AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Neurorestoratology Article
PDF (9.6 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

In vitro study of neural stem cells and activated Schwann cells cocultured on electrospinning polycaprolactone scaffolds

Baoyou Fan1,2,*, Xianhu Zhou1,2,*, Lina Wang3,*, Zhijian Wei1,2, Wei Lin1,2, Yiming Ren1,2, Guidong Shi1,2, Xin Cheng1,2, Lianyong Wang3( ), Shiqing Feng1,2( )
International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Spinal Cord Injury, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital,
Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-neuroinjury Neuro-repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City,
Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background:

To investigate the biocompatibility of electrospinning polycaprolactone (PCL) fiber scaffolds and coculture system, which consisted of neural stem cells (NSCs) and activated Schwann cells (ASCs).

Materials and methods:

ASCs were isolated from sciatic nerves, ligated for 7 days, in 4-week-old Wistar rats, and the NSCs were isolated from the hippocampus of E14.5 Wistar rat embryos. ASCs, NSCs and ASCs combined with NSCs were 3D cultured on the electrospinning PCL fiber scaffolds. Crystal violet staining was used to find the suitable density of ASCs for growth, and the proliferation of NSCs and ASCs were tested by Cell Counting Kit (CCK)-8 assay, and cell adhesion, differentiation of NSCs and myelin basic protein (MBP) expression of ASCs were observed by laser confocal microscopy. Distribution and morphology were assessed by scanning electron microscopy.

Results:

The average diameter of fibers in electrospinning PCL scaffolds was approximately 7.93±1.41 μm. ASCs could grow well at the density of 2×104/cm2, and a certain number of cells extended along the longitudinal axis of fibers, and the shape of the cells was spindle, which was consistent with crystal violet staining results. The CCK-8 experiment showed ASCs could proliferate gradually on the PCL scaffold within 7 days, as well as NSCs, and NSCs differentiated into astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes on the PCL scaffold; PCL scaffolds could improve the differentiation rate of neurons. After NSCs and ASCs were cocultured on electrospinning PCL scaffolds, ASCs could express MBP and NSCs could differentiate into neurons, which distributed around those ASCs expressing MBP.

Conclusion:

Electrospinning PCL fibrous scaffolds showed good biocompatibility, and the fibers had an inducing effect on the distribution of ASCs. NSCs and ASCs cultured on electrospinning PCL scaffolds could form 3D culture system, and NSCs could differentiate into neurons which distributed around the ASCs expressing MBP.

