AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (797.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Reduced anoctamin 7 (ANO7) expression is a strong and independent predictor of poor prognosis in prostate cancer

Andreas Marx1,*Lena Koopmann2,*Doris Höflmayer2Franziska Büscheck2Claudia Hube-Magg2Stefan Steurer2Till Eichenauer3Till S. Clauditz2Waldemar Wilczak2Ronald Simon2 ( )Guido Sauter2Jakob R. Izbicki4Hartwig Huland5Hans Heinzer5Markus Graefen5Alexander Haese5Thorsten Schlomm6Christian Bernreuther2Patrick Lebok2Sarah Bonk3
Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth 90766, Germany
Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
Department of Urology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

Anoctamin 7 (ANO7) is a calcium2+-dependent chloride ion channel protein. Its expression is restricted to prostate epithelial cells. The exact function is unknown. This study aimed to analyze ANO7 expression and its clinical significance in prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

ANO7 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 17,747 clinical PCa specimens.

Results

ANO7 was strongly expressed in normal prostate glandular cells but often less abundant in cancer cells. ANO7 staining was interpretable in 13,594 cancer tissues and considered strong in 34.4%, moderate in 48.7%, weak in 9.3%, and negative in 7.6%. Reduced staining was tightly linked to adverse tumor features [high classical and quantitative Gleason grade, lymph node metastasis, advanced tumor stage, high Ki67 labeling index, positive surgical margin, and early biochemical recurrence (P < 0.0001 each)]. The univariate Cox hazard ratio for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after prostatectomy in patients with negative vs. strong ANO7 expression was 2.98 (95% confidence interval 2.61–3.38). The prognostic impact was independent of established pre- or postoperatively available parameters (P < 0.0001). Analysis of annotated molecular data showed that low ANO7 expression was linked to TMPRSS2:ERG fusions (P < 0.0001), elevated androgen receptor expression (P < 0.0001), as well as presence of 9 of 11 chromosomal deletions (P < 0.05 each). A particularly strong association of low ANO7 expression with phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) deletion may indicate a functional relationship with the PTEN/AKT pathway.

Conclusions

These data identify reduced ANO7 protein expression as a strong and independent predictor of poor prognosis in PCa. ANO7 measurement, either alone or in combination, might provide clinically useful prognostic information in PCa.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cbm-18-1-245_ESM.pdf (397.6 KB)

References

1

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424.

2

Wanitchakool P, Wolf L, Koehl GE, Sirianant L, Schreiber R, Kulkarni S, et al. Role of anoctamins in cancer and apoptosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369: 20130096.

3

Bera TK, Das S, Maeda H, Beers R, Wolfgang CD, Kumar V, et al. NGEP, a gene encoding a membrane protein detected only in prostate cancer and normal prostate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 3059-64.

4

Das S, Hahn Y, Nagata S, Willingham MC, Bera TK, Lee B, et al. NGEP, a prostate-specific plasma membrane protein that promotes the association of lncap cells. Cancer Res. 2007; 67: 1594-601.

5

Cropp CD, Simpson CL, Wahlfors T, Ha N, George A, Jones MS, et al. Genome-wide linkage scan for prostate cancer susceptibility in finland: evidence for a novel locus on 2q37.3 and confirmation of signal on 17q21-q22. Int J Cancer. 2011; 129: 2400-7.

6

Das S, Hahn Y, Walker DA, Nagata S, Willingham MC, Peehl DM, et al. Topology of NGEP, a prostate-specific cell: cell junction protein widely expressed in many cancers of different grade level. Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 6306-12.

7

Mohsenzadegan M, Madjd Z, Asgari M, Abolhasani M, Shekarabi M, Taeb J, et al. Reduced expression of NGEP is associated with high-grade prostate cancers: a tissue microarray analysis. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013; 62: 1609-18.

8

Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cbio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012; 2: 401-4.

9

Kaikkonen E, Rantapero T, Zhang Q, Taimen P, Laitinen V, Kallajoki M, et al. ANO7 is associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018; 143: 2479-87.

10

Sauter G, Steurer S, Clauditz TS, Krech T, Wittmer C, Lutz F, et al. Clinical utility of quantitative gleason grading in prostate biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 592-8.

11

Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, et al. Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med. 1998; 4: 844-7.

12

Tennstedt P, Koster P, Bruchmann A, Mirlacher M, Haese A, Steuber T, et al. The impact of the number of cores on tissue microarray studies investigating prostate cancer biomarkers. Int J Oncol. 2012; 40: 261-8.

13

Minner S, Enodien M, Sirma H, Luebke AM, Krohn A, Mayer PS, et al. ERG status is unrelated to PSA recurrence in radically operated prostate cancer in the absence of antihormonal therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17: 5878-88.

14

Minner S, Wittmer C, Graefen M, Salomon G, Steuber T, Haese A, et al. High level PSMA expression is associated with early PSA recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011; 71: 281-8.

15

Krohn A, Seidel A, Burkhardt L, Bachmann F, Mader M, Grupp K, et al. Recurrent deletion of 3p13 targets multiple tumour suppressor genes and defines a distinct subgroup of aggressive erg fusion-positive prostate cancers. J Pathol. 2013; 231: 130-41.

16

Burkhardt L, Fuchs S, Krohn A, Masser S, Mader M, Kluth M, et al. CHD1 is a 5q21 tumor suppressor required for erg rearrangement in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 2795-805.

17

Kluth M, Hesse J, Heinl A, Krohn A, Steurer S, Sirma H, et al. Genomic deletion of MAP3K7 at 6q12-22 is associated with early PSA recurrence in prostate cancer and absence of TMPRSS2:ERG fusions. Mod Pathol. 2013; 26: 975-83.

