AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Hierarchical Disturbance Propagation Mechanism and Improved Contract Net Protocol for Satellite TT&C Resource Dynamic Scheduling

School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK
School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The practical engineering of satellite tracking telemetry and command (TT&C) is often disturbed by unpredictable external factors, including the temporary rise in a significant quantity of satellite TT&C tasks, temporary failures and failures of some TT&C resources, and so on. To improve the adaptability and robustness of satellite TT&C systems when faced with uncertain dynamic disturbances, a hierarchical disturbance propagation mechanism and an improved contract network dynamic scheduling method for satellite TT&C resources were designed to address the dynamic scheduling problem of satellite TT&C resources. Firstly, the characteristics of the dynamic scheduling problem of satellite TT&C resources are analyzed, and a mathematical model is established with the weighted optimization objectives of maximizing the revenue from task completion and minimizing the degree of plan disturbance. Then, a bottom-up distributed dynamic collaborative scheduling framework for satellite TT&C resources is proposed, which includes a task layer, a resource layer, a central internal collaboration layer, and a central external collaboration layer. Dynamic disturbances are propagated layer by layer from the task layer to the central external collaboration layer in a bottom-up manner, using efficient heuristic strategies in the task layer and the resource layer, respectively. We use improved contract network algorithms in the center internal collaboration layer and the center external collaboration layer, the original scheduling plan is quickly adjusted to minimize the impact of disturbances while effectively completing dynamic task requirements. Finally, a large number of simulation experiments were carried out and compared with various comparative algorithms. The results show that the proposed algorithm can effectively improve the solution effect of satellite TT&C resource dynamic scheduling problems, and has good application prospects.

References

[1]
K . Han, R. Dong, F. Shao, W. Gong, and J. Chang, Dynamic topology optimization of navigation satellite inter-satellite links network based on improved genetic algorithm, (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 628–642, 2022.
[2]

W. Wang, Q. Z. Wang, G. F. Liu, H. Cheng, Y. Tao, and A. Guo, Countering unmanned ground system: A review of key technologies, (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 43, no. 7, p. 25489, 2022.

[3]

P. Fan, X. Cui, and M. Lu, Space and frequency diversity characterization of mobile GNSS receivers in multipath fading channels, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 294–301, 2020.

[4]

P. Wang, L. Yin, and J. Lu, Efficient helicopter−satellite communication scheme based on check-hybrid LDPC coding, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 323–332, 2018.

[5]

J. Wu, J. Xiong, H. Dai, Y. Wang, and C. Xu, MIX-RS: A multi-indexing system based on HDFS for remote sensing data storage, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 881–893, 2022.

[6]

Y. Xue, L. Li, Z. Wang, C. Jiang, M. Liu, J. Wang, K. Sun, and H. Ma, RFCNet: Remote sensing image super-resolution using residual feature calibration network, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 475–485, 2023.

[7]

Z. Wang, L. Li, L. Xing, J. Wang, K. Sun, and H. Ma, Information purification network for remote sensing image super-resolution, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 310–321, 2023.

[8]

G. Sun, S. Peng, H. Chen, J. Wu, and J. Li, Multi-objective optimization method oriented to integrated scenario of TT&C resources and data transmission resources, (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 43, no. 9, p. 326114, 2022.

[9]

J. Liang, X. J. Chen, J. P. Liu, D. Y. Yuan, and Q. Q. Luo, An optimization algorithm of space TT&C resource allocation for dynamic resource reservation, (in Chinese), Telecommunication Engineering, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1741–1750, 2022.

[10]

X. Li, J. Yang, and H. Fan, Dynamic network resource autonomy management and task scheduling method, Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1232, 2023.

[11]

J. N. Ma, L. P. Zhang, H. Dong, and Y. G. Lei, A multi-pattern effectiveness evaluation system for space TT&C network design and key technologies realization, (in Chinese), Telecommunication Engineering, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2023.

[12]

A. J. Vazquez and R. S. Erwin, On the tractability of satellite range scheduling, Optim. Lett., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 311–327, 2015.

[13]

R. Ansari, Dynamic optimization for analyzing effects of multiple resource failures on project schedule robustness, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1515–1532, 2021.

