AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (429.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Safety and efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (SCT200) as second-line therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Ming Bai1,*Meng Wang1,*Ting Deng1Yuxian Bai2Kai Zang3Zhanhui Miao4Wenlin Gai5Liangzhi Xie5,6,7Yi Ba1 ( )
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, China
Department of Medical Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China
Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453100, China
Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing 100176, China
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Beijing 100176, China
Cell Culture Engineering Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100176, China

*These authors contributed to the work equally.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

The mainstay treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) involves chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, alternative therapies are required for patients who are refractory or intolerant to existing therapies.

Methods

In this single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase Ⅰb study, 30 patients received an intravenous infusion of SCT200, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, 6.0 mg/kg once a week for 6 weeks, followed by 8.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled between July 2018 and May 2019. The ORR was 16.7% (95% CI: 5.6%–34.7%). The median PFS and OS were 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–4.3) and 6.8 months (95% CI: 4.7–10.1), respectively. A numerical difference without any statistical significance in ORR was observed in patients with different EGFR expressions (≥ 50%: 25.0% vs. < 50%: 0%, P = 0.140) or TP53 mutation abundance (< 10%: 23.8% vs. ≥ 10%: 0%, P = 0.286). Improved median PFS (3.4 vs. 1.4 months, P = 0.006) and OS (8.0 vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.027) were associated with TP53 mutation abundance of < 10%. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 (occurring in ≥ 2 patients) were hypomagnesemia [7 (23.3%)] and rash [2 (6.7%)]. No treatment-related death occurred.

Conclusions

SCT200 monotherapy as the second- or further-line treatment for advanced ESCC showed favorable efficacy, with an acceptable safety profile. TP53 mutation abundance might serve as a potential predictive biomarker.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cbm-19-3-358_ESM.pdf (454.1 KB)

References

1

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424.

2

Feng RM, Zong YN, Cao SM, Xu RH. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 global cancer statistics? Cancer Commun. 2019; 39: 22.

3

Arnold M, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut. 2015; 64: 381-7.

4

Kirschner AN, Wang J, van der Meer R, Anderson PD, Franco-Coronel OE, Kushner MH, et al. PIM kinase inhibitor AZD1208 for treatment of MYC-driven prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107: 1-11.

5

Muro K, Lordick F, Tsushima T, Pentheroudakis G, Baba E, Lu Z, et al. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: 34-43.

6

Shirakawa T, Kato K, Nagashima K, Nishikawa A, Sawada R, Takahashi N, et al. A retrospective study of docetaxel or paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who previously received fluoropyrimidine-and platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014; 74: 1207-15.

7

Mühr-Wilkenshoff F, Hinkelbein W, Ohnesorge I, Wolf KJ, Riecken EO, Zeitz M, et al. A pilot study of irinotecan (CPT-11) as single-agent therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003; 18: 330-4.

8

Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395: 497-506.

9

Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu C-H, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ keynote-181 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 4138-48.

10

Abedi-Ardekani B, Dar NA, Mir MM, Zargar SA, Lone MM, Martel-Planche G, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in central Asia. BMC cancer. 2012; 12: 602.

11

Jia J, Cui Y, Lu M, Wang X, Li J, Li J, et al. The relation of EGFR expression by immunohistochemical staining and clinical response of combination treatment of nimotuzumab and chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016; 18: 592-8.

12

Jia W, Wang W, Ji C-S, Niu J-Y, Lv Y-J, Zhou H-C, et al. Coexpression of periostin and EGFR in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and their prognostic significance. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9: 5133-42.

13

Song J, Shi W, Zhang Y, Sun M, Liang X, Zheng S. Epidermal growth factor receptor and B7-H3 expression in esophageal squamous tissues correlate to patient prognosis. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9: 6257-63.

14

Chen Y, Wu X, Bu S, He C, Wang W, Liu J, et al. Promising outcomes of definitive chemoradiation and cetuximab for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2012; 103: 1979-84.

15

Meng X, Wang J, Sun X, Wang L, Ye M, Feng P, et al. Cetuximab in combination with chemoradiotherapy in Chinese patients with non-resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective, multicenter phase Ⅱ trail. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 109: 275-80.

16

Lu M, Wang X, Shen L, Jia J, Gong J, Li J, et al. Nimotuzumab plus paclitaxel and cisplatin as the first line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer: a single centre prospective phase Ⅱ trial. Cancer Sci. 2016; 107: 486-90.

