AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Adaptive state estimation of groundwater contaminant boundary input flux in a 2-dimensional aquifer

Muhammad Malik Nauman1( )Murtuza Mehdi2Asif Iqbal1Muhammad Saifullah Abu Bakar1Brahim Aissa3Dk Nur Afiqah Jalwati Puteri1Amer Farhan Rafique4
Faculty of Integrated Technologies, University Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong, BE1410, Bandar Seri Bega‐ wan, Brunei Darussalam
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan
College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Show Author Information

Abstract

In many circumstances involving heat and mass transfer issues, it is considered impractical to measure the input flux and the resulting state distribution in the domain. Therefore, the need to develop techniques to provide solutions for such problems and estimate the inverse mass flux becomes imperative. Adaptive state estimator (ASE) is increasingly becoming a popular inverse estimation technique which resolves inverse problems by incorporating the semi-Markovian concept into a Bayesian estimation technique, thereby developing an inverse input and state estimator consisting of a bank of parallel adaptively weighted Kalman filters. The ASE is particularly designed for a system that encompasses independent unknowns and /or random switching of input and measurement biases. The present study describes the scheme to estimate the groundwater input contaminant flux and its transient distribution in a conjectural two-dimensional aquifer by means of ASE, which in particular is because of its unique ability to efficiently handle the process noise giving an estimation of keeping the relative error range within 10% in 2-dimensional problems. Numerical simulation results show that the proposed estimator presents decent estimation performance for both smoothly and abruptly varying input flux scenarios. Results also show that ASE enjoys a better estimation performance than its competitor, Recursive Least Square Estimator (RLSE) due to its larger error tolerance in greater process noise regimes. ASE's inherent deficiency of being slower than the RLSE, resulting from the complexity of algorithm, was also noticed. The chosen input scenarios are tested to calculate the effect of input area and both estimators show improved results with an increase in input flux area especially as sensors are moved closer to the assumed input location.

References

 

Aral M M, Guan J. 1996. Genetic algorithms in search of groundwater pollution sources. Advances in Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, 9: 347-369.

 

Assumaning G A, Chang S Y. 2014. State and parameter estimation in three-dimensional subsurface contaminant transport modeling using Kalman Filter coupled with Monte Carlo Sampling. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 24(2): 80-89.

 

Howard R A. 1964. System analysis of semiMarkov processes. IEEE Transactions on Military Electronics, 8(2): 114-124.

 

Huang C H, Li J X, Kim S. 2008. An inverse problem in estimating the strength of contamination source for groundwater systems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32: 417-431.

 

Ijaz U Z, Khambampati A K, Kim M C, et al. 2007. Estimation of time-dependent heat flux and measurement bias in two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problems. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 50(21-22): 4117-4130.

 

Jazwinski A H. 1970. Stochastic processes and filtering theory. New York: Academic Press.

 

Jha M, Datta B. 2013. Three-dimensional groundwater contamination source identification using adaptive simulated annealing. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18(3): 307-317.

 

Ji C C, Tuan P C, Jang H Y. 1997. A recursive least-squares algorithm for on-line 1-D inverse heat conduction estimation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 40 (9): 2081-2096.

 

Konikow L F, Goode L F, Hornberger G Z. 1996. A three-dimensional method of characterristics solute-transport model (MOC3D), U S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report, 96: 4267.

 

Liu C, Ball W P. 1999. Application of inverse methods to contaminant source identification from aquitard diffusion profiles at Dover AFB. Delaware. Water Resources Research, 35(7): 1975-1985.

 

Moose R L, Sistanizadeh M K, Skagfjord G. 1987. Adaptive state estimation for a system with unknown input and measurement bias. IEEE Journal Oceanic Engineering, 12(1): 222-227.

 

Muhammad N M. 2017. Adaptive boundary input heat flux and temperature estimation in a three-dimensional domain. Heat Transfer Research, 48(3): 239-261.

 

Muhammad N M, Kim K Y, Huang C H, et al. 2010. Groundwater contaminant boundary input flux estimation in a two-dimensional aquifer. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 16(1): 106-114.

 

Neupauer R M, Borchers B, Wilson J L. 2000. Comparison of inverse methods for reconstructing the release history of a groundwater contamination source. Water Resources Research, 36: 2469-2475.

 

Newman M, Hatfield K, Hayworth J, et al. 2005. A hybrid method for inverse characterization of subsurface contaminant flux. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 81(1-4): 34-62.

 
Ruperti N J. 2002. Estimation of the release history of a contaminant source in 2-D groundwater systems. 4th International Conference on Inverse Problems in Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
 

Sciortino A, Harmon T C, Yeh W W G. 2000. Inverse modeling for locating dense nonaqueous pools in groundwater under steady flow conditions. Water Resources Research, 36(7): 1723-1735.

 

Skaggs H T, Kabala Z J. 1994. Minimum relative entropy inversion: Theory and application to recovering the release history of a groundwater contaminant. Water Resources Research, 32(9): 71-79.

 

Tuan P C, Ju M C. 2001. Adaptive weighting input estimation algorithm for one dimensional cylindrical inverse heat conduction problems. Proceeding of National Science Council ROCA, 25: 163-171.

 

Woodbury A, Sudicky E, Ulrych T J, et al. 1998. Three-dimensional plume source reconstruction using minimum relative entropy inversion. Journal of Contamination Hydrology, 32: 131-158.

 

Wagner B J. 1992. Simultaneous parameter estimation and contaminant source characterization for coupled groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 135(1-4): 275-303.

 

WEN Shuang, QI Hong, YU Xiao-Ying, et al. 2018. Realtime estimation of time-dependent imposed heat flux in graded index media by KF-RLSE algorithm. Applied Thermal Engineering, 150: 1-10.

Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 373-382
Cite this article:
Nauman MM, Mehdi M, Iqbal A, et al. Adaptive state estimation of groundwater contaminant boundary input flux in a 2-dimensional aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 373-382. https://doi.org/10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2019.04.008

296

Views

7

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 30 April 2019
Accepted: 22 June 2019
Published: 28 December 2019
© 2019 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office
Return