AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Aquifer hydraulic conductivity prediction via coupling model of MCMC-ANN

Chun-lei GUIZhen-xing WANG( )Rong MAXue-feng ZUO
The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Sciences and Engineering, MNR, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Grain-size distribution data, as a substitute for measuring hydraulic conductivity (K), has often been used to get K value indirectly. With grain-size distribution data of 150 sets of samples being input data, this study combined the Artificial Neural Network technology (ANN) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo method (MCMC), which replaced the Monte Carlo method (MC) of Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), to establish the GLUE-ANN model for hydraulic conductivity prediction and uncertainty analysis. By means of applying the GLUE-ANN model to a typical piedmont region and central region of North China Plain, and being compared with actually measured values of hydraulic conductivity, the relative error ranges are between 1.55% and 23.53% and between 14.08% and 27.22% respectively, the accuracy of which can meet the requirements of groundwater resources assessment. The global best parameter gained through posterior distribution test indicates that the GLUE-ANN model, which has satisfying sampling efficiency and optimization capability, is able to reasonably reflect the uncertainty of hydrogeological parameters. Furthermore, the influence of stochastic observation error (SOE) in grain-size analysis upon prediction of hydraulic conductivity was discussed, and it is believed that the influence can not be neglected.

References

 

Alfaro Soto MA, Chang HK, Th M, et al. 2017. Fractal-based models for the unsaturated soil hydraulic functions. Geoderma, 306: 144-151.

 

Awad HS, Bassam AM. 2001. A computer program to calculate hydraulic conductivity from grain size data in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 17(2): 237-246.

 

Das SK, Samui P, Sabat AK. 2012. Prediction of field hydraulic conductivity of clay liners using an artificial neural network and support vector machine. International Journal of Geomechanics, 12(5): 606-611.

 

David CW, Asce F. 2003. Goodbye, Hazen; Hello, Kozeny-Carman. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(11): 1054-1056.

 

DONG Pei. 2010. Laboratory studies of sand column on the dynamic evaporation on a shallow water table. M.S. thesis, Beijing: China University of Geosciences: 10-22. (in Chinese)

 

Erzin Y, Gumaste SD, Gupta AK, et al. 2009. Artificial neural network (ANN) models for determining hydraulic conductivity of compacted fine-grained soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46: 955-968

 

FAN Gui-sheng, XING Ri-xian, ZHANG Ming-bin. 2012. Experimental study on permeability of the sandy gravel media with different gradation. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 43(3): 373-378. (in Chinese)

 

GONG Guang-lu, QIAN Min-ping. 2003. Applied stochastic coursebook and its application to algorithm and intelligent computing. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press: 35-58. (in Chinese)

 

Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J. 2005. Compon-entwise adaptation for high dimensional MCMC. Computational Statistics, 20(2): 265-273.

 

Hasan M, Ozer C, Ramazan M, et al. 2006. Comparison of artificial neural and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil and Tillage Research, 90(2): 108-116.

 

Haykin S. 2004. Neural Networks: A compre-hensive foundation, second edition. Beijing: China Machine Press: 46-55. (in Chinese)

 

Isik Y, Marian M, Martin B. 2012. Neural com-puting models for prediction of permeability coefficient of coarse-grained soils. Neural Computing and Applications, 21(5): 957-968.

 

JI Rui-li, ZHANG Ming, SU Rui, 2016. Research of in-situ hydraulic test method by using double packer equipment. Journal of Ground-water Science and Engineering, 4(1): 41-51.

 

Justine O. 2007. Evaluation of empirical formulae for determination of hydraulic conductivity based on Grain-size analysis. Journal of American Science, 3(3): 54-60.

 

Keith B. 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320(1-2): 18-36.

 

Koekkoek JW, Booltink H. 1999. Neural network models to predict soil water retention. European Journal of Soil Science, 50(3): 489-495.

 

LI Shou-ju, LIU Ying-xi, WANG Deng-gang, et al. 2002. Inversion algorithm of permeability coefficients of rockmass and its application based on artificial neural network. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 21(4): 479-483. (in Chinese)

 

LU Le, WU Ji-chun. 2010. Bayesian analysis of uncertainties in groundwater numerical simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 41(3): 264-271.

 

LU Le, WU Ji-chun, CHEN Jing-Ya. 2008. Identification of hydrogeological parameters based on the bayesian method. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 58(5): 58-63. (in Chinese)

 

Mahmoud S, Alyaman I, Zekai S. 1993. Deter-mination of hydraulic conductivity from complete Grain-Size Distribution Curves. Ground Water, 31(4): 551-555.

 

MAO Shi-song. 1999. Bayesian statistics. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

 

Nakhaei M. 2005. Estimating the saturated hy-draulic conductivity of granular material using artificial neural network based on grain size distribution curve. Islam Repub Iran, 16(1): 55-62.

 

Namunu JM, Ian PK, Arulanandan K. 1989. An expression for the permeability of anisotropic granular media. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geo-mechanics, 13(6): 575-598.

 

Park HI. 2011. Development of neural network model to estimate the permeability coe-fficient of soils. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 29(4): 267-278.

 

Russel GS. 1989. Correlations of permeability and grain size. Ground Water, 27(5): 633-636.

 

Salarashayeri AF, Siosemarde M. 2012. Prediction of soil hydraulic conductivity from particle-size distribution. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 61: 454-457.

 

Smiles DE, Youngs EG. 1963. A Multiple-well method for determining the hydraulic con-ductivity of a saturated soil in Situ. Journal of Hydrology, 1(4): 279-287.

 

Smith AFM, Roberts GO. 1993. Bayesian com-putation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo Methods. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 55: 3-24.

 

TANG Xiao-song, ZHENG Ying-ren, DONG Cheng. 2007. The prediction of seepage co-efficient of coarse-grained soil by neurotic network. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 28: 133-136, 143. (in Chinese)

 

WANG Dong, Vijay PS, ZHU Yuan-shen, et al. 2009. Stochastic observation error and uncertainty in water quality evaluation. Ad-vances in Water Resources, 32: 1526-1534.

 

XU Peng, QIU Shu-xia, JIANG Zhou-ting, et al. 2011. Fractal analysis of Kozeny-Carman constant in the homogenous porous media. Journal of Chongqing University, 34(4): 78-82. (in Chinese)

Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 1-11
Cite this article:
GUI C-l, WANG Z-x, MA R, et al. Aquifer hydraulic conductivity prediction via coupling model of MCMC-ANN. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.001

454

Views

52

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 15 July 2020
Accepted: 12 September 2020
Published: 28 March 2021
© 2021 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office
Return