AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Autonomous target asteroid search strategy using optical camera

Shuo MU1Hui LIU2Jialong SONG1Ning HAN2Yaowu DUAN2Shuxuan LIU2Hexi BAOYIN1( )
School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Beijing Institute of Control & Electronic Technology, Beijing 100038, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

Asteroid research has become a focal point of scientific inquiry in recent years. These celestial bodies have drawn significant scientific and economic interest and pose a potential threat to the Earth's safety. This study addressed the challenges in tracking and analyzing small asteroids or those with limited observational data. These asteroids often have significant errors in their ephemeris information, which makes it difficult for impactors to capture them accurately using only these data. The challenge is compounded when the asteroid remains outside the camera's field of view after adjustments based on the ephemeris positions. Therefore, an efficient and rapid search strategy must be adopted to adjust the camera's direction, ensuring that the asteroid is viewed.

Methods

This research is based on China's inaugural asteroid impact mission. The focus is on the final-stage target search strategies for asteroids with small diameters but significant orbit determination errors, employing optical cameras. A critical challenge in this mission is the high relative speed between the impactor and the target asteroid. This speed necessitates the completion of the entire approach and final impact within approximately 4 000 s. Thus, the search strategy must be time-efficient to fit within these strict temporal constraints. Moreover, the camera used in this mission has certain operational limitations due to the parameters involved. For example, a camera cannot capture images during impactor maneuvering. Furthermore, the captured images must be processed autonomously by the impactor's onboard computer to facilitate autonomous navigation. The camera must operate under the principle of minimal imaging, constrained by the requirement of adequate coverage area to minimize the computational load on the onboard computer and reduce the overall search time. To address these operational challenges, a scanning search strategy is designed to maximize the area covered by each imaging instance. This strategy is developed by considering two critical constraints. First, the total search duration must be less than one-tenth of the entire approach phase, which translates to less than 400 s. Second, the imaging interval must be greater than 0.5 s. The proposed strategy can effectively cover target areas of varying sizes by adjusting the number of searches. This study provides a detailed analytical expression for the achievable area coverage with varying numbers of searches. In addition, a method for recursive calculation is proposed for different field-of-view positions. This methodology is crucial to ensure the adaptability and efficiency of the search strategy in real-time scenarios. Numerical simulation techniques are applied to validate the effectiveness of the proposed search strategy. These simulations are critical for testing the strategy under various conditions and assessing its feasibility and reliability.

Results

The results of these simulations were highly encouraging. The search strategy achieved a 100% success rate, with a maximum duration of 356.2 s and an average duration of 98.3 s. The shortest duration recorded for a single search was approximately 1.5 s.

Conclusions

These results are particularly noteworthy because they demonstrate the strategy's compatibility with the performance of the camera, the computational power of the onboard computer, and maneuvering time constraints.

CLC number: TH113.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1000-0054(2024)09-1555-10

References

[1]

ANTHONY N, EMAMI M R. Asteroid engineering: The state-of-the-art of near-Earth asteroids science and technology[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2018, 100: 1-17.

[2]

CHENG B, ASPHAUG E, YU Y, et al. Measuring the mechanical properties of small body regolith layers using a granular penetrometer[J]. Astrodynamics, 2023, 7(1): 15-29.

[3]
CASTILLO-ROGEZ J C, PAVONE M, HOFFMAN J A, et al. Expected science return of spatially-extended in-situ exploration at small Solar system bodies[C]// Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Sky, USA: IEEE, 2012: 1-15.
[4]

ZHANG Y, MICHEL P. Shapes, structures, and evolution of small bodies[J]. Astrodynamics, 2021, 5(4): 293-329.

[5]
ZACNY K, COHEN M M, JAMES W W, et al. Asteroid mining[C]// AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition. San Diego, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013.
[6]

TANG Y H, WU W R, LI M T, et al. Near-Earth asteroids observation system in cislunar space[J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2022, 52(7): 1169-1185. (in Chinese)

[7]

BROWN P G, ASSINK J D, ASTIZ L, et al. A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors[J]. Nature, 2013, 503(7475): 238-241.

[8]

MICHELI M, WAINSCOAT R J, DENNEAU L. Detectability of Chelyabinsk-like impactors with Pan-STARRS[J]. Icarus, 2018, 303: 265-272.

