AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Developing an Integrated IoT Cloud Based Predictive Conservation Model for Asset Management in Industry 4.0

Department of Computer Applications, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Karakambadi, Tirupathi 517520, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Karakambadi, Tirupathi 517520, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

With the advent of Industry 4.0 (I4.0), predictive maintenance (PdM) methods have been widely adopted by businesses to deal with the condition of their machinery. With the help of I4.0, digital transformation, information techniques, computerised control, and communication networks, large amounts of data on operational and process conditions can be collected from multiple pieces of equipment and used to make an automated fault detection and diagnosis, all with the goal of reducing unscheduled maintenance, improving component utilisation, and lengthening the lifespan of the equipment. In this paper, we use smart approaches to create a PdM planning model. The five key steps of the created approach are as follows: (1) cleaning the data, (2) normalising the data, (3) selecting the best features, (4) making a decision about the prediction network, and (5) producing a prediction. At the outset, PdM-related data undergo data cleaning and normalisation to get everything in order and within some kind of bounds. The next step is to execute optimal feature selection in order to eliminate unnecessary data. This research presents the golden search optimization (GSO) algorithm, a powerful population-based optimization technique for efficient feature selection. The first phase of GSO is to produce a set of possible solutions or objects at random. These objects will then interact with one another using a straightforward mathematical model to find the best feasible answer. Due to the wide range over which the prediction values fall, machine learning and deep learning confront challenges in providing reliable predictions. This is why we recommend a multilayer hybrid convolution neural network (MLH-CNN). While conceptually similar to VGGNet, this approach uses fewer parameters while maintaining or improving classification correctness by adjusting the amount of network modules and channels. The projected perfect is evaluated on two datasets to show that it can accurately predict the future state of components for upkeep preparation.

References

[1]

M. Nagy and G. Lăzăroiu, Computer vision algorithms, remote sensing data fusion techniques, and mapping and navigation tools in the Industry 4.0-based Slovak automotive sector, Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 19, p. 3543, 2022.

[2]

H. Nordal and I. El-Thalji, Modeling a predictive maintenance management architecture to meet Industry 4.0 requirements: A case study, Syst. Eng., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 34–50, 2021.

[3]

M. Drakaki, Y. L. Karnavas, P. Tzionas, and I. D. Chasiotis, Recent developments towards Industry 4.0 oriented predictive maintenance in induction motors, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 180, pp. 943–949, 2021.

[4]

S. Sajid, A. Haleem, S. Bahl, M. Javaid, T. Goyal, and M. Mittal, Data science applications for predictive maintenance and materials science in context to Industry 4.0, Mater. Today, vol. 45, pp. 4898–4905, 2021.

[5]
A. T. Prihatno, H. Nurcahyanto, and Y. M. Jang, Predictive maintenance of relative humidity using random forest method, in Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2021, pp. 497–499.
[6]

A. Sahli, R. Evans, and A. Manohar, Predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Current themes, Procedia CIRP, vol. 104, pp. 1948–1953, 2021.

[7]
R. M. Koushik, A. Perichiappan, H. Om, A. Banerji, S. Eswaran, and P. Honnavalli, Generation of true random numbers using entropy sources present within portable computers, in Proc. 2021 IEEE Int. Conf. Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), Bangalore, India, 2021, pp. 1–6.
[8]

Y. K. Teoh, S. S. Gill, and A. K. Parlikad, IoT and fog-computing-based predictive maintenance model for effective asset management in Industry 4.0 using machine learning, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2087–2094, 2021.

