AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (428.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Prediction criteria for groundwater potential zones in Kemuning District, Indonesia using the integration of geoelectrical and physical parameters

Muhammad Juandi1( )Islami Nur2
Department of Physics, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru Indonesia
Department of Physical Education, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru Indonesia
Show Author Information

Abstract

The presence of groundwater is strongly related to its geological and geohydrological conditions. It is, however, important to study the groundwater potential in an area before it is utilized to provide clean water. Werner-Schlumberger's method was used to analyze the groundwater potential while hydraulic properties such as soil porosity and hydraulic conductivity were used to determine the quality and ability of the soil to allow water's movement in the aquifer. The results show that the aquifer in the Sekara and Kemuning Muda is at a depth of more than 6 meters below the ground level with moderate groundwater potential. It is also found that the aquifer at depths of over 60 m have high groundwater potential. Moreover, soil porosity in Kemuning is found to be average while the ability to conduct water was moderate. This makes it possible for some surface water to seep into the soil while the remaining flows to the rivers and ditches.

References

 

Alley WM, Healy RW, LaBaugh JW, et al. 2002. Flow and storage in groundwater systems. Science, 296: 1985-1990.

 

Bechte TD, Nico G. 2017. Geoelectrical finger-printing of two contrasting ecohydrological peatland types in the Alps. Wetlands, 37: 875-884.

 

Heriyanto H, Karya D, Choanji T, et al. 2019. Regression model in transitional geological environment for calculation farming and production of oil palm dominant factor in Indragiri Hilir Riau Province. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment and Technology, 4(1): 56-65.

 

Islami N, Taib S, Yusoff I, et al. 2011. Time lapse chemical fertilizer monitoring in agri-culture sandy soil. International Journal of Environmental Scince Technology, 8: 765-780.

 

Juandi M, Syahril S. 2017. Empirical relationship between soil permeability and resistivity, and its application for determining the ground-water gross recharge in Marpoyan Damai, Pekanbaru, Indonesia. Water Practice and Technology, 12(3): 660-666.

 

Juandi M, Surbakti A, Syech R, et al. 2017. Poten-tial of aquifers for groundwater exploitation using Cooper-Jacob Equation. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10: 215-219.

 

Juandi M. 2019. Study of groundwater in the rock area using geoelectric survey. Journal of Ph-ysics Conference Series, 1351: 012010.

 

Juandi M. 2020. Water sustainability model for estimation of groundwater availability in Kemuning district, Riau-Indonesia. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8(1): 20-29.

 
Krüger JP, Dotterweich M, Kopf C, et al. 2017. Carbon balance of rewetted peatland forests in low mountain range areas, Germany. Pro-ceedings of EGU General Assembly Vienna, Austria, 3212, April 23-28.
 

Lenkey L, Hámori Z, Mihálffy P. 2005. Investiga-ting the hydrogeology of a water-supply area using direct-current vertical electrical sound-ings. Geophysics, 70(4): 11-19.

 

Loke MH, Chambers JE, Rucker DF, et al. 2013. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 95: 135-156.

 

LU Chuan, LI Long, LIU Yan-guang, et al. 2014. Capillary pressure and relative permeability model uncertainties in simulations of geological CO2 sequestration. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2(2): 1-17.

 

Muhammad J. 2020. Peat water purification by hybrid of slow sand filtration and coagulant treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(1): 22-28.

 

Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding KW. 2011. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: A critical reexamination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science, 62(1): 42-55.

 

Revil A, Karaoulis M, Johnson T, et al. 2012. Review: Some low-frequency electrical me-thods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal, 20: 617-658.

 
Sheriff RE. 2002. Encyclopedic dictionary of applied geophysics, 4th edition. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: 30-34.
 

Silliman SE, Borum BI, Boukari M, et al. 2010. Issues of sustainability of coastal groundwater resources: Benin, West Africa. Sustainability, 2(8): 2652-2675.

 
Sultan SA, Santos FAM. 2008. Evaluating sub-surface structures and stratigraphic units using 2D electrical and magnetic data at the area North Greater Cairo, Egypt, International Journal Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 10: 56-67.
 

Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE. 1991. Aplied Geophysic, 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press: 283-290.

 

Udmale P, Shrestha S, Ichikawa Y, et al. 2014. Assessing groundwater resource and its sus-tainability in drought prone area of India. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering), 58: 235-240.

 

Wada Y, Wisser D, Bierkens MFP. 2014. Global modeling of withdrawal, allocation and con-sumptive use of surface water and ground-water resources. Earth System Dynamics, 5: 15-40.

 

Wagner B, Tarnawski VR, Hennings V, et al. 2001. Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma, 102(3-4): 275-297.

Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 12-19
Cite this article:
Juandi M, Nur I. Prediction criteria for groundwater potential zones in Kemuning District, Indonesia using the integration of geoelectrical and physical parameters. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(1): 12-19. https://doi.org/10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.01.002

533

Views

37

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

7

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 22 June 2020
Accepted: 18 August 2020
Published: 28 March 2021
© 2021 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office
Return