[14]

X. Gu, J. Bai, C. Zhang, and H. Gao, Study on TT&C resources scheduling technique based on inter-satellite link, Acta Astronaut., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2014.

[15]
H. Wang, X. Ma, Y. Han, F. Yao, and Y. Chen, An empirical study of heuristic rules on the performance of satellite TT&C scheduling algorithms, in Proc. IEEE 8th Joint Int. Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conf. (ITAIC), Chongqing, China, 2019, pp. 498–502.
[16]
Y. Xu, Y. Jiao, X. Pan, J. Wang, H. Zhou, and J. Cao, An efficient scheduling method for satellite TT&C resources, in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA), Chongqing, China, 2021, pp. 340–349.
[17]

J. Yan, L. Xing, C. Li, and Z. Zhang, Multicommodity flow modeling for the data transmission scheduling problem in navigation satellite systems, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 232–241, 2021.

[18]

Y. He, Y. Chen, J. Lu, C. Chen, and G. Wu, Scheduling multiple agile earth observation satellites with an edge computing framework and a constructive heuristic algorithm, J. Syst. Archit., vol. 95, pp. 55–66, 2019.

[19]

W. Yang, L. He, X. Liu, W. Meng, and Y. Chen, A fast insertion tabu search with conflict-avoidance heuristic for the multisatellite multimode crosslink scheduling problem, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 843–862, 2024.

[20]

M. Chen, J. Wen, Y. J. Song, L. N. Xing, and Y. W. Chen, A population perturbation and elimination strategy based genetic algorithm for multi-satellite TT&C scheduling problem, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 65, p. 100912, 2021.

[21]

T. Wang, Q. Luo, L. Zhou, and G. Wu, Space division and adaptive selection strategy based differential evolution algorithm for multi-objective satellite range scheduling problem, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 83, p. 101396, 2023.

[22]

H. Li, Y. Li, Q. Q. Meng, X. Li, L. Shao, and S. Zhao, An onboard periodic rescheduling algorithm for satellite observation scheduling problem with common dynamic tasks, Adv. Space Res., vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 5242–5253, 2024.

[23]

X. Long, W. Cai, L. Yang, and H. Huang, Improved particle swarm optimization with reverse learning and neighbor adjustment for space surveillance network task scheduling, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 85, p. 101482, 2024.

[24]

L. Wang, Z. Pan, and J. Wang, A review of reinforcement learning based intelligent optimization for manufacturing scheduling, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 257–270, 2021.

[25]

P. C. Luo, H. Q. Xiong, B. W. Zhang, J. Y. Peng, and Z. F. Xiong, Multi-resource constrained dynamic workshop scheduling based on proximal policy optimisation, Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 60, no. 19, pp. 5937–5955, 2022.

[26]

J. J. Zheng, N. T. Zhang, and L. Y. Zhang, Dynamic schedule model for rational utilize of TT&C system, (in Chinese), Chinese High Technology Letters, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 22–27, 2002.

[27]

H. M. Du and M. S. Liu, The method of satellite TT&C resources dynamic scheduling problem based on the technique of multi-agent collaboration, (in Chinese), Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 76–80, 2010.

[28]

Y. J. Liu, L. Wang, and Y. Y. Liu, Research on implementing technologies of dynamic resource restructuring for aerospace TT&C based on resource pooling, (in Chinese), Radio Engineering, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 699–703, 2018.

[29]

Y. Wang, D. Zhou, N. Song, M. Sheng, J. Li, and J. Liu, Concurrent reconfiguration of resource-oriented emergency TT&C mission planning for space information networks, J. Commun. Inf. Netw., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 142–152, 2021.

[30]

W. Zhang, T. Wu, H. Ma, Y. W. Jiao, and Y. Cai, Discussion on the development of integrated and intelligent space TTC&OC network, (in Chinese), Space-Integrated-Ground Information Networks, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 82–89, 2021.

[31]

P. Jin and K. Li, Distributed satellite resource scheduling based on improved contract network protocol, (in Chinese), System Engineering and Electronics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3164–3173, 2022.

