AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Prolonging dual antiplatelet therapy improves the long-term prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention

Jing-Jing XU1Si-Da JIA1Pei ZHU1Ying SONG1De-Shan YUAN1Xue-Yan ZHAO1Yi YAO1Lin JIANG1Jian-Xin LI1Yin ZHANG1Lei SONG1Run-Lin GAO1Ya-Ling HAN2( )Jin-Qing YUAN1( )
Department of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) requiring complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 2403 patients with DM who underwent complex PCI from January to December 2013 were consecutively enrolled in this observational cohort study and divided according to DAPT duration into a standard group (11–13 months, n = 689) and two prolonged groups (13–24 months, n = 1133; > 24 months, n = 581).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, angiographic findings, and complexity of PCI were comparable regardless of DAPT duration. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event was lower when DAPT was 13–24 months than when it was 11–13 months or > 24 months (4.6% vs. 8.1% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.008), as was the incidence of all-cause death (1.9% vs. 4.6% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.002) and cardiac death (1.0% vs. 3.0% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.002). After adjustment for confounders, DAPT for 13–24 months was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.544, 95% CI: 0.373–0.795] and all-cause death (HR = 0.605, 95% CI: 0.387–0.944). DAPT for > 24 months was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR = 0.681, 95% CI: 0.493–0.942) and cardiac death (HR = 0.620, 95% CI: 0.403–0.952). The risk of major bleeding was not increased by prolonging DAPT to 13–24 months (HR = 1.356, 95% CI: 0.766–2.401) or > 24 months (HR = 0.967, 95% CI: 0.682–1.371).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with DM undergoing complex PCI, prolonging DAPT might improve the long-term prognosis by reducing the risk of adverse ischemic events without increasing the bleeding risk.

References

[1]

Palmerini T, Stone GW. Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: conceptual evolution based on emerging evidence. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 353−364.

[2]

Naito R, Miyauchi K. Coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int Heart J 2017; 58: 475−480.

[3]

Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 2155−2166.

[4]
Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation 2016; 134: e123–e155.
[5]

Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541−2619.

[6]

Section of Interventional Cardiology of Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association; Specialty Committee on Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis of Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention (2016)]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2016; 44: 382−400. [In Chinese].

[7]

Xu J, Song Y, Gao Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of extending dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome: a large single-center study. Platelets 2020; 31: 869−876.

[8]

Chinese Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Treatment of Clinical Guidelines Writing Group; Geriatric Endocrinology and Metabolism Branch of Chinese Geriatric Society; Geriatric Endocrinology and Metabolism Branch of Chinese Geriatric Health Care Society; Geriatric Professional Committee of Beijing Medical Award Foundation; National Clinical Medical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases (PLA General Hospital). [Clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly in China (2022 edition)]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2022; 61: 12−50. [In Chinese].

[9]

Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 1289−1367.

[10]

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1581−1598.

[11]

Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011; 123: 2736−2747.

[12]

Patsouras A, Farmaki P, Garmpi A, et al. Screening and risk assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: an updated review. In Vivo 2019; 33: 1039−1049.

[13]

De Candia G. Percutaneous coronary intervention risk scores. Minerva Cardioangiol 2018; 66: 569−575.

[14]

Pultar J, Wadowski PP, Panzer S, et al. Oral antiplatelet agents in cardiovascular disease. Vasa 2019; 48: 291−302.

[15]
Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation 2016; 134: e123–e155.
[16]

Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 213−260.

[17]

Atherosclerosis and Coronary Heart Disease Working Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology; Interventional Cardiology Working Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology; Specialty Committee on Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis of Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians; Specialty Committee on Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis of Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese Society of Cardiology and Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians Expert Consensus statement on dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2021; 49: 432−454. [In Chinese].

[18]

Bonaca MP, Murphy SA, Miller D, et al. Patterns of long-term thienopyridine therapy and outcomes in patients withacute coronary syndrome treated with coronary stenting: observations from the TIMI-38 Coronary Stent Registry. Clin Cardiol 2014; 37: 293−299.

[19]

Kang J, Park KW, Palmerini T, et al. Racial differences in ischaemia/bleeding risk trade-off during anti-platelet therapy: individual patient level landmark meta-analysis from seven RCTs. Thromb Haemost 2019; 119: 149−162.

[20]

Xu JJ, Gao Z, Zhang Y, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation in China: a large single center study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91: 566−572.

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 586-595
Cite this article:
XU J-J, JIA S-D, ZHU P, et al. Prolonging dual antiplatelet therapy improves the long-term prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2023, 20(8): 586-595. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2023.08.004

680

Views

52

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Published: 30 August 2023
© 2023 JGC All rights reserved
Return