AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (427.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Real-world effectiveness and safety of goserelin 10.8-mg depot in Chinese patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer

Nanhui Chen1,*Zengjun Wang2,*Ming Chen3Qi Ma4Yi He5Yujie Wang6Xin Li7Mingxing Qiu8Lei Shi9Shaoxing Zhu10Qun Xie11Xiuheng Liu12Benkang Shi13Guowen Lin14Weizhong Yang15Yongbin Liao16Haibin Zhang17Shusheng Wang18Jiexian Li19Shaogang Wang20Lijun Dong21Hui Chen22Jiaju Lu23Yongyi Cheng24Xiaoping Zhang25Lulin Ma26Liqun Zhou27He Wang28Shen Li29 ( )Dingwei Ye14( )
Department of Urology, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou 514089, China
Department of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, China
Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
Translational Research Laboratory for Urology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315016, China
Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314050, China
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830091, China
Department of Urology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou 014016, China
Department of Urology, The People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610032, China
Department of Urology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264008, China
Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, China
Department of Urology, Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University, Zhuhai 519000, China
Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, HUST, Wuhan 430032, China
Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
Department of Urology, Huizhou Third People’s Hospital, Huizhou 516002, China
Department of Urology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen 529030, China
Department of Urology, Foshan First People’s Hospital, Foshan 528041, China
Department of Urology, Guangzhou Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China
Department of Urology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou 511489, China
Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430064, China
Department of Urology, Hebei Petro China Central Hospital (China National Petroleum Corporation Central Hospital), Langfang 065099, China
Department of Urology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150086, China
Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Department of Urology, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an 710021, China
Department of Urology, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430032, China
Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Xi’an 710024, China
Department of Urology, Shijiazhuang City First Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050012, China

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

Real-word data on long-acting luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists in Chinese patients with prostate cancer are limited. This study aimed to determine the real-world effectiveness and safety of the LHRH agonist, goserelin, particularly the long-acting 10.8-mg depot formulation, and the follow-up patterns among Chinese prostate cancer patients.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study in hormone treatment-naïve patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who were prescribed goserelin 10.8-mg depot every 12 weeks or 3.6-mg depot every 4 weeks with or without an anti-androgen. The patients had follow-up evaluations for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of goserelin in reducing serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The secondary outcomes included testosterone and PSA levels, attainment of chemical castration (serum testosterone<50 ng/dL), and goserelin safety. The exploratory outcome was the monitoring pattern for serum testosterone and PSA. All analyses were descriptive.

Results

Between September 2017 and December 2019, a total of 294 eligible patients received ≥ 1 dose of goserelin; 287 patients (97.6%) were treated with goserelin 10.8-mg depot. At week 24 ± 2, the changes from baseline [standard deviation (95% confidence interval)] in serum testosterone (n = 99) and PSA (n = 131) were −401.0 ng/dL [308.4 ng/dL (−462.5, −339.5 ng/dL)] and −35.4 ng/mL [104.4 ng/mL (−53.5, −17.4 ng/mL)], respectively. Of 112 evaluable patients, 100 (90.2%) achieved a serum testosterone level<50 ng/dL. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and severe TEAEs occurred in 37.1% and 10.2% of patients, respectively. The mean testing frequency (standard deviation) was 1.6 (1.5) for testosterone and 2.2 (1.6) for PSA.

Conclusions

Goserelin 10.8-mg depot effectively achieved and maintained castration and was well-tolerated in Chinese patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cbm-20-12-1047_ESM.pdf (536.5 KB)

References

1

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 209-49.

2

Wang F, Wang C, Xia H, Lin Y, Zhang D, Yin P, et al. Burden of prostate cancer in China, 1990-2019: findings from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13: 853623.

3

Chen R, Sjoberg DD, Huang Y, Xie L, Zhou L, He D, et al. Prostate specific antigen and prostate cancer in Chinese men undergoing initial prostate biopsies compared with western cohorts. J Urol. 2017; 197: 90-6.

4

Zhang L, Liu X, Xia R, Chen F, Wang X, Bao J, et al. Comparison of the clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer in US and Chinese populations. Pathol Res Pract. 2022; 234: 153933.

5

Siegel DA, O’Neil ME, Richards TB, Dowling NF, Weir HK. Prostate cancer incidence and survival, by stage and race/ethnicity - United States, 2001-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69: 1473-80.

6

Xu L, Wang J, Guo B, Zhang H, Wang K, Wang D, et al. Comparison of clinical and survival characteristics between prostate cancer patients of PSA-based screening and clinical diagnosis in China. Oncotarget. 2018; 9: 428-41.

7

Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Guidelines of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology: Prostate Cancer. People’s Medical Publishing House; 2021.

8
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Prostate Cancer. (Version 3. 2022), 2022. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1459.
9

Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, Heidenreich A, Ost P, Procopio G, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31: 1119-34.

