AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (11.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Research on Influencing Factors of Innovation Network Performance of Industrial Enterprises above Designated Size in Nanjing Based on System Dynamics

School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Based on the method of system dynamics, this paper simulates the cycle of collaborative innovation network, involving enterprises, government, research institutions, and science and technology intermediaries from the perspective of capital flow. The results of model analysis show that among the influencing factors, the number of innovation achievements is the most complex variable, and the influence of patent elimination rate is the most significant. The number of Research and Development (R&D) projects is most sensitive to the positive impact of the number of technology intermediaries, and with the passage of time, this kind of effect gradually increases. At the same time, the total industrial assets are positively affected by the intensity of enterprise innovation investment, but there is about three years delay in this effect.

References

[1]
C. X. Sheng, Thinking and countermeasures of promoting the conversion of new and old kinetic energy in the 14th Five-Year Plan period, (in Chinese), Reform, no. 2, pp. 5-19, 2020.
[2]
Y. B. He, The theoretical model of I-U-R collaborative innovation, (in Chinese), Stud. Sci. Sci., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 165-174, 2012.
[3]
M. X. Qiao and Y. M. Li, How does cooperative willingness affect innovation achievements transformation of university-industry collaboration, in Proc. 2015 Int. Conf. Management Science and Management Innovation, Guilin, China, 2015, pp. 524-529.
[4]
V. E. Dike, Leadership and management in the 21st century organizations: A practical approach, World J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 139-159, 2015.
[5]
D. C. Pai, C. Y. Tseng, and C. H. Liou, Collaborative innovation in emerging economies: Case of India and China, Innovation, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 467-476, 2012.
[6]
D. C. Zhu, C. Liu, and X. X. Li, A study on the organizational model of major scientific and technological projects under whole-nation system in the new period, (in Chinese), J. China Acad. Electron. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 299-305, 2020.
[7]
J. J. Guo and F. J. Xie, An empirical study on the determinants of collaborative innovation network formation: Based on the ERGM, (in Chinese), Chin. J. Manag., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 91-98, 2021.
[8]
Z. S. Luo, How to build an effective university collaborative innovation network system — Based on the analysis of Nanjing University of traditional Chinese Medicine, (in Chinese), Chin. Univ. Sci. Technol., no. 10, pp. 69-72, 2020.
[9]
Y. F. Wei, W. L. Shi, and P. N. Ruan, Research on synergy behavior and promotion strategy of enterprise innovation network based on evolutionary game theory, (in Chinese), Math. Pract. Theory, vol. 49, no. 23, pp. 18-30, 2019.
[10]
Q. Sun, R. Y. Hou, and G. S. Hailekiros, The effect of dual network embeddedness on enterprise innovation performance: An empirical study from structural perspective, in Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. Industrial Technology and Management, Cambridge, UK, 2017, pp. 47-54.
[11]
M. A. H. Npdp, Swarm creativity: Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks by Peter A. Gloor, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 407-408, 2007.
[12]
F. Feranita, J. Kotlar, and A. De Massis, Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research, J. Fam. Bus. Strategy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp, 137-156, 2017.
[13]
O. Neumann, C. Matt, B. S. Hitz-Gamper, L. Schmidthuber, and M. Stürmer, Joining forces for public value creation? Exploring collaborative innovation in smart city initiatives, Gov. Inf. Quart., vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101411, 2019.
[14]
X. Cao and C. Y. Li, Evolutionary game simulation of knowledge transfer in industry-university-research cooperative innovation network under different network scales, Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 4027, 2020.
[15]
L. F. Wang and Y. Hu, Does venture capital improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from China’s firm-level analysis, (in Chinese), J. Financ. Res., no. 1, pp. 177-190, 2017.
[16]
J. Y. Li and Y. Mu, Innovation performance of Chinese public companies based on DEA method, (in Chinese), Sci. of Sci. Manag. of S. & T., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 111-121, 2015.
[17]
H. B. Cong, D. L. Zou, and F. X. Wu, Influence mechanism of multi-network embeddedness to enterprises innovation performance based on knowledge management perspective, Cluster Comput., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 93-108, 2017.
[18]
S. Y. Liu, Impact mechanism of technological innovation policy on regional innovation performance: A case study of Henan province, (in Chinese), Areal Res. Dev., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 30-35, 2020.
[19]
D. M. You, Z. P. Li, and X. H. Yang, The influence path of high-tech enterprises innovation network capability on innovation network performance, (in Chinese), Sci. of Sci. Manag. of S. & T., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 70-82, 2015.
[20]
Y. D. Qiu, Research on innovation incentive effect of industry-university-research cooperation-Analysis based on different adjustment mechanisms, (in Chinese), Reform Econ. Syst., no. 5, pp. 107-112, 2020.
[21]
Y. Song, W. Elsner, Z. Y. Zhang, and R. Berger, Collaborative innovation and policy support: The emergence of trilateral networks, Appl. Econ., vol. 52, no. 34, pp. 3651-3668, 2020.
[22]
S. G. Liao and W. D. Xie, Research on the construction of China’s science and technology innovation service platform based on the perspective of collaborative innovation, Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 161-169, 2019.
[23]
Y. K. Jiang and Q. Mei, Empirical research on impact of social capital of scientific and technological intermediary on knowledge transfer-Taking the science and technology park of Nanjing University as an example, SHS Web Conf., vol. 24, p. 01001, 2016.
[24]
F. Yin, P. Zhang, Y. X. Lan, Y. X. Xia, Q. Zhang, and Z. Li, Research on internet rumors about emergencies based on the system dynamics model, (in Chinese), Inf. Sci., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 57-63, 2018.
[25]
B. Zhu and W. Q. Ou, Study on enterprise mainstream and new-stream innovation dynamic evolution based on system dynamic, (in Chinese), Sci. Technol. Prog. Policy, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 66-74, 2017.
[26]
M. J. Chi and L. Qiao, A skeletal review of the Sino-U.S. “trade war”: Contentious issues, trade multilateralism and policy recommendations, Can. Foreign Policy J., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 99-107, 2020.
[27]
S. H. Xi, F. Wang, and X. Y. Li, First-and second-order local and global sensitivity analyses on ignition delay times of four typical fuels, (in Chinese), Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 167-181, 2019.
[28]
Y. Yang and H. Xue, Study on regional diversity of industrial technology independent innovation capability, (in Chinese), China Industrial Economics, no. 11, pp. 68-76, 2010.
Complex System Modeling and Simulation
Pages 65-76
Cite this article:
Lu Y, Fang Y. Research on Influencing Factors of Innovation Network Performance of Industrial Enterprises above Designated Size in Nanjing Based on System Dynamics. Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 2021, 1(1): 65-76. https://doi.org/10.23919/CSMS.2021.0005

938

Views

67

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 13 December 2020
Revised: 16 March 2021
Accepted: 09 April 2021
Published: 30 April 2021
© The author(s) 2021

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return