Keywords

neural stem cellsSchwann cellsPCLscaffoldelectrospinning

References

1.
Mehrabi S, Eftekhari S, Moradi F, et al. Cell therapy in spinal cord injury: a mini-review. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2013;4(2):172–176.
Google Scholar
2.
Barnabé-Heider F, Frisén J. Stem cells for spinal cord repair. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(1):16–24.
Crossref Google Scholar
3.
Tremp M, Meyer Zu Schwabedissen M, Kappos EA, et al. The regeneration potential after human and autologous stem cell transplantation in a rat sciatic nerve injury model can be monitored by MRI. Cell Transplant. 2015;24(2):203–211.
Crossref Google Scholar
4.
Wei L, Wei ZZ, Jiang MQ, Mohamad O, Yu SP. Stem cell transplantation therapy for multifaceted therapeutic benefits after stroke. Prog Neurobiol. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Google Scholar
5.
Ronaghi M, Erceg S, Moreno-Manzano V, Stojkovic M. Challenges of stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury: human embryonic stem cells, endogenous neural stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells? Stem Cells. 2010;28(1):93–99.
Crossref Google Scholar
6.
Wiliams RR, Bunge MB. Schwann cell transplantation: a repair strategy for spinal cord injury? Prog Brain Res. 2012;201:295–312.
Crossref Google Scholar
7.
Silva NA, Sousa N, Reis RL, Salgado AJ. From basics to clinical: a comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;114:25–57.
Crossref Google Scholar
8.
Zhang Q, Nguyen P, Xu Q, et al. Neural progenitor-like cells induced from human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells regulate myelination of Schwann cells in rat sciatic nerve regeneration. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(2):458–470.
Crossref Google Scholar
9.
Barnett SC, Riddell JS. Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and the treatment of CNS injury: advantages and possible caveats. J Anat. 2004;204(1):57–67.
Crossref Google Scholar
10.
Liang P, Liu J, Xiong J, et al. Neural stem cell-conditioned medium protects neurons and promotes propriospinal neurons relay neural circuit reconnection after spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant. 2014;23 (Suppl 1):S45–S56.
Crossref Google Scholar
11.
Lu P, Wang Y, Graham L, et al. Long-distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury. Cell. 2012;150(6):1264–1273.
Crossref Google Scholar
12.
Sabelström H, Stenudd M, Réu P, et al. Resident neural stem cells restrict tissue damage and neuronal loss after spinal cord injury in mice. Science. 2013;342(6158):637–640.
Crossref Google Scholar
13.
Tao Li J, Somasundaram C, Bian K, et al. Nitric oxide signaling and neural stem cell differentiation in peripheral nerve regeneration. Eplasty. 2010;10:e42.
Google Scholar
14.
Dadon-Nachum M, Melamed E, Offen D. Stem cells treatment for sciatic nerve injury. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2011;11(12):1591–1597.
Crossref Google Scholar
15.
Piltti KM, Avakian SN, Funes GM, et al. Transplantation dose alters the dynamics of human neural stem cell engraftment, proliferation and migration after spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res. 2015;15(2):341–353.
Crossref Google Scholar
16.
Song S, Kamath S, Mosquera D, et al. Expression of brain natriuretic peptide by human bone marrow stromal cells. Exp Neurol. 2004;185(1):191–197.
Crossref Google Scholar
17.
Wu S, Suzuki Y, Kitada M, et al. Migration, integration, and differentiation of hippocampus-derived neurosphere cells after transplantation into injured rat spinal cord. Neurosci Lett. 2001;312(3):173–176.
Crossref Google Scholar
18.
Houweling DA, Lankhorst AJ, Gispen WH, Bär PR, Joosten EA. Collagen containing neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) attracts regrowing injured corticospinal axons in the adult rat spinal cord and promotes partial functional recovery. Exp Neurol. 1998;153(1):49–59.
Crossref Google Scholar
19.
Enomoto M. Therapeutic effects of neurotrophic factors in experimental spinal cord injury models. J Neurorestoratol. 2016;4(1):15–22.
Crossref Google Scholar
20.
Fon D, Zhou K, Ercole F, et al. Nanofibrous scaffolds releasing a small molecule BDNF-mimetic for the re-direction of endogenous neuroblast migration in the brain. Biomaterials. 2014;35(9):2692–2712.
Crossref Google Scholar
21.
Akassoglou K, Yu WM, Akpinar P, Strickland S. Fibrin inhibits peripheral nerve remyelination by regulating Schwann cell differentiation. Neuron. 2002;33(6):861–875.
Crossref Google Scholar
22.
Keilhoff G, Fansa H, Schneider W, Wolf G. In vivo predegeneration of peripheral nerves: an effective technique to obtain activated Schwann cells for nerve conduits. J Neurosci Methods. 1999;89(1):17–24.
Crossref Google Scholar
23.
Pearse DD, Barakat DJ. Cellular repair strategies for spinal cord injury. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2006;6(7):639–652.
Crossref Google Scholar
24.
Wang JM, Zeng YS, Wu JL, Li Y, Teng YD. Cograft of neural stem cells and schwann cells overexpressing TrkC and neurotrophin-3 respectively after rat spinal cord transection. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7454–7468.
Crossref Google Scholar
25.
Yang Y, Kamudzandu M, Roach P, Fricker R. Nanofibrous scaffolds supporting optimal central nervous system regeneration: an evidence-based review. J Neurorestoratol. 2015;3:123–131.