[9]
G. Kothai, E. Poovammal, G. Dhiman, K. Ramana, A. Sharma, M. A. AlZain, G. S. Gaba, and M. Masud, A new hybrid deep learning algorithm for prediction of wide traffic congestion in smart cities, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 2021, p. 5583874, 2021.
[10]
E. M. Bourezza and A. Mousrij, Towards a platform to implement an intelligent and predictive maintenance in the context of Industry 4.0, in Proc. Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence & Industrial Applications (A2IA2020), Meknes, Morocco, 2020, pp. 33–44.
[11]
N. Boddu, V. Boba, and R. Vatambeti, A novel georouting potency based optimum spider monkey approach for avoiding congestion in energy efficient mobile ad-hoc network, Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 127, pp. 1157–1186, 2022.
[12]

M. Pech, J. Vrchota, and J. Bednář, Predictive maintenance and intelligent sensors in smart factory: Review, Sensors ( Basel), vol. 21, no. 4, p. 1470, 2021.

[13]
V. G. Biradar, H. C. Nagaraj, S. G. Mohan, and P. K. Pareek, Industrial fluids components health management using deep learning, https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/85083, 2022.
[14]

A. Pollak, S. Temich, W. Ptasiński, J. Kucharczyk, and D. Gąsiorek, Prediction of belt drive faults in case of predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0 platform, Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 21, p. 10307, 2021.

[15]

K. Aksa, S. Aitouche, H. Bentoumi, and I. Sersa, Developing a web platform for the management of the predictive maintenance in smart factories, Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 1469–1497, 2021.

[16]

R. Rosati, L. Romeo, G. Cecchini, F. Tonetto, P. Viti, A. Mancini, and E. Frontoni, From knowledge-based to big data analytic model: A novel IoT and machine learning based decision support system for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0, J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 107–121, 2023.

[17]
C. Zhang, G. Zhou, J. Li, F. Chang, K. Ding, and D. Ma, A multi-access edge computing enabled framework for the construction of a knowledge-sharing intelligent machine tool swarm in Industry 4.0, J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 66, pp. 56–70, 2023.
[18]

I. Ullah, U. U. Hassan, and M. I. Ali, Multi-level federated learning for Industry 4.0—A crowdsourcing approach, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 217, pp. 423–435, 2023.

[19]

G. Converso, M. Gallo, T. Murino, and S. Vespoli, Predicting failure probability in Industry 4.0 production systems: A workload-based prognostic model for maintenance planning, Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1938, 2023.

[20]
P. Murugiah, A. Muthuramalingam, and S. Anandamurugan, A design of predictive manufacturing system in IoT-assisted Industry 4.0 using heuristic-derived deep learning, Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 36, no. 5, p. e5432, 2023.
[21]

S. Liu and L. N. Vicente, Accuracy and fairness trade-offs in machine learning: A stochastic multi-objective approach, Comput. Manag. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 513–537, 2022.

[22]
Q. Cao, C. Zanni-Merk, A. Samet, C. Reich, F. D. B. D. Beuvron, A. Beckmann, and C. Giannetti, KSPMI: A knowledge-based system for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0, Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 74, p. 102281, 2022.
[23]
S. Farahani, V. Khade, S. Basu, and S. Pilla, A data-driven predictive maintenance framework for injection molding process, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 80, pp. 887–897, 2022.
[24]

K. Singh and S. Upadhyaya, Outlier detection: Applications and techniques, Int. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 307–323, 2012.

[25]
W. Deng, Y. Guo, J. Liu, Y. Li, D. Liu, and L. Zhu, A missing power data filling method based on improved random forest algorithm, Chin. J. Electr. Eng., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 33–39, 2019.
[26]
S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, in Proc. 32 nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, 2015, pp. 448–456.
[27]
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1412.6980, 2014.
[28]
A. Desai, Predictive maintenance (PdM) of aircraft engine, https://github.com/archd3sai/Predictive-Maintenance-of-Aircraft-Engine, 2022.
Journal of Social Computing
Pages 139-149
Cite this article:
Shanmugam K, Satyam K, Reddy TRS. Developing an Integrated IoT Cloud Based Predictive Conservation Model for Asset Management in Industry 4.0. Journal of Social Computing, 2023, 4(2): 139-149. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2023.0011

549

Views

59

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 24 March 2023
Revised: 03 June 2023
Accepted: 25 June 2023
Published: 30 June 2023
© The author(s) 2023.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return