AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (26.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Sliding-mode Observer-based Grid Voltage-observation Method with Frequency-fixed Dual SOGI and Cross-compensated Phase-locked Loop

Leilei GuoQingyang YeNan Jin( )Zhenkun LiuZhenjun Wu
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Conventional sliding-mode observer (SMO)-based grid-voltage observation methods often require a low-pass filter (LPF) to remove high-frequency sliding-mode noise. However, a complicated phase- and amplitude-compensation method, which is highly sensitive to the DC-offset, is required. A frequency-adaptive dual second-order generalized integrator (SOGI) can be used to replace the LPF, eliminating the compensation link and the effects of the DC-offset; however, strong coupling is introduced between the front-end SOGI block and back-end phase-locked loop (PLL) block, thereby reducing the dynamic performance. To solve this problem, this study proposes an SMO-based grid-voltage observation method with a frequency-fixed dual SOGI and cross-compensated PLL that can eliminate the frequency coupling between the front-end SOGI block and back-end PLL blocks, thereby increasing its dynamic performance. In this study, the phase and amplitude are compensated simultaneously using the proposed cross-compensation method, achieving an accurate observation of the grid voltage under off-nominal frequencies. An analysis of the small-signal model theoretically verified that the proposed method has good dynamic performance. Finally, the superiority of the proposed method is verified through comparative experiments.

Abstract

Conventional sliding-mode observer (SMO)-based grid-voltage observation methods often require a low-pass filter (LPF) to remove high-frequency sliding-mode noise. However, a complicated phase- and amplitude-compensation method, which is highly sensitive to the DC-offset, is required. A frequency-adaptive dual second-order generalized integrator (SOGI) can be used to replace the LPF, eliminating the compensation link and the effects of the DC-offset; however, strong coupling is introduced between the front-end SOGI block and back-end phase-locked loop (PLL) block, thereby reducing the dynamic performance. To solve this problem, this study proposes an SMO-based grid-voltage observation method with a frequency-fixed dual SOGI and cross-compensated PLL that can eliminate the frequency coupling between the front-end SOGI block and back-end PLL blocks, thereby increasing its dynamic performance. In this study, the phase and amplitude are compensated simultaneously using the proposed cross-compensation method, achieving an accurate observation of the grid voltage under off-nominal frequencies. An analysis of the small-signal model theoretically verified that the proposed method has good dynamic performance. Finally, the superiority of the proposed method is verified through comparative experiments.

References

[1]

O Babayomi, Z Zhang, Z Li, et al. Robust predictive control of grid-connected converters: Sensor noise suppression with parallel-cascade extended state observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2024, 71(4): 3728-3740.

[2]

G V Hollweg, P J D de O Evald, E Mattos, et al. A direct adaptive controller with harmonic compensation for grid-connected converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2024, 71(3): 2978-2989.

[3]

Q Guo, W Xiang, S Li. Circulating current suppression and power control of paralleled bidirectional interlinking converters in hybrid AC/DC microgrid. Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2022, 17(1): 31-40.

[4]

Y Zhang, Z Wang, J Jiao, et al. Grid-voltage sensorless model predictive control of three-phase PWM rectifier under unbalanced and distorted grid voltages. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2020, 35(8): 8663-8672.

[5]

M B Ketzer, C B Jacobina. Virtual flux sensorless control for shunt active power filters with quasi-resonant compensators. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2016, 31(7): 4818-4830.

[6]

A Rahoui, A Bechouche, H Seddiki, et al. Virtual flux estimation for sensorless predictive control of PWM rectifiers under unbalanced and distorted grid conditions. Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2021, 9(2): 1923-1937.

[7]

V T Le, H H Lee. Grid-voltage sensorless model-free predictive current control for PWM rectifiers with measurement noise suppression. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2022, 37(9): 10681-10697.

[8]
J Liu, W Wu, N Gao, et al. Design of observer-based active damping using disturbance observer for grid-connected inverter with LCL filter. 2018 IEEE International Power Electronics and Application Conference and Exposition (PEAC), November 4-7, Shenzhen, China. Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 1-6.
[9]

H Lu, X Cheng, W Qu, et al. A three-phase current reconstruction technique using single DC current sensor based on TSPWM. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2014, 29(3): 1542-1550.

[10]

A Rahoui, A Bechouche, H Seddiki, et al. Grid voltages estimation for three-phase PWM rectifiers control without AC voltage sensors. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2018, 33(1): 859-875.