10

Wang Q, Li Z, Yang J, Peng S, Zhou Q, Yao K, et al. Loss of NEIL3 activates radiotherapy resistance in the progression of prostate cancer. Cancer Biol Med. 2021; 19: 1193-210.

11

Seidenfeld J, Samson DJ, Hasselblad V, Aronson N, Albertsen PC, Bennett CL, et al. Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 566-77.

12

Weiner AB, Cohen JE, DeLancey JO, Schaeffer EM, Auffenberg GB. Surgical versus medical castration for metastatic prostate cancer: use and overall survival in a national cohort. J Urol. 2020; 203: 933-9.

13

Selvi I, Basar H. Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28: 4313-26.

14

Schally AV, Block NL, Rick FG. Discovery of LHRH and development of LHRH analogs for prostate cancer treatment. Prostate. 2017; 77: 1036-54.

15

Debruyne FM, Dijkman GA, Lee DC, Witjes WP, del Moral F, Karthaus HF, et al. A new long acting formulation of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue goserelin: results of studies in prostate cancer. J Urol. 1996; 155: 1352-4.

16

Gu W, Ye D. A survey of urologists on gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for prostate cancer. Chin J Urol. 2021; 42: 747-51.

17

Dijkman GA, Debruyne FM, Fernandez del Moral P, Plasman JW, Hoefakker JW, Idema JG, et al. A randomised trial comparing the safety and efficacy of the Zoladex 10.8-mg depot, administered every 12 weeks, to that of the Zoladex 3.6-mg depot, administered every 4 weeks, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 1995; 27: 43-6.

18

Fernandez del Moral P, Dijkman GA, Debruyne FM, Witjes WP, Kolvenbag GJ. Three-month depot of goserelin acetate: clinical efficacy and endocrine profile. Dutch South East Cooperative Urological Group. Urology. 1996; 48: 894-900.

19

Ishizuka O, Nishizawa O, Nishizawa S, Satoh T, Wajiki M, Kiyokawa H, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013; 18: 524-30.

20

Sarosdy MF, Schellhammer PF, Soloway MS, Vogelzang NJ, Crawford ED, Presti J, et al. Endocrine effects, efficacy and tolerability of a 10.8-mg depot formulation of goserelin acetate administered every 13 weeks to patients with advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int. 1999; 83: 801-6.

21

Zinner NR, Bidair M, Centeno A, Tomera K. Similar frequency of testosterone surge after repeat injections of goserelin (Zoladex) 3.6 mg and 10.8 mg: results of a randomized open-label trial. Urology. 2004; 64: 1177-81.

22

Ma S, Zhang J, Su X, Fan X, Jiao J, Cui C, et al. Risk factor analysis of patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Chin J Urol. 2022; 43: 35-9.

23

Fontana D, Mari M, Martinelli A, Boccafoschi C, Magno C, Turriziani M, et al. 3-month formulation of goserelin acetate (‘Zoladex’ 10.8-mg depot) in advanced prostate cancer: results from an Italian, open, multicenter trial. Urol Int. 2003; 70: 316-20.

24

Kaisary AV, Tyrrell CJ, Peeling WB, Griffiths K. Comparison of LHRH analogue (Zoladex) with orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Br J Urol. 1991; 67: 502-8.

25

Shore ND, Saad F, Cookson MS, George DJ, Saltzstein DR, Tutrone R, et al. Oral relugolix for androgen-deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 2187-96.

26

Shim M, Bang WJ, Oh CY, Lee YS, Cho JS. Effectiveness of three different luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the chemical castration of patients with prostate cancer: Goserelin versus triptorelin versus leuprolide. Investig Clin Urol. 2019; 60: 244-50.

27

Saad F, Fleshner N, Pickles T, Niazi T, Lukka H, Pouliot F, et al. Testosterone breakthrough rates during androgen deprivation therapy for castration sensitive prostate cancer. J Urol. 2020; 204: 416-26.

28

Wilke D, Patil N, Hollenhorst H, Bowes D, Rutledge R, Ago C. Testosterone suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists in patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Pharmacotherapy. 2018; 38: 327-33.

29

Berrondo C, Feng C, Kukreja JB, Messing EM, Joseph JV. Antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Urol Oncol. 2019; 37: 181.e7-e14.

30

Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol. 2000; 163: 418-22.

31
Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E; European Prostate Cancer Coalition/Europa UOMO, de Santis M, et al. EAU - EANM - ESTRO - ESUR - ISUP - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Eur Assoc Urol. 2022. Available from: https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAUEANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP_SIOG-Guidelines-on-ProstateCancer-2022.pdf
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Pages 1047-1059
Cite this article:
Chen N, Wang Z, Chen M, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of goserelin 10.8-mg depot in Chinese patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2023, 20(12): 1047-1059. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0335

211

Views

5

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 04 September 2023
Accepted: 04 December 2023
Published: 05 February 2024
©2023 Cancer Biology & Medicine.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Return