AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Study on supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle cooling source disturbance control

Yuwei SUN1,2Fulin LIU1,2Wei WEI3Chengqing YUAN2,3( )Zhenguo SONG4
School of Naval Architecture , Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
China Ship Development and Design Center, Wuhan 430064, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objectives

This paper aims to cope with the possible impact of external condition disturbances on the operating parameters of a supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) Brayton cycle power generation system and ensure its efficient, safe and stable operation.

Methods

A dynamic numerical simulation model of a simple S-CO2 Brayton cycle power generation system is built using the Matlab/Simulink platform, and the transient operation characteristics of the system are analyzed. The change laws of the operating parameters of the thermodynamic cycle system under changing cooler parameters are then simulated, and the influence of the temperature fluctuation of the cooling source on the inlet and outlet parameters of the system components, system cycle efficiency and adjustment methods are analyzed.

Results

The results show that the maximum error between the established system transient simulation model results and the experimental results is 3.658%; a 2 K increase in the cooling water temperature will lead to a 1.4 K increase in the compressor inlet temperature, and the system will need 300 s to restore stability; after adding a PID control system, the compressor inlet temperature change amplitude is reduced by 50% and the system stabilization time is reduced by 62%.

Conclusions

The established model can accurately reflect the operation of the system. Based on the opposition of the influence of cooling water temperature increase and flow increase on the system, the proposed PID control system can ensure that the carbon dioxide working fluid in the system is always above the critical point, thereby ensuring the safe and stable operation of the system.

CLC number: U664.1 Document code: A

References

[1]

ANGELINO G. Carbon dioxide condensation cycles for power production[J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1968, 90(3): 287–295.

[2]
WRIGHT S A, RADEL R F, VERNON M E, et al. Operation and analysis of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle[R]. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, 2010.
[3]

SARKAR J. Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 48: 434–451.

[4]

SUN Y W, LU M J, WEI W, et al. Review of S-CO2 Brayton cycle power generation technology for waste heat utilization onboard[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2021, 62(1): 254–265 (in Chinese).

[5]
YANG Y L. Transient modeling and analysis of supercritical Carbone dioxide Brayton cycle[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2018 (in Chinese).
[6]
SUN J. Characteristic simulation and control of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle power generation system[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018 (in Chinese).
[7]

JIN W C, GE S. The international development of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle power generation technology and its application[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(11): 6–9 (in Chinese).

[8]

CHEN H J, GOSWAMI D Y, STEFANAKOS E K. A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(9): 3059–3067.

[9]

LIAO G L, LIU L J, E J Q, et al. Effects of technical progress on performance and application of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: a review[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 199: 111986.

[10]
DOSTAL V. A supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for next generation nuclear reactors[D]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
[11]

LIANG D H, ZHANG Y L, GUO Q X, et al. Modeling and analysis of nuclear reactor system using supercritical-CO2 Brayton cycle[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 2015, 54(5): 608–613 (in Chinese).

[12]

SERRANO I P, CANTIZANO A, LINARES J I, et al. Modeling and sizing of the heat exchangers of a new supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle for energy conversion for fusion reactors[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2014, 89(9/10): 1905–1908.

[13]

CHENG L X, RIBATSKI G, THOME J R. Analysis of supercritical CO2 cooling in macro-and micro-channels[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2008, 31(8): 1301–1316.

[14]
DYREBY J J. Modeling the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with recompression[D]. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2014.
[15]

OLUMAYEGUN O, WANG M H. Dynamic modelling and control of supercritical CO2 power cycle using waste heat from industrial processes[J]. Fuel, 2019, 249: 89–102.

[16]

FENG J C. Thermodynamic analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle power system[J]. Energy Conservation, 2019, 38(8): 34–38 (in Chinese).

[17]
CARSTENS N. Control strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide power conversion systems[D]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.
[18]
WU R. Study on the steady-state characteristics of marine two stage regenerative recompression S-CO2 Brayton cycle[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2020 (in Chinese).
Chinese Journal of Ship Research
Pages 234-243
Cite this article:
SUN Y, LIU F, WEI W, et al. Study on supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle cooling source disturbance control. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(5): 234-243. https://doi.org/10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02980

48

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 29 June 2022
Revised: 15 August 2022
Published: 10 April 2023
© 2023 Chinese Journal of Ship Research.
Return