AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (324.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Hypothesis and Thought Experiment: Comparing Cognitive Competition of Neandertals and Early Humans, to Our Coming Contest with AIs

The Human Sentience Project LLC, Tucson, AZ 85704, USA
Department of Astronomy, Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

The history of how Homo sapiens out-survived the Neanderthals is recalled here with the goal of conceiving an edge in our coming competition with a faster, stronger artificial intelligence (AI) who has far greater capacity for information storage. The social and cognitive differences between the two hominid species, Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis, are described. Based on findings from genomics, neuroscience, archaeology, and paleobiology, it appears possible that the capacities of Homo sapiens could outreach those of AIs in some ways. Especially important are human visuospatial, cultural, and, oddly enough, theological capacities, and the interaction of these capacities in group problem-solving. While communication between AIs is fast and can be widespread, the authors ask whether this is the right kind of communication for solving problems of survival. An important question is explored throughout: Is it ethical to withhold from AIs human-like capacities that may become possible to install? Finally, a worrisome question is broached: Is it the best course to create AIs in our own image to safeguard our existence in unknown future interactions with extraterrestrial species, both organic and inorganic?

References

[1]

K. Harvati, C. Röding, A. M. Bosman, F. A. Karakostis, R. Grün, C. Stringer, P. Karkanas, N. C. Thompson, V. Koutoulidis, L. A. Moulopoulos, et al., Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia, Nature, vol. 571, no. 7766, pp. 500–504, 2019.

[2]
S. Pääbo, Neanderthal Man: In Search of Lost Genomes. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 2014.
[3]

L. G. Dean, R. L. Kendal, S. J. Schapiro, B. Thierry, and K. N. Laland, Identification of the social and cognitive processes underlying human cumulative culture, Science, vol. 335, no. 6072, pp. 1114–1118, 2012.

[4]

T. Wynn and F. L. Coolidge, The inner neanderthal, New Scientist, no. 2847, pp. 26–27, 2012.

[5]
B. H. Smith, The physiological age of KNM-WT 15000, in The Nariokotome Homo Erectus Skeleton, A. Walker and R. Leakey, eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1993, pp. 195–220.
[6]
J. R. Carey, Longevity: The Biology and Demography of Life Span. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2021.
[7]

K. Hawkes, Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity, Am. J. Hum. Biol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 380–400, 2003.

[8]
F. L. Coolidge and T. G. Wynn, The Rise of Homo Sapiens: The Evolution of Modern Thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[9]

E. Bruner and A. Iriki, Extending mind, visuospatial integration, and the evolution of the parietal lobes in the human genus, Quat. Int., vol. 405, pp. 98–110, 2016.

[10]
M. B. Rappaport and C. J. Corbally, The Emergence of Religion in Human Evolution. London, UK: Routledge, 2019.
[11]
T. Wynn and F. L. Coolidge, How to Think Like a Neandertal. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[12]

A. Gómez-Robles, Dental evolutionary rates and its implications for the Neanderthal-modern human divergence, Sci. Adv., vol. 5, no. 5, p. eaaw1268, 2019.

[13]

S. Wroe, W. C. H. Parr, J. A. Ledogar, J. Bourke, S. P. Evans, L. Fiorenza, S. Benazzi, J. J. Hublin, C. Stringer, O. Kullmer, et al., Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting, Proc. Biol. Sci., vol. 285, no. 1876, p. 20180085, 2018.

[14]
E. E. Harris, Ancestors in Our Genome: The New Science of Human Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2015.
[15]
C. M. Vicario, FOXP2 gene and language development: The molecular substrate of the gestural-origin theory of speech? Front. Behav. Neurosci. , vol. 7, p. 99, 2013.
[16]
H. Takahashi, K. Takahashi, and F. C. Liu, FOXP genes, neural development, speech and language disorders, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7023/, 2013.
[17]
A. Gómez-Robles and C. C. Sherwood, Human brain evolution: How the increase of brain plasticity made us a cultural species, Mètode Rev. De Difusió De La Investig.
[18]
X. Sun, H. Cheng, J. Li, B. Liu, and J. Guan, All in one: Multi-task prompting for graph neural networks, in Proc. 29th ACM SIGKDD Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 2023, pp. 2120–2131.
[19]
X. Sun, J. Zhang, X. Wu, H. Cheng, Y. Xiong, and J. Li, Graph prompt learning: A comprehensive survey and beyond, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2311.16534, 2023.
[20]
Y. Li, X. Sun, H. Chen, S. Zhang, Y. Yang, and G. Xu, Attention is not the only choice: Counterfactual reasoning for path-based explainable recommendation, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.
[21]

T. Wynn and F. L. Coolidge, The expert Neandertal mind, J. Hum. Evol., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 467–487, 2004.

[22]
H. C. Tanabe, D. Kubo, K. Hasegawa, T. Kochiyama, and O. Kondo, Cerebellum: Anatomy, physiology, function, and evolution, in Digital Endocasts: From Skulls to Brains, E. Bruner, N. Ogihara, and H. C. Tanabe, eds. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, 2018, pp. 275–289.
[23]

J. B. Smaers, A. Gómez-Robles, A. N. Parks, and C. C. Sherwood, Exceptional evolutionary expansion of prefrontal cortex in great apes and humans, Curr. Biol., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 714–720, 2017.

Journal of Social Computing
Pages 122-131
Cite this article:
Rappaport MB, Corbally CJ. Hypothesis and Thought Experiment: Comparing Cognitive Competition of Neandertals and Early Humans, to Our Coming Contest with AIs. Journal of Social Computing, 2024, 5(2): 122-131. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2024.0012

62

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 27 February 2024
Revised: 05 June 2024
Accepted: 12 June 2024
Published: 30 June 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return