. A simplified model for evaluating the hardening behaviour of sensor-enabled geobelts during pullout tests[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2019, 47: 377−388.
CHOUDHARY A K, KRISHNA A M. Experimental investigation of interface behaviour of different types of granular soil/geosynthetics[J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2016, 2(1): 4.
LI Lei, ZHANG Meng-xi, ZHOU Xiao-feng, et al. Pullout tests of biaxial geogrid with strengthening nodes[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2012, 43(12): 1494-1499.
WANG Rui, WANG Shuang, PENG Da-lei. Steel-plastic tenon geogrid and its interaction characteristics with backfills[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2016, 24(3): 391−397.
LI Gui-chao, ZHANG Meng-xi. Pullout tests of biaxial geogrid with strengthening anchor pieces[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2017, 36(5): 104−111.
MOSALLANEZHAD M, TAGHAVI SHS, HATAF N, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of the performance of the new reinforcement system under pull-out conditions[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(1): 70−80.
MIRZAALIMOHAMMADI A, GHAZAVI M, ROUSTAEI M, et al. Pullout response of strengthened geosynthetic interacting with fine sand[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2019, 47(4): 530−541.
TAGHAVI S H S, MOSALLANEZHAD M. Experimental analysis of large-scale pullout tests conducted on polyester anchored geogrid reinforcement systems[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(5): 621−630.
SUKMAK K, SUKMAK P, HORPIBULSUK S, et al. Effect of fine content on the pullout resistance mechanism of bearing reinforcement embedded in cohesive-frictional soils[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015, 43(2): 107−117.
BEYRANVAND A, LAJEVARDI S H, GHAZAVI M, et al. Laboratory investigation of pullout behavior of strengthened geogrid with concrete pieces in fine sand[J]. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2021, 6(4): 207.
WANG Xie-qun, ZHANG Jun-feng, ZOU Wei-lie, et al. A shear strength model of geogrid-soil interface and its influence factors[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(4): 133−141.
BAO Cheng-gang. Study on interface behavior of geosynthetics and soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(9): 1735−1744.
CHEN R P, WANG Y W, YE X W, et al. Tensile force of geogrids embedded in pile-supported reinforced embankment: a full-scale experimental study[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(2): 157−169.
QI Tian, WANG Ya-wei, DING Guang-ya, et al. Model test and numerical analysis of sandwich-shaped reinforced retaining wall under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2021, 41(6): 1339−1349.
LIU Fei-yu, YAN Si-qi, CHEN Jiang, et al. Analysis of deforming behaviors of sandwich reinforced soil retaining wall under strip load[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2021, 41(5): 1080−1086.
ABDI M R, SADRNEJAD S A, ARJOMAND M A. Clay reinforcement using geogrid embedded in thin layers of sand[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2009, 7(4): 224−235.
LIU Fei-yu, SHI Jing, WANG Jun, et al. Dynamic shear behavior of interface for clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(6): 1991−1998.
ABDI M R, ZANDIEH A R. Experimental and numerical analysis of large scale pull out tests conducted on clays reinforced with geogrids encapsulated with coarse material[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2014, 42(5): 494−504.
CUI Xin-zhuang, WANG Yi-lin, JIANG Peng, et al. Calculation method for limit passive frictional resistance lnduced by convex nodes of hyperstatic geogrid[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(1): 27−36.
ALFARO M C, PATHAK Y P. Dilatant stresses at the interface of granular fills and geogrid strip reinforcements[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2005, 12(5): 239−252.
MIAO Chen-xi, ZHENG Jun-jie, CUI Ming-juan, et al. Study of influence of joint protuberance on geogrid reinforcement performance by discrete element method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(4): 1181−1186.
DUNCAN J M, CHANG C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 1970, 96(5): 1629−1653.
WANG Jun, LIN Xu, FU Hong-tao. Study of constitutive model of sand-geogrid interface behavior in geogrid/geotextile reinforced soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(Suppl.2): 75−84.
NAMJOO A M, JAFARI K, TOUFIGH V. Effect of particle size of sand and surface properties of reinforcement on sand-geosynthetics and sand–carbon fiber polymer interface shear behavior[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 24: 100403.
INDRARATNA B, NGO T, RUJIKIATKAMJORN C. Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29(3): 313−322.
LIU Fei-yu, LIN Xu, WANG Jun. Influence of particle-size gradation on shear behavior of geosynthetics and sand interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechenics and Engineering, 2013, 32(12): 2575−2582.
LUO Gang, ZHANG Jian-min. Improvement of Duncan-Chang nonlinear model and Shen Zhujiang’s elastoplastic model for granular soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(5): 887−890.
WANG J, YING M J, LIU F Y, et al. Experimental investigation on the stress-dilatancy response of aggregate-geogrid interface using parameterized shapes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 289.
363
Views
11
Downloads
0
Crossref
0
Web of Science
0
Scopus
0
CSCD
Altmetrics
京公网安备11010802044758号