Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
The effect of negative public opinion events on social networks is underestimated. To address the issue of sentiment-based methods not being able to directly achieve early warning of negative online public opinion, this study proposes a sentiment classification and topic extraction-based approach to public opinion topic modeling. Using negative emotional topics as an entry point, this study shifts from investigating negative public opinion events to examining negative public opinion topics, thus facilitating statistical and quantifiable analysis of such events. Additionally, to address the persistent shortcomings of methods for negative public opinion early warning, we construct a novel early warning evaluation metric, which is known as the public opinion topic arithmetic index (POI). This index comprehensively assesses the developmental trends of public opinion topics across three dimensions: explosion index (EI), sentiment index (SI), and dissemination index (DI).
This study employs the ERNIE 3.0 large-scale language model for sentiment classification. The annotated sentiment dataset is further trained and fine-tuned to obtain the required sentiment classifier. It performs sentiment classification on a COVID-19 Weibo emotional dataset, computing various post sentiments. The topic extraction module uses the TF-IDF algorithm to extract topics. Each noun tag is considered a potential topic, whereas each Weibo post is treated as a document. The TF-IDF method captures frequently occurring words by calculating their frequencies and avoiding less important terms that appear in each document. The TF-IDF topic extraction algorithm extracts topics from negative emotional Weibo posts and identifies relevant topics associated with negative public opinion events. Finally, POI is employed for further analysis based on the extracted public opinion topics. Consequently, early warning is achieved by analyzing negative public opinion topics instead of events. Furthermore, POI comprehensively calculates the effect of negative public opinion topics by combining EI, SI, and DI. EI reflects the growth rate of the current number of textual instances related to negative emotional topics compared to the average number in a previous period; SI mainly reflects the public's emotions and sentiments triggered by public opinion topics; and DI mainly represents the scope and speed of dissemination of public opinion topics. Finally, a comprehensive negative emotional topic public opinion index is derived by calculating the EI, SI, and DI of emotional topics and postdata information, and the topics that exceeded the warning threshold are warned.
The experimental results reveal that the proposed early warning model effectively predicts social media public opinion events. Among the top ten negatively perceived topics ranked based on weight, the earliest warning time exceeds the average outbreak day by 161.01 hours, with an average of 2.1 early warnings. Additionally, the earliest warning time exceeds the average peak day by 261.81 hours, with an average of 5.8 early warnings.
We establish a threshold for triggering the arithmetic index of public opinion topics by modeling and calculating the arithmetic index of negative public opinion topics in this study. This enables us to exclude negative topics and corresponding public opinion events that surpass the threshold, thereby achieving early warning for topic-related negative public opinion events. The proposed negative public opinion warning model accomplishes its intended objective by employing sentiment analysis methods for the early detection of online public opinions.
LIAN Y, DONG X F, LIU Y J. Topological evolution of the internet public opinion [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, 486: 567-578.
KUMAR P, HAMA S, OMIDVARBORNA H, et al. Temporary reduction in fine particulate matter due to 'anthropogenic emissions switch-off' during COVID-19 lockdown in Indian cities [J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 62: 102382.
YAN L, ZHANG H T, GONCALVES J, et al. An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients [J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2020, 2(5): 283-288.
GALLOTTI R, VALLE F, CASTALDO N, et al. Assessing the risks of 'infodemics' in response to COVID-19 epidemics [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2020, 4(12): 1285-1293.
SHEN L, XU M H. Student public opinion management in campus commentary based on deep learning [J]. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 2022: 2130391.
CUI S, HAN Y, DUAN Y, et al. A two-stage voting-boosting technique for ensemble learning in social network sentiment classification[J]. Entropy, 2023, 25(4): 555.
SHAH A M, YAN X B, QAYYUM A, et al. Mining topic and sentiment dynamics in physician rating websites during the early wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Machine learning approach [J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2021, 149: 104434.
ZHANG Y, LI B, LIU C Y. Topic-oriented monitoring of public sentiment towards popular Weibo events: A case study on "Regular 'Odd-even' vehicle restriction in Beijing" [J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2015, 29(5): 143-151, 159. (in Chinese)
HU H J, WEI Y H, ZHOU Y. Product-harm crisis intelligent warning system design based on fine-grained sentiment analysis of automobile complaints [J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2023, 9(3): 2313-2320.
ZHU R B, DING Q A, YU M, et al. Early warning scheme of COVID-19 related internet public opinion based on RVM-L model [J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 74: 103141.
WANG X W, ZHANG L, WEN Q, et al. Research on sentiment evaluation of online public opinion based on the Bayesian model in a mobile environment: The case of "China women's volleyball won the championship in the Rio Olympics" in SinaWeibo [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(12): 1241-1248. (in Chinese)
LI W J, QI F, YU Z T. Sentiment classification method based on multi-channel features and self-attention [J]. Journal of Software, 2021, 32(9): 2783-2800. (in Chinese)
CHOUDRIE J, PATIL S, KOTECHA K, et al. Applying and understanding an advanced, novel deep learning approach: A COVID 19, text based, emotions analysis study [J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2021, 23(6): 1431-1465.
SHI L, DU J P, LIANG M Y. Social network bursty topic discovery based on RNN and topic model [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(4): 189-198. (in Chinese)
IFTENE A, GINSCA A L. Using opinion mining techniques for early crisis detection [J]. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 2014, 7(5): 857-864.
HAN X H, WANG J L, ZHANG M, et al. Using social media to mine and analyze public opinion related to COVID-19 in China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(8): 2788.
XU W, LIU L Y, SHANG W. Leveraging cross-media analytics to detect events and mine opinions for emergency management [J]. Online Information Review, 2017, 41(4): 487-506.
SARIRETE A. Sentiment analysis tracking of COVID-19 vaccine through Tweets [J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2022: 1-9.
DEL VICARIO M, QUATTROCIOCCHI W, SCALA A, et al. Polarization and fake news: Early warning of potential misinformation targets [J]. ACM Transactions on the Web, 2019, 13(2): 10.
JIA Y M, AN L, LI G. On the online information dissemination pattern of city emergencies [J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(4): 91-96, 90. (in Chinese)