17

Liang J, E M, Wu G, Zhao L, Li X, Xiu X, et al. Nimotuzumab combined with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: preliminary study of a phase Ⅱ clinical trial. Onco Targets Ther. 2013; 6: 1589-96.

18

Suntharalingam M, Winter K, Ilson D, Dicker AP, Kachnic L, Konski A, et al. Effect of the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation therapy for patients with esophageal cancer: the NRG oncology RTOG 0436 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 1520-8.

19

De Castro Junior G, Segalla JG, De Azevedo SJ, Andrade CJ, Grabarz D, De Araújo Lima França B, et al. A randomised phase Ⅱ study of chemoradiotherapy with or without nimotuzumab in locally advanced oesophageal cancer: nice trial. Eur J Cancer. 2018; 88: 21-30.

20

Hu X, Jiang H, Bai W, Liu X, Miao Q, Wang L, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and targeted chemotherapy of SCT200-linker-monomethyl auristatin e conjugates. Eur J Med Chem. 2021; 216: 113297.

21

Weiner LM, Belldegrun AS, Crawford J, Tolcher AW, Lockbaum P, Arends RH, et al. Dose and schedule study of panitumumab monotherapy in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14: 502-8.

22

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised recist guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 228-47.

23

Huang J, Xu B, Liu Y, Huang J, Lu P, Ba Y, et al. Irinotecan plus S-1 versus S-1 in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (ESWN 01): a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-labeled phase 3 trial. Cancer Commun. 2019; 39: 16.

24

Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin C-Y, Chin K, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (attraction-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 1506-17.

25

Crosby T, Hurt CN, Falk S, Gollins S, Mukherjee S, Staffurth J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): a multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 627-37.

26

Zhang X, Jia J, Lu M, Wang X, Gong J, Li J, et al. Nimotuzumab plus paclitaxel and cisplatin as a 1(st)-line treatment for esophageal cancer: long term follow-up of a phase Ⅱ study. J Cancer. 2019; 10: 1409-16.

27

Chan JA, Blaszkowsky LS, Enzinger PC, Ryan DP, Abrams TA, Zhu AX, et al. A multicenter phase Ⅱ trial of single-agent cetuximab in advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22: 1367-73.

28

Gold PJ, Goldman B, Iqbal S, Leichman LP, Zhang W, Lenz HJ, et al. Cetuximab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma: a phase Ⅱ southwest oncology group study (S0415). J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5: 1472-6.

29

Kang N, Wang Y, Guo S, Ou Y, Wang G, Chen J, et al. Mutant TP53 G245C and R273H promote cellular malignancy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cell Biol. 2018; 19: 16.

30

Niyaz M, Ainiwaer J, Abudureheman A, Zhang L, Sheyhidin I, Turhong A, et al. Association between TP53 gene deletion and protein expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its prognostic significance. Oncol Lett. 2020; 20: 1855-65.

31

Wierzbicki R, Jonker DJ, Moore MJ, Berry SR, Loehrer PJ, Youssoufian H, et al. A phase Ⅱ, multicenter study of cetuximab monotherapy in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal carcinoma with absent epidermal growth factor receptor immunostaining. Invest New Drugs. 2011; 29: 167-74.

32

Maubec E, Petrow P, Scheer-Senyarich I, Duvillard P, Lacroix L, Gelly J, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of cetuximab as first-line single-drug therapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 3419-26.

33

Strumberg D, Schultheis B, Scheulen ME, Hilger RA, Krauss J, Marschner N, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of nimotuzumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Invest. New Drugs. 2012; 30: 1138-43.

34

Rischin D, Spigel DR, Adkins D, Wein R, Arnold S, Singhal N, et al. Prism: phase 2 trial with panitumumab monotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2016; 38 Suppl 1:E1756-61.

35

Siano M, Molinari F, Martin V, Mach N, Früh M, Freguia S, et al. Multicenter phase Ⅱ study of panitumumab in platinum pretreated, advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Oncologist. 2017; 22: 782-e70.

36

Terazawa T, Kato T, Goto M, Ohta K, Noura S, Satake H, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of panitumumab monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive frail or elderly patients with unresectable RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: OGSG 1602. Oncologist. 2020; 26: 17-e47.

Cancer Biology & Medicine
Pages 358-369
Cite this article:
Bai M, Wang M, Deng T, et al. Safety and efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (SCT200) as second-line therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2022, 19(3): 358-369. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0388

137

Views

1

Downloads

2

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 24 June 2021
Accepted: 21 October 2021
Published: 15 March 2022
©2022 Cancer Biology & Medicine.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Return