[32]

Y. W. Liu, Q. R. Zhou, and H. Huang, Distributed satellite system dynamic task collaborative assignment algorithm, (in Chinese), Aerospace Control and Application, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 46–53, 2022.

[33]
W. Y. Yang and X. L. Liu, Multi-satellite autonomous coordination and mission planning based on dynamic contract network, in Proc. 6th China High Resolution Earth Observation Conference, Chengdu, China, 2019, pp. 231–258.
[34]

X. Pei, B. Li, M. Deng, G. Wu, X. Bai, and S. Huang, Dynamic collaborative planning method of earth observation resources based on contract network, J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1853–1862, 2020.

[35]

G. Wu, W. Pedrycz, H. Li, M. Ma, and J. Liu, Coordinated planning of heterogeneous earth observation resources, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 109–125, 2016.

[36]
C. Ma, D. Zhou, M. Sheng, H. Li, and J. Li, Dynamic TT&C mission scheduling for mega-satellite networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach, in Proc. GLOBECOM 2023—2023 IEEE Global Communications Conf., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2023, pp. 7163–7168.
[37]

B. Liu, M. Deng, G. Wu, X. Pei, H. Li, and W. Pedrycz, Bottom-up mechanism and improved contract net protocol for dynamic task planning of heterogeneous earth observation resources, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 6183–6196, 2022.

[38]

G. Wu, Q. Luo, X. Du, Y. Chen, P. N. Suganthan, and X. Wang, Ensemble of metaheuristic and exact algorithm based on the divide-and-conquer framework for multisatellite observation scheduling, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 4396–4408, 2022.

[39]

G. Wu, X. Mao, Y. Chen, X. Wang, W. Liao, and W. Pedrycz, Coordinated scheduling of air and space observation resources via divide-and-conquer framework and iterative optimization, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 3631–3642, 2023.

[40]

X. D. Ling, X. Y. Wu, Y. F. Li, Z. G. Zhu, and L. M. Zeng, Analysis on the developing trend of satellite TT&C scheduling, (in Chinese), Radio Engineering, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1788–1793, 2022.

[41]

T. Ren, S. Li, Y. He, C. Xiao, K. Zhang, G. Wu, and Z. Li, Recharge strategies for the electric vehicle routing problem with soft time windows and fast chargers, Int. J. Autom. Contr., vol. 15, nos. 4&5, p. 444, 2021.

[42]

Q. Wu, X. Xia, H. Song, H. Zeng, X. Xu, Y. Zhang, F. Yu, and H. Wu, A neighborhood comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization for the vehicle routing problem with time windows, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 84, p. 101425, 2024.

[43]

Y. Shen, L. Yu, and J. Li, Robust electric vehicle routing problem with time windows under demand uncertainty and weight-related energy consumption, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–34, 2022.

[44]

W. Yu, Y. Liao, and Y. Yang, Exact and approximation algorithms for the multi-depot capacitated arc routing problems, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 916–928, 2023.

[45]

B. Xu, K. Zhao, Q. Luo, G. Wu, and W. Pedrycz, A GV-drone arc routing approach for urban traffic patrol by coordinating a ground vehicle and multiple drones, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 77, p. 101246, 2023.

[46]

S. T. W. Mara, R. Sarker, D. Essam, and S. Elsayed, Solving electric vehicle–drone routing problem using memetic algorithm, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 79, p. 101295, 2023.

[47]

X. Wu, N. A. Xiao, and Q. Cui, Multi-objective flexible flow shop batch scheduling problem with renewable energy, Int. J. Autom. Contr., vol. 14, nos. 5&6, p. 519, 2020.

[48]

Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Han, J. Li, K. Gao, and Y. Nojima, Intelligent optimization under multiple factories: Hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with blocking constraints using an advanced iterated greedy algorithm, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 282–306, 2023.

[49]

X. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Meng, Y. Ren, R. Meng, and J. Li, An evolutionary algorithm for a hybrid flowshop scheduling problem with consistent sublots, Int. J. Autom. Contr., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–44, 2022.

