AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Spatiotemporal rapid prediction model of urban rainstorm waterlogging based on machine learning

Xin DAIHong HUANG( )Xinyu JIWei WANG
Institute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objectiv

Rapid prediction of rainstorm waterlogging is crucial for disaster prevention and reduction. However, the traditional numerical models for simulating and predicting large-scale and complex subsurface conditions are complicated and time-consuming; moreover, the time-efficiency requirement of rainstorm waterlogging prediction is difficult to meet. To address these shortages of the numerical models, this study constructs a spatiotemporal prediction model of urban rainstorm waterlogging based on machine learning methods to rapidly predict waterlogging extent and water depth changes.

Methods

This study constructs a rapid prediction model of urban rainstorm waterlogging based on a hydrodynamics model and machine learning algorithms. First, a hydrodynamic model is constructed based on InfoWorks integrated catchment management (InfoWorks ICM) for rainstorm waterlogging in the study area with the parameter rate determination and model validation to realize the high-precision simulation of urban rainstorm waterlogging. On this basis, a rainfall scenario-driven hydraulics model is designed to further obtain rainstorm waterlogging simulation results. These results are used as the base dataset for machine learning. Second, the spatial characteristics data of rainstorm waterlogging are obtained from three aspects: rainfall situation, subsurface information, and the drainage capacity of the pipe network, which, together with the grid simulation results, comprise the dataset. The spatial prediction models are based on random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and K-nearest neighbor algorithms. Finally, the simulation results of waterlogging points are used to generate rainstorm waterlogging time series data. The rainfall, cumulative rainfall, and water depth of the first four moments (every 5 min) are used as the input for a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to predict the present water depth of the flooding point. The two models collaborate to achieve rapid spatial and temporal predictions of urban rainstorm waterlogging.

Results

For spatial predictions, the random forest model has the best fitting performance regarding evaluation indexes such as the mean square error, the mean absolute error, and the coefficient of determination (R2). When a rainstorm scenario with an 80-year event and a 2.5 h rainfall calendar prediction set is used, the prediction results concur with the risk map of urban waterlogging in Beijing. Compared with the simulation results of InfoWorks ICM, the prediction accuracy of the predicted inundation extent reaches 99.51%, and the average prediction error of waterlogging depth does not exceed 5.00% by the random forest model. For temporal predictions, the trend of the water depth change of the LSTM neural network model is more consistent with the simulation results of InfoWorks ICM, the R2 of four typical inundation points are above 0.900, the average absolute error of water depth prediction at the peak moment is 1.9 cm, and the average relative error is 4.0%.

Conclusions

When addressing sudden rainstorms, the rapid prediction model based on machine learning algorithms built in this study can generate accurate prediction results of flooding extent and water depth in seconds by simply updating the forecast rainfall data in the model input. The model computational speed is greatly improved compared to the hydrodynamics-based numerical model, which can help plan waterlogging mitigation and relief measures.

CLC number: X43 Document code: A Article ID: 1000-0054(2023)06-0865-09

References

[1]

SHU Z K, LI W X, ZHANG J Y, et al. Historical changes and future trends of extreme precipitation and high temperature in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022, 24(5): 116-125. (in Chinese)

[2]

KONG F. Response to the "7·21" heavy rain and flood disaster in Beijing in 2012 and its implications[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2022(9): 42-45. (in Chinese)

[3]

HUANG J, LI M H, KANG J L, et al. Mining and analysis of rainstorm disaster information based on social media: Case study of Shenzhen rainstorm on April 11, 2019[J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 2021, 39(2): 86-94, 98. (in Chinese)

[4]
Disaster Investigation Team of the State Council. Investigation report of "7·20" heavy rain disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan Province[R]. Beijing: Disaster Investigation Team of the State Council, 2022. (in Chinese)
[5]

XIA J, WANG H J, GAN Y Y, et al. Research progress in forecasting methods of rainstorm and flood disaster in China[J]. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 2019, 38(5): 416-421. (in Chinese)

[6]

HUANG G R, WANG X, HUANG W. Simulation of rainstorm water logging in urban area based on InfoWorks ICM model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2017, 35(2): 66-70, 60. (in Chinese)

[7]

JIN C S, DI S C, YU L, et al. Research on rapid identification technology of waterlogging risk area in central urban area of Beijing[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2022(4): 9-13. (in Chinese)

[8]
ZENG P. Application research of machine learning technology in rapid forecast of urban flood[D]. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2020. (in Chinese)
[9]

YAN J, JIN J M, CHEN F R, et al. Urban flash flood forecast using support vector machine and numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2018, 20(1): 221-231.

