AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Computational fluid dynamics-discrete element fluidsolid coupling analysis on suffusion in anisotropic sandy soils

Chuang ZHOU1,2,3Jian-gu QIAN1,2( )Zhen-yu YIN3
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

For the problem of suffosion in gap-graded sand with initial anisotropy, the Ganser drag force model, which can take into account the effect of the projected area of particles, is introduced to achieve a two-phase coupling of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and discrete elements method (DEM) for non-spherical particles. The applicability of the numerical method in solving the interaction between the non-spherical particles and fluid is verified by comparing with single particle settlement tests. On this basis, specimens with different bedding orientations and fine contents are further generated to simulate upward seepage suffosion tests, during which both macroscopic and microscopic properties, such as the fine loss, composition of strong and weak force chains, and changes in grain fabric, are monitored to explore the seepage suffosion characteristics of anisotropic soils with various fabrics under different filling states (underfilled and overfilled). Drained triaxial tests are carried out on specimens before and after erosion to investigate the effect of seepage on the weakening of soil strength. The results show that the mass loss of the overfilled specimens increases with increasing deposition angle, while the mass loss of the underfilled specimens firstly increases and then decreases with the deposition angle. The loss of fines in the underfilled specimens is mainly due to the low connectivity fines, whereas for the overfilled specimens, suffosion leads to a simultaneous reduction in the number of both low and high connectivity fines. In addition, the triaxial tests show that suffusion causes a significant weakening of the peak strength of the soil, and the change in peak strength with the deposition angle is also influenced by the soil filling state.

References

[1]

LUO Yu-long, ZHANG Xing-jie, ZHANG Hai-bin, et al. Review of suffusion in deep alluvium foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(11): 3094−3106.

[2]

LI Wei-yi, QIAN Jian-gu, YIN Zhen-yu, et al. Simulation of seepage erosion in gap graded sand soil using CFD-DEM[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(11): 3191−3201.

[3]

FAN Ru-yu, LUO Yu-long, ZHANG Jie-xing, et al. study on suffusion mesoscopic numerical model based on DEM-CFD method[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2021, 39(2): 64−68.

[4]

XIONG H, WU H, BAO X et al. Investigating effect of particle shape on suffusion by CFD-DEM modeling[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 289: 123043.

[5]

SHI Z M, ZHENG H C, YU S B, et al. Application of CFD-DEM to investigate seepage characteristics of landslide dam materials[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 101: 23−33.

[6]

HU Z, ZHANG Y, YANG Z. Suffusion-induced evolution of mechanical and microstructural properties of gap-graded soils using CFD-DEM[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(5): 04020024.

[7]

ZOU Y, CHEN C, ZHANG L. Simulating progression of internal erosion in gap-graded sandy gravels using coupled CFD-DEM[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(1): 04019135.

[8]

SHIRE T, O’SULLIVAN C, HANLEY K J, et al. Fabric and effective stress distribution in internally unstable soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2014, 140(12): 04014072.

[9]

LIU Y, WANG L, HONG Y, et al. A coupled CFD-DEM investigation of suffusion of gap graded soil: coupling effect of confining pressure and fines content[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2020, 44(18): 2473−2500.

[10]

ZHAO B, WANG J. 3D quantitative shape analysis on form, roundness, and compactness with μCT[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 291: 262−275.

[11]

QIAN J G, ZHOU C, YIN Z Y, et al. Investigating the effect of particle angularity on suffusion of gap-graded soil using coupled CFD-DEM[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 139: 104−383.

[12]

LIANG W, ZHAO S, WU H, et al. Bearing capacity and failure of footing on anisotropic soil: a multiscale perspective[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 137: 104279.

[13]

AHMED A A. Stochastic analysis of seepage under hydraulic structures resting on anisotropic heterogeneous soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(6): 1001−1004.

[14]

LIANG Y, YEH T J, WANG Y, et al. Numerical simulation of backward erosion piping in heterogeneous fields[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017, 53(4): 3246−3261.

[15]

GANSER G H. A rational approach to drag prediction of spherical and nonspherical particles[J]. Powder Technology, 1993, 77(2): 143−152.

[16]

KLOSS C, GONIVA C, HAGER A, et al. Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM[J]. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2012, 12(2−3): 140−152.

[17]

WANG Yin, YANG Han, PANG Zi-yi, et al. Numerical simulation of negative pressure penetration of suction anchor foundation based on CFD-DEM fluid solid coupling method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(2): 384−393.

[18]

NIAN Ting-kai, ZHANG Fang, ZHENG De-feng, et al. Numerical simulation on the movement behavior of viscous submarine landslide based on coupled computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(11): 3174−3184.

[19]

GUO Y, YANG Y, YU X. Influence of particle shape on the erodibility of non-cohesive soil: insights from coupled CFD–DEM simulations[J]. Particuology, 2018, 39: 12−24.

[20]

FANNIN R J, MOFFAT R. Observations on internal stability of cohesionless soils[J]. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(7): 497−500.

[21]

JIANG Ming-jing, ZHANG An, FU Chang, et al. Macro and micro-behaviors of anisotropy granular soils using 3D DEM simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(12): 2165−2172.

[22]

XIONG H, YIN Z Y, ZHAO J, et al. Investigating the effect of flow direction on suffusion and its impacts on gap-graded granular soils[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2020, 16(2): 399−419.

[23]

ROTHENBURG L, BATHURST R J. Analytical study of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials[J]. Geotechnique, 1989, 39(4): 601−614.

[24]

MINDLIN R D. Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1953, 20: 327−344.

[25]
VASQUEZ S. A phase coupled method for solving multiphase problems on unstructured mesh[C]//Proceedings of ASME FEDSM’00: ASME 2000 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting. Boston: [s. n.] 2000.
[26]

KE L, TAKAHASHI A. Experimental investigations on suffusion characteristics and its mechanical consequences on saturated cohesionless soil[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2014, 54(4): 713−730.

[27]

THEVANAYAGAM S, MOHAN S. Intergranular state variables and stress-strain behaviour of silty sands[J]. Geotechnique, 2000, 50(1): 1−23.

[28]

TAHA H, NGUYEN N S, MAROT D, et al. Micro-scale investigation of the role of finer grains in the behavior of bidisperse granular materials[J]. Granular Matter, 2019, 21(2): 1−17.

[29]

KEISHING J, HUANG X, HANLEY K J. Energy dissipation in soil samples during cyclic triaxial simulations[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 121(5): 421−433.

[30]

MINH N H, CHENG Y P, THORNTON C. Strong force networks in granular mixtures[J]. Granular Matter, 2014, 16(1): 69−78.

Rock and Soil Mechanics
Pages 302-312
Cite this article:
ZHOU C, QIAN J-g, YIN Z-y. Computational fluid dynamics-discrete element fluidsolid coupling analysis on suffusion in anisotropic sandy soils. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(1): 302-312. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2023.5163

323

Views

28

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 16 February 2023
Accepted: 04 May 2023
Published: 17 January 2024
© 2024 Rock and Soil Mechanics
Return