Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
In recent decades, social scientists have debated declining levels of trust in American institutions. At the same time, many American institutions are coming under scrutiny for their use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. This paper analyzes the results of a survey experiment over a nationally representative sample to gauge the effect that the use of AI has on the American public’s trust in their social institutions, including government, private corporations, police precincts, and hospitals. We find that artificial intelligence systems were associated with significant trust penalties when used by American police precincts, companies, and hospitals. These penalties were especially strong for American police precincts and, in most cases, were notably stronger than the trust penalties associated with the use of smartphone apps, implicit bias training, machine learning, and mindfulness training. Americans’ trust in institutions tends to be negatively impacted by the use of new tools. While there are significant variations in trust between different pairings of institutions and tools, generally speaking, institutions which use AI suffer the most significant loss of trust. American government agencies are a notable exception here, receiving a small but puzzling boost in trust when associated with the use of AI systems.
C. A. Latkin, L. Dayton, G. Yi, A. Konstantopoulos, and B. Boodram, Trust in a COVID-19 vaccine in the U. S.: A social-ecological perspective, Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 270, p. 113684, 2021.
P. Markey and C. Ferguson, Teaching us to fear: The violent video game moral panic and the politics of game research, Am. J. Play., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 99–115, 2017.
R. Inglehart, Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 880–900, 1981.
P. Paxton, Trust in decline, Contexts, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2005.
R. D. Putnam, Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital, J. Democr., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 1995.
I. Kawachi, B. P. Kennedy, K. Lochner, and D. Prothrow-Stith, Social capital, income inequality, and mortality, Am. J. Public Health, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 1491–1498, 1997.
O. P. Hastings, Less equal, less trusting? Longitudinal and cross-sectional effects of income inequality on trust in U. S. States, 1973–2012, Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 74, pp. 77–95, 2018.
S. Van de Walle, S. Van Roosbroek, and G. Bouckaert, Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline, Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 2008.
A. K. Clark, Rethinking the decline in social capital, Am. Polit. Res., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 569–601, 2015.
J. M. Twenge, W. K. Campbell, and N. T. Carter, Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972–2012, Psychol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1914–1923, 2014.
J. Mewes, M. Fairbrother, G. N. Giordano, C. Wu, and R. Wilkes, Experiences matter: A longitudinal study of individual-level sources of declining social trust in the United States, Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 95, p. 102537, 2021.
B. B. Neves, Social capital and Internet use: The irrelevant, the bad, and the good, Sociol. Compass, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 599–611, 2013.
B. J. Dietvorst, J. P. Simmons, and C. Massey, Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 114–126, 2015.
J. M. Logg, J. A. Minson, and D. A. Moore, Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 151, pp. 90–103, 2019.
T. Lumley, Analysis of complex survey samples, J. Stat. Soft., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1–19, 2004.
P. Wang, On defining artificial intelligence, Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, vol. 10, pp. 1–37, 2019.
D. Monett, C. W. P. Lewis, K. R. Thórisson, J. Bach, G. Baldassarre, G. Granato, I. S. N. Berkeley, F. Chollet, M. Crosby, H. Shevlin, et al., Special issue “on defining artificial intelligence”—Commentaries and author’s response, J. Artif. Gen. Intell., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–100, 2020.
I. Hermann, Artificial intelligence in fiction: Between narratives and metaphors, AI Soc., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 319–329, 2023.
J. Kleinberg, H. Lakkaraju, J. Leskovec, J. Ludwig, and S. Mullainathan, Human decisions and machine predictions, Q. J. Econ., vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 237–293, 2018.
The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).