[11]

R Guzman, L G de Vicuna, J Morales, et al. Model-based control for a three-phase shunt active power filter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(7): 3998-4007.

[12]

Y Cho, K Lee. Virtual-flux-based predictive direct power control of three-phase PWM rectifiers with fast dynamic response. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2016, 31(4): 3348-3359.

[13]

J Kukkola, M Hinkkanen. State observer for grid-voltage sensorless control of a converter under unbalanced conditions. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018, 54(1): 286-297.

[14]

L Guo, N Jin, Y Li, et al. A model predictive control method for grid-connected power converters without AC voltage sensors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(2): 1299-1310.

[15]

Y Li, W Li, L Guo, et al. Current sensor-less virtual synchronous generator model predictive control based on sliding mode observer. IEEE Access, 2021, 65(9): 17898-17908.

[16]

X Xiao, Y Zhang, X Song, et al. Virtual flux direct power control for PWM rectifiers based on an adaptive sliding mode observer. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2021, 54(5): 5196-5205.

[17]

H Kim, J Son, J Lee. A high-speed sliding-mode observer for the sensorless speed control of a PMSM. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2011, 58(9): 4069-4077.

[18]

C Wang, L Gou, S Dong, et al. Sensorless control of IPMSM based on super-twisting sliding mode observer with CVGI considering flying start. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2022, 8(2): 2106-2117.

[19]

Q An, J Zhang, Q An, et al. Frequency-adaptive complex-coefficient filter-based enhanced sliding mode observer for sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motor drives. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2020, 56(1): 335-343.

[20]

Q An, J Zhang, Q An, et al. Quasi-proportional-resonant controller based adaptive position observer for sensorless control of PMSM drives under low carrier ratio. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(4): 2564-2573.

[21]

G Zhang, G Wang, D Xu, et al. Multiple-AVF cross-feedback-network-based position error harmonic fluctuation elimination for sensorless IPMSM drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(2): 821-831.

[22]

Y Zhang, Z Yin, X Cao, et al. A novel SPMSM sensorless drive using discrete-time synchronous-frequency adaptive observer under low frequency ratio. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2022, 37(9): 11045-11057.

[23]

R Sreejith, B Singh. Sensorless predictive current control of PMSM EV drive using DSOGI-FLL based sliding mode observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(7): 5537-5547.

[24]

G Wang, D Li, Z Li, et al. Enhanced position observer using second-order generalized integrator for sensorless interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2014, 29(2): 486-495.

[25]

L Ding, Y W Li, N R Zargari. Discrete-time SMO sensorless control of current source converter-fed PMSM drives with low switching frequency. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(3): 2120-2129.

[26]

S Xu, Y Zhang, Y Hu, et al. Multiple open-switch fault diagnosis for three-phase four-leg inverter under unbalanced loads via interval sliding mode observer. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2024, 39(6): 7607-7619.

[27]

S Xu, X Xu, J Wang, et al. A simultaneous diagnosis approach for power switch, grid-side current sensor, and DC-link voltage sensor faults in single-phase three-level rectifiers. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73: 1-16.

[28]

F Xiao, L Dong, L Li, et al. A frequency-fixed SOGI-based PLL for single-phase grid-connected converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2017, 32(3): 1713-1719.

[29]

B Hoepfner, R Vick. A three-phase frequency-fixed DSOGI-PLL with low computational effort. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 34932-34941.

[30]

S Golestan, S Y Mousazadeh, J M Guerrero, et al. A critical examination of frequency-fixed second-order generalized integrator-based phase-locked loops. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2017, 32(9): 6666-6672.

[31]

S Golestan, M Monfared, F D Freijedo, et al. Dynamics assessment of advanced single-phase PLL structures. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013, 60(6): 2167-2177.

Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering
Pages 37-49
Cite this article:
Guo L, Ye Q, Jin N, et al. Sliding-mode Observer-based Grid Voltage-observation Method with Frequency-fixed Dual SOGI and Cross-compensated Phase-locked Loop. Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2024, 10(3): 37-49. https://doi.org/10.23919/CJEE.2024.000090

84

Views

11

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 15 May 2024
Revised: 20 July 2024
Accepted: 12 August 2024
Published: 30 September 2024
© 2024 China Machinery Industry Information Institute
Return