AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Scheduling Storage Process of Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval Systems Based on Reinforcement Learning

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
School of Aviation, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval System (SBS/RS) has been widely studied because it is currently the most efficient automated warehousing system. Most of the related existing studies are focused on the prediction and improvement of the efficiency of such a system at the design stage. Hence, the control of existing SBS/RSs has been rarely investigated. In existing SBS/RSs, some empirical rules, such as storing loads column by column, are used to control or schedule the storage process. The question is whether or not the control of the storage process in an existing system can be improved further by using a different approach. The storage process is controlled to minimize the makespan of storing a series of loads into racks. Empirical storage rules are easy to control, but they do not reach the minimum makespan. In this study, the performance of a control system that uses reinforcement learning to schedule the storage process of an SBS/RS with fixed configurations is evaluated. Specifically, a reinforcement learning algorithm called the actor-critic algorithm is used. This algorithm is made up of two neural networks and is effective in making decisions and updating itself. It can also reduce the makespan relative to the existing empirical rules used to improve system performance. Experiment results show that in an SBS/RS comprising six columns and six tiers and featuring a storage capacity of 72 loads, the actor-critic algorithm can reduce the makespan by 6.67% relative to the column-by-column storage rule. The proposed algorithm also reduces the makespan by more than 30% when the number of loads being stored is in the range of 7-45, which is equal to 9.7%-62.5% of the systems’ storage capacity.

References

[1]
M. Fukunari and C. J. Malmborg, A network queuing approach for evaluation of performance measures in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems, Eur.J. Oper. Res., vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 152-167, 2009.
[2]
C. J. Malmborg, Conceptualizing tools for autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems, Int.J. Prod. Res., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1807-1822, 2002.
[3]
P. H. Kuo, A. Krishnamurthy, and C. J. Malmborg, Design models for unit load storage and retrieval systems using autonomous vehicle technology and resource conserving storage and dwell point policies, Appl. Math. Model., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2332-2346, 2007.
[4]
M. Fukunari and C. J. Malmborg, An efficient cycle time model for autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems, Int.J. Prod. Res., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3167-3184, 2008.
[5]
B. Y. Ekren, S. S. Heragu, A. Krishnamurthy, and C. J. Malmborg, Simulation based experimental design to identify factors affecting performance of AVS/RS, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 175-185, 2010.
[6]
B. Y. Ekren and S. S. Heragu, Simulation based performance analysis of an autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1640-1650, 2011.
[7]
B. Y. Ekren, S. S. Heragu, A. Krishnamurthy, and C. J. Malmborg, An approximate solution for semi-open queueing network model of an autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 205-215, 2013.
[8]
G. Marchet, M. Melacini, S. Perotti, and E. Tappia, Analytical model to estimate performances of autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems for product totes, Int.J. Prod. Res., vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 7134-7148, 2012.
[9]
T. Lerher, Modern automation in warehousing by using the shuttle based technology, in Automation Systems of the 21st Century: New Technologies, Applications and Impacts on the Environment & Industrial Processes, D. Arent and M. Freebush, eds. New York, NY, USA: Nova Publishers, 2013, p. 5186.
[10]
T. Lerher, Travel time model for double-deep shuttle-based storage and retrieval systems, Int.J. Prod. Res., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2519-2540, 2016.
[11]
T. Lerher, Throughput and Energy Related Performance Calculations for Shuttle Based Storage and Retrieval Systems, Energy Science, Engineering and Technology. New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, 2016.
[12]
N. Zhao, L. Luo, S. P. Zhang, and G. Lodewijks, An efficient simulation model for rack design in multi-elevator shuttle-based storage and retrieval system, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, vol. 67, pp. 100-116, 2016.
[13]
H. J. Carlo and I. F. A. Vis, Sequencing dynamic storage systems with multiple lifts and shuttles, Int.J. Prod. Econ., vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 844-853, 2012.
[14]
N. Zhao, L. Luo, and G. Lodewijks, Scheduling two lifts on a common rail considering acceleration and deceleration in a shuttle based storage and retrieval system, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 124, pp. 48-57, 2018.
[15]
J. B. Xin, C. Meng, F. Schulte, J. Z. Peng, Y. H. Liu, and R. R. Negenborn, A time-space network model for collision-free routing of planar motions in a multirobot station, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6413-6422, 2020.
[16]
T. Lerher, M. Ficko, and I. Palcic, Throughput performance analysis of Automated Vehicle Storage and Retrieval Systems with multiple-tier shuttle vehicles, Appl. Math. Model., vol. 91, pp. 1004-1022, 2021.
[17]
E. Tappia, D. Roy, R. de Koster, and M. Melacini, Modeling, analysis, and design insights for shuttle-based compact storage systems, Transp. Sci., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 269-295, 2016.
[18]
G. D’Antonio, M. De Maddis, J. S. Bedolla, P. Chiabert, and F. Lombardi, Analytical models for the evaluation of deep-lane autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system performance, Int.J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1811-1824, 2018.
[19]
B. P. Zou, X. H. Xu, Y. M. Gong, and R. De Koster, Modeling parallel movement of lifts and vehicles in tier-captive vehicle-based warehousing systems, Eur.J. Oper. Res., vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 51-67, 2016.
[20]
D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison, A. Guez, L. Sifre, G. van den Driessche, J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, V. Panneershelvam, M. Lanctot, et al., Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search, Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484-489, 2016.
[21]
J. Y. Hu, H. L. Niu, J. Carrasco, B. Lennox, and F. Arvin, Voronoi-based multi-robot autonomous exploration in unknown environments via deep reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 14413-14423, 2020.
[22]
A. G. Barto, R. S. Sutton, and C. W. Anderson, Neuronlike adaptive elements that can solve difficult learning control problems, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. SMC-13, no. 5, pp. 834-846, 1983.
Complex System Modeling and Simulation
Pages 131-144
Cite this article:
Luo L, Zhao N, Lodewijks G. Scheduling Storage Process of Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval Systems Based on Reinforcement Learning. Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 2021, 1(2): 131-144. https://doi.org/10.23919/CSMS.2021.0013

969

Views

84

Downloads

8

Crossref

8

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 07 April 2021
Revised: 25 May 2021
Accepted: 31 May 2021
Published: 30 June 2021
© The author(s) 2021

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return