[10]
ZHOU Y H. Study on prediction and early warning of urban flood waterlogging process based on deep learning[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[11]

WANG H F, ZHAO Y J, ZHOU Y H, et al. Prediction of urban water accumulation points and water accumulation process based on machine learning[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2021, 14(4): 2317-2328.

[12]

KHATRI S, KOKANE P, KUMAR V, et al. Prediction of waterlogged zones under heavy rainfall conditions using machine learning and GIS tools: A case study of Mumbai[J]. GeoJournal, 2022, 87(4): 1-15.

[13]

LI H H, WU J D, WANG Q, et al. A study on rainstorm waterlogging disaster prediction models in Shanghai based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2021, 30(1): 191-200. (in Chinese)

[14]

TANG X Z, SHU Y Q, LIAN Y Q, et al. A spatial assessment of urban waterlogging risk based on a weighted naïve Bayes classifier[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630: 264-274.

[15]

BERKHAHN S, FUCHS L, NEUWEILER I. An ensemble neural network model for real-time prediction of urban floods[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 575: 743-754.

[16]

LE X H, HO H V, LEE G, et al. Application of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network for flood forecasting[J]. Water, 2019, 11(7): 1387.

[17]

HOU T Y, LIANG H, HUO K, et al. Tianjin urban water logging monitoring and early warning system based on intelligent Internet of things technology[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research and Application, 2021, 42(1): 85-89. (in Chinese)

[18]

LV H Y, FENG Q. A review of random forests algorithm[J]. Journal of the Hebei Academy of Sciences, 2019, 36(3): 37-41. (in Chinese)

[19]

PENG Y, MA L, ZHANG W J, et al. Research and application of risk forecast model based on ensemble learning[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2022, 43(4): 956-961. (in Chinese)

[20]
PAN X X, HOU J M, CHEN G Z, et al. Rapid prediction of urban inundation based on the K-nearest neighbor method and the hydrodynamic model[J/OL]. (2022-08-26)[2022-11-24]. Water Resources Conservation, 2022. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1356.TV.20220825.1710.002.html. (in Chinese)
[21]

YANG L, WU Y Q, WANG J L, et al. Research on recurrent neural network[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(S2): 1-6, 26. (in Chinese)

[22]

CHEN P, ZHANG J Q, SUN Y Y, et al. Simulation study of rainstorm water logging disaster[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2017, 35(21): 89-94. (in Chinese)

[23]
Beijing Municipal Commission of Planning and Land Resources Administration, Beijing Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. Standard of rainstorm runoff calculation for urban storm drainage system planning and design: DB11/T 969—2016[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2016. (in Chinese)
[24]

LIU Y Y, LIU Y S, ZHENG J W, et al. Intelligent rapid prediction method of urban flooding based on BP neural network and numerical simulation model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(3): 284-295. (in Chinese)

[25]

Beijing Institute of Water Science and Technology. Beijing releases the first urban waterlogging risk map[J]. Beijing Water, 2022(5): I0010. (in Chinese)

[26]
LÜ J. Study on gradient boosting decision tree and its improvement: An hybrid model and its application[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017. (in Chinese)
Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology)
Pages 865-873
Cite this article:
DAI X, HUANG H, JI X, et al. Spatiotemporal rapid prediction model of urban rainstorm waterlogging based on machine learning. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63(6): 865-873. https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.22.013

142

Views

5

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 28 November 2022
Published: 15 June 2023
© Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology). All rights reserved.
Return