AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (342.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Viscoelastic-plastic dynamic constitutive model of cohesive soil based on triggered viscoplastic element

Cheng-bin ZHAOYa-sheng LUO( )Quan FANZhi-tian MENGZhe SUN
College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A& F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The dynamic constitutive models based on viscous, elastic, and plastic elements often suffer from poor prediction performance and fail to fully capture the viscous, elastic, and plastic characteristics of cohesive soil. To address these limitations, a viscoelastic-plastic constitutive model for cohesive soil is proposed in this study by introducing a triggered viscoplastic element (symbolized as Ψ) and considering residual deformation as a starting point. The model takes into account the phenomena of vibration stabilization and vibration decay and is validated through dynamic triaxial shear tests. This dynamic constitutive model not only describes the development pattern of residual strain in cohesive soil under dynamic loads but also provides reasonable predictions for dynamic strain development. The results indicate that the viscosity coefficient of the Ψ element decays as the vibration period increases, and this attenuation is closely related to the moisture content under dynamic loading conditions. The optimal moisture content serves as an important parameter that influences both vibration stabilization and vibration decay. When the moisture content is less than the optimal moisture content, the deformation of the sample exhibits vibration stabilization, and the change of the viscosity coefficient can be ignored. When the moisture content is greater than the optimal moisture content, the deformation of the sample exhibits vibration decay, and the change of the viscosity coefficient cannot be neglected.

References

[1]

XIE Ding-yi. Soil dynamics[M]. Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, 2004.

[2]

BISOI S, HALDRA S. 3D modeling of long-term dynamic behavior of monopile-supported offshore wind turbine in clay[J]. International Journal of Geo- mechanics, 2019, 19(7): 04019062-1-04019062-13.

[3]

JOYNER W B, CHEN A T F. Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1975, 65(5): 1315-1336.

[4]

PUZRIN A, FRYDMAN S, TALESNICK M. Effect of degradation on seismic response of Israeli continental slope[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(2): 85-93.

[5]

PUZRIN A, FRYDMAN S, TALESNICK M. Normalized nondegrading behavior of soft clay under cyclic simple shear loading[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(12): 836-843.

[6]

ALEXANDER P, SAM F, MARK T. Effect of degradation on seismic response of Israeli continental slope[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(2): 85-93.

[7]

CELAURO C, FECAROTTI C, PIRROTTA A, et al. Experimental validation of a fractional model for creep/ recovery testing of asphalt mixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 36: 458-466.

[8]

KALLIOGLOU P, TIKA T H, PITILAKIS K. Shear modulus and damping ratio of cohesive soils[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 12(6): 879-913.

[9]

YUAN Peng-bo, ZHU Lei, ZHONG Xiu-mei, et al. Experimental investigation on the dynamic characteristics of earthen site soil treated by enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3385-3392, 3415.

[10]

HU Zai-qiang, HUANG Shuai, ZHOU Heng-li, et al. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of artificial ruins under drying-wetting cycles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(Suppl.2): 3499-3507.

[11]

WANG Jia-quan, HOU Sen-lei, LIN Zhi-nan, et al. Dynamic characteristics of reinforced gravelly soil under semi-sinusoidal cyclic traffic dynamic load[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(3): 90-98.

[12]

JIN Qing, ZHENG Ying-jie, CUI Xin-zhuang, et al. Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of silt in Yellow River Flood Field after freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(7): 2113-2122.

[13]

FENG Shuang-xi, LEI Hua-yang. An elastoplastic dynamic constitutive model for saturated soft clay based on bounding surface theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 901-908.

[14]

XIONG Y, YE G, XIE Y, et al. A unified constitutive model for unsaturated soil under monotonic and cyclic loading[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2019, 14: 313-328.

[15]

CUI Kai, LI Yong-kui. Study on constitutive model of unsaturated Chuanxi talus mixed soil under cyclic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(8): 2157-2166.

[16]

LIU Wei-zheng, XU Yang, CAI Yu, et al. Dynamic response and accumulative deformation of the modified expansive soil of heavy-hual railway under wetting action[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2023, 45(2): 127-138.

[17]

WANG Jia-quan, CHANG Zhen-chao, TANG Yi, et al. Dynamic triaxial test analysis of reinforced gravel soil under cyclic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 2851-2860.

[18]

RAGOZZINO E. Seismic response of deep Quaternary sediments in historical center of L’Aquila City (central Italy)[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 87: 29-43.

[19]
SOUSA J B, WEISSMAN S L, DEACON JA, et al. Permanent deformation response of asphalt aggregate mixes[R]. Washington DC: National Research Program Council, 1994.
[20]

PENG M J, XU Z H. Research on nonlinear constitutive relationship of permanent deformation in asphalt pavements[J]. Science in China Series G: Physics Mechanics & Astronomy, 2006, 49(6): 671-682.

Rock and Soil Mechanics
Pages 502-510
Cite this article:
ZHAO C-b, LUO Y-s, FAN Q, et al. Viscoelastic-plastic dynamic constitutive model of cohesive soil based on triggered viscoplastic element. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 502-510. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2023.5311

150

Views

10

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 13 March 2023
Accepted: 28 July 2023
Published: 19 February 2024
© 2024 Rock and Soil Mechanics
Return