Crossref Google Scholar
26.
Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials. 2000;21(23):2335–2346.
Crossref Google Scholar
27.
Ng KW, Achuth HN, Moochhala S, Lim TC, Hutmacher DW. In vivo evaluation of an ultra-thin polycaprolactone film as a wound dressing. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2007;18(7):925–938.
Crossref Google Scholar
28.
Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(10):1217–1256.
Crossref Google Scholar
29.
Kim DY, Choi YS, Kim SE, et al. In vivo effects of adipose-derived stem cells in inducing neuronal regeneration in Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing nerve defect bridged with polycaprolactone nanotubes. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29 (Suppl 3):S183–S192.
Crossref Google Scholar
30.
Donoghue PS, Lamond R, Boomkamp SD, et al. The development of a ε-polycaprolactone scaffold for central nervous system repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(3–4):497–507.
Crossref Google Scholar
31.
Beigi MH, Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, et al. In vivo integration of poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous nerve guide seeded with teeth derived stem cells for peripheral nerve regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(12):4554–4567.
Crossref Google Scholar
32.
Azari H, Sharififar S, Rahman M, Ansari S, Reynolds BA. Establishing embryonic mouse neural stem cell culture using the neurosphere assay. J Vis Exp. 2011;(47):pii 2457.
Crossref Google Scholar
33.
Cho K-S, Pearse DD, Deitrich DW, et al. Schwann cell transplantation improves reticulo-spinal fiber growth and forelimb strength after severe cervical spinal cord contusion. Exp Neurol. 2007;193:239.
Google Scholar
34.
Hill CE, Hurtado A, Blits B, et al. Early necrosis and apoptosis of Schwann cells transplanted into the injured rat spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26(6):1433–1445.
Crossref Google Scholar
35.
Barakat DJ, Gaglani SM, Neravetla SR, et al. Survival, integration, and axon growth support of glia transplanted into the chronically contused spinal cord. Cell Transplant. 2005;14(4):225–240.
Crossref Google Scholar
36.
Pearse DD, Sanchez AR, Pereira FC, et al. Transplantation of Schwann cells and/or olfactory ensheathing glia into the contused spinal cord: survival, migration, axon association, and functional recovery. Glia. 2007;55(9):976–1000.
Crossref Google Scholar
37.
Niapour A, Karamali F, Nemati S, et al. Cotransplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors and schwann cells in a rat spinal cord contusion injury model elicits a distinct neurogenesis and functional recovery. Cell Transplant. 2012;21(5):827–843.
Crossref Google Scholar
38.
Wang X, Xu XM. Long-term survival, axonal growth-promotion, and myelination of Schwann cells grafted into contused spinal cord in adult rats. Exp Neurol. 2014;261:308–319.
Crossref Google Scholar
39.
Bunge MB. Efficacy of Schwann cell transplantation for spinal cord repair is improved with combinatorial strategies. J Physiol. 2016;594(13):3533–3538.
Crossref Google Scholar
40.
Thompson DM, Buettner HM. Neurite outgrowth is directed by schwann cell alignment in the absence of other guidance cues. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(1):161–168.
Crossref Google Scholar
41.
Xiang L, Chen Y. Stem cell transplantation for treating spinal cord injury: a literature comparison between studies of stem cells obtained from various sources. Neural Regen Res. 2012;7(16):1256–1263.
Google Scholar
42.
Sørensen A, Alekseeva T, Katechia K, Robertson M, Riehle MO, Barnett SC. Long-term neurite orientation on astrocyte monolayers aligned by microtopography. Biomaterials. 2007;28(36):5498–5508.
Crossref Google Scholar
43.
Ebrahimi-Barough S, Hoveizi E, Yazdankhah M, et al. Inhibitor of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway small molecule promotes motor neuron differentiation of human endometrial stem cells cultured on electrospun biocomposite polycaprolactone/collagen scaffolds. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;54(4):2547–2554.
Crossref Google Scholar
44.
Raspa A, Marchini A, Pugliese R, et al. A biocompatibility study of new nanofibrous scaffolds for nervous system regeneration. Nanoscale. 2016;8(1):253–265.
Crossref Google Scholar
45.
Wang J, Ye R, Wei Y, et al. The effects of electrospun TSF nanofiber diameter and alignment on neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(3):632–645.
Crossref Google Scholar
46.
Kamei KI, Koyama Y, Tokunaga Y, et al. Characterization of phenotypic and transcriptional differences in human pluripotent stem cells under 2D and 3D culture conditions. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(22):2951–2958.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Volume 5 Issue 1,
December 2017
Pages 155-165
DOI: 10.2147/JN.S139823
Cite this article:
Fan B, Zhou X, Wang L, et al. In vitro study of neural stem cells and activated Schwann cells cocultured on electrospinning polycaprolactone scaffolds. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2017, 5(1): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.2147/JN.S139823

660

Views

18

Downloads

6

Crossref

7

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics
Published: 06 September 2017
© 2017 The Author(s).

© 2017 Fan et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Return