[9]

JIAO Y F, CHENG B, BAOYIN H X. Optimal kinetic-impact geometry for asteroid deflection exploiting delta-V hodograph[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2023, 46(2): 382-389.

[10]

BUS S J, BINZEL R P. Phase Ⅱ of the small main-belt asteroid spectroscopic survey: A feature-based taxonomy[J]. Icarus, 2002, 158(1): 146-177.

[11]

WATANABE S, HIRABAYASHI M, HIRATA N, et al. Hayabusa2 arrives at the carbonaceous asteroid 162173 Ryugu: A spinning top-shaped rubble pile[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 268-272.

[12]

RIVKIN A S, CHABOT N L, STICKLE A M, et al. The double asteroid redirection test (DART): Planetary defense investigations and requirements[J]. The Planetary Science Journal, 2021, 2(5): 173.

[13]
DENG X C, FAN A Q. China marks 7th Space Day amid busy mission schedule[EB/OL]. (2022-04-24)[2023-10-23]. http://en.people.cn/n3/2022/0425/c90000-10088884.html.
[14]
FEDERICI L, SCORSOGLIO A, GHILARDI L, et al, Image-based meta-reinforcement learning for autonomous terminal guidance of an impactor in a binary asteroid system[C]// AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. San Diego, USA: AIAA, 2022: 2270.
[15]

HAN N, LIU H, WANG Y C, et al. Pulse guidance law for deep space impact based on the proportional guidance[J]. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2019, 17(1): 86-90. (in Chinese)

[16]
CANO J L, BASTANTE J C. Very small asteroids detection and rendezvous strategy[C]// Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics. Laurel, USA: ISSFD, 2014.
[17]

YU S Y, GAO H D, MA J, et al. Selection of acquisition scan methods in intersatellite optical communications[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers. B, 2002(5): 364-368.

[18]

FENG G Z, YANG H J, QIU Q, et al. Analyzing from simulation of optimizing the spiral scan in the laser radar system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2006, 35(2): 165-168. (in Chinese)

[19]

YOU Y, WANG H. Onboard target searching strategy during lost in space situations in angles-only navigation active space debris removal[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2019, 20(3): 815-829.

[20]

HU H L, SHANG J, YANG L, et al. Scan planning optimization for 2-D beam scanning using a future geostationary microwave radiometer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(5): 3167-3184.

[21]

ZHANG Z, E Z B, HUANG L X, et al. Semi-analytical algorithm for computing satellite-area target visibility[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(3): 573-580. (in Chinese)

[22]

E Z B, LI J F. Fast simulation algorithm for area target visibility using remote sensing satellites[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2019, 59(9): 699-704. (in Chinese)

[23]

GAN L, GONG S P. Observation mission planning for maneuverable satellite constellations towards multiple targets[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2021, 61(3): 240-247. (in Chinese)

[24]

ZHI Z, QU H S, TAO S P, et al. The design of cone and pendulum scanning mode using dual-camera with multi- dimensional motion imaging micro-nanosatellite[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(18): 4613.

[25]

BAOYIN H X, YIN M W. Review on time-optimal reorientation of agile satellites[J]. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2020, 18(4): 1-11. (in Chinese)

[26]

YU L J, JIANG F H, JIANG Y, et al. Design of agile satellite's active scanning imaging mode on general track[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2019, 28(1): 27-34. (in Chinese)

[27]

YU J, XI J J, YU L J, et al. Study of one-orbit multi-stripes splicing imaging for agile satellite[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2015, 24(2): 27-34. (in Chinese)

[28]

ZHANG D Y, GUO L, WANG Q, et al. An improved single-orbit scheduling method for agile imaging satellite towards area target[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(8): 901-905, 922. (in Chinese)

[29]

ZHANG X W, DAI J, LIU F Q. Research on working mode of remote sensing satellite with agile attitude control[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2011, 20(4): 32-38. (in Chinese)

Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology)
Pages 1555-1564
Cite this article:
MU S, LIU H, SONG J, et al. Autonomous target asteroid search strategy using optical camera. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2024, 64(9): 1555-1564. https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.26.042

39

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 04 November 2023
Published: 15 September 2024
© Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology). All rights reserved.
Return