AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (856.6 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Regular Paper | Open Access

An Efficient Method for Identifying the Inactive Transmission Constraints in a Network-constrained Unit Commitment

Ziming Ma1Haiwang Zhong1( )Qing Xia1Chongqing Kang1Qiang Wang2Xin Cao2
State Key Laboratory of Power Systems and the Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
State Grid Hebei Electric Power Company, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Network-constrained unit commitment (NCUC) is one of the most widely used applications in power system and electricity market operations. According to empirical evidence, some of the transmission constraints in a NCUC are inactive. Identifying and eliminating these inactive constraints can improve the efficiency. In this paper, an efficient method is first proposed for identifying the inactive transmission constraints. The physical and economic insights of NCUC are carefully considered and utilized. Both the generating costs and power transfer distribution factor (PTDF) are considered. Not only redundant constraints but also non-binding constraints can be identified via the proposed method. An acceleration method that combines relaxation-based neighborhood search and improved relaxation inducement is proposed for further reducing the computation time. The case study shows that the proposed method can significantly reduce the number of transmission constraints and substantially improve the efficiency of NCUC without impacting the optimality.

References

[1]

Y. Fu and M. Shahidehpour, “Fast SCUC for large-scale power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2144–2151, Nov. 2007.

[2]

S. Paulraj and P. Sumathi, “A comparative study of redundant constraints identification methods in linear programming problems,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2010, pp. 723402, Sep. 2010.

[3]

G. L. Thompson, F. M. Tonge, and S. Zionts, “Techniques for removing nonbinding constraints and extraneous variables from linear programming problems,” Management Science, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 588–608, Mar. 1966.

[4]

Y. H. Chen, A. Casto, F. Y. Wang, Q. F. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Wan, “Improving large scale day-ahead security constrained unit commitment performance,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 4732–4743, Nov. 2016.

[5]
J. Telgen, “Redundant and non-binding constraints in linear programming problems,” Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Holland, Discussion Paper, 1977.
[6]

A. J. Ardakani, and F. Bouffard, “Identification of umbrella constraints in DC-based security-constrained optimal power flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 3924–3934, Nov. 2013.

[7]

A. J. Ardakani and F. Bouffard, “Acceleration of umbrella constraint discovery in generation scheduling problems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2100–2109, Jul. 2015.

[8]

A. Upadhyay, B. Q. Hu, J. Li, and L. Wu, “A chance-constrained wind range quantification approach to robust SCUC by determining dynamic uncertainty intervals,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–64, Mar. 2016.

[9]

D. A. Tejada-Arango, P. Sánchez-Martın, and A. Ramos, “Security constrained unit commitment using line outage distribution factors,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 329–337, Jan. 2018.

[10]

Á. S. Xavier, F. Qiu, F. Y. Wang, and P. R. Thimmapuram, “Transmission constraint filtering in large-scale security-constrained unit commitment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2457–2460, May 2019.

[11]

S. Ghannadi, M. Mehrtash, M. Mohammadi, and M. Raoofat, “Determining inactive constraints in stochastic security-constrained unit commitment using cumulants,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2123–2135, Feb. 2017.

[12]

Q. Z. Zhai, X. H. Guan, J. H. Cheng, and H. Y. Wu, “Fast identification of inactive security constraints in SCUC problems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1946–1954, Nov. 2010.

[13]

R. Madani, J. Lavaei, and R. Baldick, “Constraint screening for security analysis of power networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1828–1838, May 2017.

[14]

M. Javadi, M. G. Hong, R. N. Angarita, S. H. Hosseini, and J. N. Jiang, “Identification of simultaneously congested transmission lines in power systems operation and market analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1772–1781, May 2017.

[15]

T. Ding, Z. Y. Wu, J. J. Lv, Z. H. Bie, and X. J. Zhang, “Robust co-optimization to energy and ancillary service joint dispatch considering wind power uncertainties in real-time electricity markets,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1547–1557, Oct. 2016.

[16]

M. L. Zhang, X. M. Ai, J. K. Fang, W. Yao, W. P. Zuo, Z. Chen, and J. Y. Wen, “A systematic approach for the joint dispatch of energy and reserve incorporating demand response,” Applied Energy, vol. 230, pp. 1279–1291, Nov. 2018.

[17]
S. Cvijic and J. J. Xiong, “Security constrained unit commitment and economic dispatch through benders decomposition: a comparative study,” in Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2011.
[18]

Y. Chen, F. Liu, W. Wei, S. W. Mei, and N. C. Chang, “Robust unit commitment for large-scale wind generation and run-off-river hydropower,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 66–75, Dec. 2016.

[19]

Z. M. Ma, H. W. Zhong, Q. Xia, C. Q. Kang, Q. Wang, and X. Cao, “A unit commitment algorithm with relaxation-based neighborhood search and improved relaxation inducement,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 3800–3809, Sep. 2020.

CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems
Pages 2366-2373
Cite this article:
Ma Z, Zhong H, Xia Q, et al. An Efficient Method for Identifying the Inactive Transmission Constraints in a Network-constrained Unit Commitment. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2023, 9(6): 2366-2373. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.00360

121

Views

1

Downloads

1

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 13 February 2020
Revised: 30 April 2020
Accepted: 23 May 2020
Published: 06 July 2020
© 2020 CSEE.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return