[50]

E. Jiang, L. Wang, and J. Wang, Decomposition-based multi-objective optimization for energy-aware distributed hybrid flow shop scheduling with multiprocessor tasks, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 646–663, 2021.

[51]

H. Lu, S. Yang, M. Zhao, and S. Cheng, Multi-robot indoor environment map building based on multi-stage optimization method, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 145–161, 2021.

[52]

H. Wu and B. Wang, Minimising weighted completion time on a single machine under uncertain weights, Int. J. Autom. Contr., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 108–124, 2022.

[53]

D. Wang, K. Yang, X. Gao, and H. Wang, Decision optimisation of a mobile robot in a complex environment based on memory sequence replay mechanism, Int. J. Autom. Contr., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 461–486, 2023.

[54]

B. Wang, K. Feng, and X. Wang, Bi-objective scenario-guided swarm intelligent algorithms based on reinforcement learning for robust unrelated parallel machines scheduling with setup times, Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 80, p. 101321, 2023.

[55]

B. Wu, S. Bai, B. Rajbhandari, B. Li, and K. Wang, Quantity flexibility contract model for emergency procurement considering supply disruption, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 2023.

[56]

M. Tan, Z. Zhang, Y. Ren, I. Richard, and Y. Zhang, Multi-agent system for electric vehicle charging scheduling in parking lots, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 129–142, 2023.

[57]

Z. Liao and S. Li, Solving nonlinear equations systems with an enhanced reinforcement learning based differential evolution, Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 78–95, 2022.

[58]

F. Angel-Bello, J. Vallikavungal, and A. Alvarez, Two approaches to handle the dynamism in a scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 167, p. 114137, 2021.

[59]

G. H. Wu and T. Y. Wang, Large-scale constellation TT&C resource scheduling method based on adaptive simulated annealing algorithm, (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 44, no. 12, p. 327759, 2023.

[60]

C. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Ma, W. Song, Z. Le, Z. Cao, and J. Zhang, A review on learning to solve combinatorial optimisation problems in manufacturing, IET Collab. Intell. Manuf., vol. 5, no. 1, p. e12072, 2023.

[61]

J. J. Wang and L. Wang, A knowledge-based cooperative algorithm for energy-efficient scheduling of distributed flow-shop, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1805–1819, 2020.

[62]

G. Wu, H. Wang, W. Pedrycz, H. Li, and L. Wang, Satellite observation scheduling with a novel adaptive simulated annealing algorithm and a dynamic task clustering strategy, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 113, pp. 576–588, 2017.

[63]

X. M. Li, X. J. Chen, G. H. Wu, C. He, and Y. J. Long, Scheduling model and heuristic algorithm for tracking and data relay satellite considering break-point transmission, (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 40, no. 11, p. 323233, 2019.

[64]

X. M. Li, W. K. Liao, G. H. Wu, H. K. Chen, H. Lu, and X. J. Chen, A two-stage iterative optimization method for the coordinated task planning of space and air observation resources, (in Chinese), Control and Decision, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1147–1156, 2021.

[65]

R. R. Wang, W. L. Wei, M. C. Yang, and W. Liu, Task allocation of multiple UAVs considering cooperative route planning, (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 41, no. S2, p. 724234, 2020.

[66]

J. Zhang, G. Wang, and Y. Song, Task assignment of the improved contract net protocol under a multi-agent system, Algorithms, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 70, 2019.

[67]

G. H. Wu, X. Du, X. W. Wang, X. J. Chen, W. F. Zhang, and C. H. Mao, Multi-satellite emergency scheduling algorithm considering dynamic selection of neighborhood structure, (in Chinese), Control and Decision, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1685–1694, 2022.

Complex System Modeling and Simulation
Pages 166-183
Cite this article:
Xiang Z, Gu Y, Wang X, et al. Hierarchical Disturbance Propagation Mechanism and Improved Contract Net Protocol for Satellite TT&C Resource Dynamic Scheduling. Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 2024, 4(2): 166-183. https://doi.org/10.23919/CSMS.2024.0004

195

Views

9

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 14 March 2024
Revised: 25 March 2024
Accepted: 30 March 2024
Published: 30 June 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return