18

Kluth M, Amschler NN, Galal R, Moller-Koop C, Barrow P, Tsourlakis MC, et al. Deletion of 8p is an independent prognostic parameter in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 379-92.

19

Krohn A, Diedler T, Burkhardt L, Mayer PS, De Silva C, Meyer-Kornblum M, et al. Genomic deletion of PTEN is associated with tumor progression and early PSA recurrence in ERG fusion-positive and fusion-negative prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 2012; 181: 401-12.

20

Kluth M, Ahrary R, Hube-Magg C, Ahmed M, Volta H, Schwemin C, et al. Genomic deletion of chromosome 12p is an independent prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 27966-79.

21

Weischenfeldt J, Simon R, Feuerbach L, Schlangen K, Weichenhan D, Minner S, et al. Integrative genomic analyses reveal an androgen-driven somatic alteration landscape in early-onset prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2013; 23: 159-70.

22

Kluth M, Scherzai S, Buschek F, Fraune C, Moller K, Hoflmayer D, et al. 13q deletion is linked to an adverse phenotype and poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Gene Chromosome Canc. 2018; 57: 504-12.

23

Kluth M, Jung S, Habib O, Eshagzaiy M, Heinl A, Amschler N, et al. Deletion lengthening at chromosomes 6q and 16q targets multiple tumor suppressor genes and is associated with an increasingly poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 108923-35.

24

Kluth M, Harasimowicz S, Burkhardt L, Grupp K, Krohn A, Prien K, et al. Clinical significance of different types of p53 gene alteration in surgically treated prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135: 1369-80.

25

Kluth M, Graunke M, Moller-Koop C, Hube-Magg C, Minner S, Michl U, et al. Deletion of 18q is a strong and independent prognostic feature in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 86339-49.

26

Mohsenzadegan M, Shekarabi M, Madjd Z, Asgari M, Abolhasani M, Tajik N, et al. Study of NGEP expression pattern in cancerous tissues provides novel insights into prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Biomark Med. 2015; 9: 391-401.

27

Gobel C, Ozden C, Schroeder C, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Moller-Koop C, et al. Upregulation of centromere protein F is linked to aggressive prostate cancers. Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10: 5491-504.

28

Neubauer E, Latif M, Krause J, Heumann A, Armbrust M, Luehr C, et al. Up regulation of the steroid hormone synthesis regulator HSD3B2 is linked to early PSA recurrence in prostate cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2018; 105: 50-6.

29

Hoflmayer D, Willich C, Hube-Magg C, Simon R, Lang D, Neubauer E, et al. Snw1 is a prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2019; 14: 33.

30

Kunzelmann K, Ousingsawat J, Benedetto R, Cabrita I, Schreiber R. Contribution of anoctamins to cell survival and cell death. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11: 382.

31

Bates E. Ion channels in development and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2015; 31: 231-47.

32

Cheng Q, Chen A, Du Q, Liao Q, Shuai Z, Chen C, et al. Novel insights into ion channels in cancer stem cells (review). Int J Oncol. 2018; 53: 1435-41.

33

Ardeleanu C, Arsene D, Hinescu M, Andrei F, Gutu D, Luca L, et al. Pancreatic expression of dog1: a novel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) biomarker. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2009; 17: 413-8.

34

Carles A, Millon R, Cromer A, Ganguli G, Lemaire F, Young J, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma transcriptome analysis by comprehensive validated differential display. Oncogene. 2006; 25: 1821-31.

35

Dutertre M, Lacroix-Triki M, Driouch K, de la Grange P, Gratadou L, Beck S, et al. Exon-based clustering of murine breast tumor transcriptomes reveals alternative exons whose expression is associated with metastasis. Cancer Res. 2010; 70: 896-905.

36

Bonk S, Kluth M, Hube-Magg C, Polonski A, Soekeland G, Makropidi-Fraune G, et al. Prognostic and diagnostic role of PSA immunohistochemistry: a tissue microarray study on 21, 000 normal and cancerous tissues. Oncotarget. 2019; 10: 5439-53.

37

Fishilevich S, Nudel R, Rappaport N, Hadar R, Plaschkes I, Iny Stein T, et al. GeneHancer: genome-wide integration of enhancers and target genes in genecards. Database (Oxford). 2017; 2017: bax028.

38

Burdelski C, Menan D, Tsourlakis MC, Kluth M, Hube-Magg C, Melling N, et al. The prognostic value of SUMO1/Sentrin specific peptidase 1 (senp1) in prostate cancer is limited to ERG-fusion positive tumors lacking pten deletion. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15: 538.

39

Wu H, Wang H, Guan S, Zhang J, Chen Q, Wang X, et al. Cell-specific regulation of proliferation by Ano1/TMEM16A in breast cancer with different ER, PR, and HER2 status. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 84996-5013.

40

Guan L, Song Y, Gao J, Gao J, Wang K. Inhibition of calcium-activated chloride channel ANO1 suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis of epithelium originated cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 78619-30.

41

Britschgi A, Bill A, Brinkhaus H, Rothwell C, Clay I, Duss S, et al. Calcium-activated chloride channel ANO1 promotes breast cancer progression by activating EGFR and CAMK signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110: E1026-34.

Cancer Biology & Medicine
Pages 245-255
Cite this article:
Marx A, Koopmann L, Höflmayer D, et al. Reduced anoctamin 7 (ANO7) expression is a strong and independent predictor of poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2021, 18(1): 245-255. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0324

60

Views

0

Downloads

14

Crossref

16

Web of Science

15

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 25 September 2019
Accepted: 07 February 2020
Published: 01 February 2021
©2021 Cancer Biology & Medicine.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Return