AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Analysis of public opinion and disaster loss estimates from typhoons based on Microblog data

Shaopan LI1Fei ZHAO2Yiqi ZHOU1Xiangliang TIAN3Hong HUANG1( )
Institute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Beijing 100124, China
Key Laboratory of Mining Goaf Disaster Prevention and Control of Ministry of Emergency Management, China Academy of Safety Science & Technology, Beijing 100012, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study searched Microblog data related to Typhoon "Mangkhut" in 2018 and "Lekima" in 2019 and then used the Bayesian sentiment analysis model to analyze the public opinions related to these typhoons. The results show two different typhoon disaster public opinion temporal and spatial evolution laws and an emotional evolution law. Then, the urban typhoon disaster loss was estimated for coastal and inland cities based on the temporal and spatial evolution and emotional evolution laws. The data includes the city's geographic location, economy, population and typhoon disaster damage as well as sentiments. The disaster damage assessment model is consistent with the disaster assessment. The research results and methods provide references for disaster research and disaster relief demand analyses and guidelines for supply allocation in cities during initial emergency responses during typhoons.

CLC number: TP311.51 Document code: A Article ID: 1000-0054(2022)01-0043-09

References

[1]

KANG B. Statistical analysis of typhoon disasters in China[J]. Flood Control and Drought Relief in China, 2016, 26(2): 36-40. (in Chinese)

[2]

China Meteorological Administration. China meteorological disaster yearbook 2019[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2019. (in Chinese)

[3]

China Meteorological Administration. China meteorological disaster yearbook 2018[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2018. (in Chinese)

[4]

China Meteorological Administration. China meteorological disaster yearbook 2017[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2017. (in Chinese)

[5]

China Meteorological Administration. China meteorological disaster yearbook 2016[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2016. (in Chinese)

[6]

CHAE J, THOM D, JANG Y, et al. Special section on visual analytics: Public behavior response analysis in disaster events utilizing visual analytics of microblog data[J]. Computers & Graphics, 2014, 38(1): 51-60.

[7]

CHEN Z, GAO T, LUO N X, et al. Social media effectiveness to reflect the spatial and temporal distribution of natural disasters[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2017, 42(8): 44-48. (in Chinese)

[8]

BAI H, LIN X G. Social media disaster event detection system based on Chinese short text classification[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2016, 31(2): 19-23. (in Chinese)

[9]

PENG M, GUAN C Y, ZHU J H, et al. A survey of topic detection and tracking technology for social media texts[J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Science Edition), 2016, 62(3): 197-217. (in Chinese)

[10]

MARK A S, ALISA E P, et al. Making the most of a brave new world: Opportunities and considerations for using Twitter as a public health monitoring tool[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2014, 63(6): 109-111.

[11]

LIU H B, ZHAI G F. A comparative study of the social response characteristics of different disasters based on social media information[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2017, 32(1): 187-193. (in Chinese)

[12]
LIU C R. Online news netizens comment on emotional orientation analysis and visualization[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
[13]

QIU P Y, LU F, ZHANG H C, at al. Containing automatic recognition methods for geo-event micro-blog messages[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2016, 18(7): 886-893. (in Chinese)

[14]

YANG T F, JIE J B, LI Z Y, et al. Identification and classification of typhoon disaster loss information in Weibo[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences, 2018, 20(7): 906-917. (in Chinese)

[15]
SAKAKI T, OKAZAKI M, MATSUO Y. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors[C]//Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA: ACM, 2010: 851-860.
[16]

KUMAR M A, GOPAL M. A comparison study on multiple binary-class SVM methods for unilabel text categorization[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2010, 31(11): 1437-1444.

[17]
ALFARRARJEH A, AGRAWAL S, KIM S H, et al. Geo-spatial multimedia sentiment in disasters[C]//The 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics 2017. Tokyo, Japan: IEEE, 2017.
[18]

XU B, GUO X, YE Y, et al. An improved random forest classifier for text categorization[J]. Journal of Computers, 2012, 7(12): 2913-2920.

[19]

CHIO S, BAE B. The real-time monitoring system of social big data for disaster management[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2015.

[20]

PETER D.T. Learning algorithms for keyphrase extraction[J]. Information Retrieval, 2000, 2(4): 303-336.

[21]
YANG T, XIE J, LI G. A social media based dataset of typhoon disasters[DB]. Science Data Bank, 2017, DOI: 10.11922/sciencedb.547.
Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology)
Pages 43-51
Cite this article:
LI S, ZHAO F, ZHOU Y, et al. Analysis of public opinion and disaster loss estimates from typhoons based on Microblog data. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(1): 43-51. https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.031

137

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

12

Scopus

10

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 09 March 2021
Published: 15 January 2022
© Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology). All rights reserved.
Return