AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Special Article | Open Access

Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of drug-coated balloon (2nd Edition)

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary interventions have progressed through the era of plain balloon dilation, bare-metal stent insertion to drug-eluting stent treatment, which has significantly reduced the acute occlusion and restenosis rates of target vessels and improved patient prognosis, making drug-eluting stents the mainstream interventional treatment for coronary artery disease. In recent years, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have become a new treatment strategy for coronary artery disease, and the drugs used in the coating and the coating technology have progressed in the past years. Without permanent implant, a DCB delivers antiproliferative drugs rapidly and uniformly into the vessel wall via the excipient during a single balloon dilation. Many evidence suggests that DCB angioplasty is an effective measure for dealing with in-stent restenosis and de novo lesions in small coronary vessels. As more clinical studies are published, new evidence is emerging for the use of DCB angioplasty in a wide range of coronary diseases, and the indications are expanding internationally. Based on the latest research from China and elsewhere, the Expert Writing Committee of the Chinese Expert Consensus on Clinical Applications of Drug-Coated Balloon has updated the previous DCB consensus after evidence-based discussions and meetings in terms of adequate preparation of in-stent restenosis lesions, expansion of the indications for coronary de novo lesions, and precise guidance of DCB treatment by intravascular imaging and functional evaluation.

References

[1]

Moussa ID, Mohananey D, Saucedo J, et al. Trends and outcomes of restenosis after coronary stent implantation in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 1521−1531.

[2]

Chen YD, Wang JA, Liu B, et al. [Chinese Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Drug-Coated Balloon]. Chin J Intervent Cardiol 2016; 24: 61−67. [In Chinese].

[3]

Yerasi C, Case BC, Forrestal BJ, et al. Drug-coated balloon for de novo coronary artery disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75: 1061−1073.

[4]

Sousa-Uva M, Neumann FJ, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55: 4−90.

[5]

Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Grüntzig lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 3320−3331.

[6]

Park SJ, Kang SJ, Virmani R, et al. In-stent neoatherosclerosis: a final common pathway of late stent failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 2051−2057.

[7]

Ali RM, Abdul Kader M, Wan Ahmad WA, et al. Treatment of coronary drug-eluting stent restenosis by a sirolimus- or paclitaxel-coated balloon. JACC Cardiovasc In terv 2019; 12: 558−566.

[8]

Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, et al. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75: 2664−2678.

[9]

Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a comprehensive, collaborative, individual patient data meta-analysis of 10 randomized clinical trials (DAEDALUS study). Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 3715−3728.

[10]

Pan L, Lu W, Han Z, et al. Clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon in coronary lesions: a real-world, all-comers study. Clin Res Cardiol 2022; 111: 732−741.

[11]

Section of Interventional Cardiology of Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Specialty Committee on Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis of Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention (2016)]. Zh onghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2016; 44: 382−400. [In Chinese].

[12]

Otsuka F, Byrne RA, Yahagi K, et al. Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic finding and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 2147−2159.

[13]

Tanaka A, Latib A, Jabbour RJ, et al. Impact of angiographic result after predilatation on outcome after drug-coated balloon treatment of in-stent coronary restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2016; 118: 1460−1465.

[14]

Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3281−3300.

[15]

Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, et al. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2113−2124.

[16]

Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, et al. Two year follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. Clin Res Cardiol 2008; 97: 773−781.

[17]

Scheller B, Clever YP, Kelsch B, et al. Long-term follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 323−330.

[18]

Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circula tion 2009; 119: 2986−2994.

[19]

Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: the 3-year results of the PEPCAD II ISR study. EuroIntervention 2015; 11: 926−934.

[20]

Rittger H, Brachmann J, Sinha AM, et al. A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1377−1382.

[21]

Rittger H, Waliszewski M, Brachmann J, et al. Long-term outcomes after treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon versus balloon angioplasty: insights from the PEPCAD-DES study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Catheter). JA CC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1695−1700.

[22]

Habara S, Mitsudo K, Kadota K, et al. Effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter in patients with sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 149−154.

[23]

Habara S, Iwabuchi M, Inoue N, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with bare-metal stent restenosis and drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am Heart J 2013; 166: 527−533.

[24]

Byrne RA, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 461−467.

[25]

Kufner S, Cassese S, Valeskini M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis: 3-year results of a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 877−884.

[26]

Adriaenssens T, Dens J, Ughi G, et al. Optical coherence tomography study of healing characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting balloons vs. everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) randomised clinical trial. EuroIntervention 2014; 10: 439−448.

[27]

Xu B, Gao R, Wang J, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 204−211.

[28]

Xu B, Qian J, Ge J, et al. Two-year results and subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD China in-stent restenosis trial: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis. Catheter Card iovasc Interv 2016; 87: 624−629.

[29]

Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, et al. A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V clinical trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1378−1386.

[30]

Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, et al. Long-term results of everolimus-eluting stents versus drug-eluting balloons in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: 3-year follow-up of the RIBS V clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: 1246−1255.

[31]

Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: the RIBS IV randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 23−33.

[32]

Pleva L, Kukla P, Kusnierova P, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters and everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: the treatment of in-stent restenosis study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: e003316.

[33]

Kufner S, Joner M, Schneider S, et al. Neointimal modification with scoring balloon and efficacy of drug-coated balloon therapy in patients with restenosis in drug-eluting coronary stents: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 1332−1340.

[34]

Wong YTA, Kang DY, Lee JB, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: a randomized RESTORE trial. Am Heart J 2018; 197: 35−42.

[35]

Jensen CJ, Richardt G, Tölg R, et al. Angiographic and clinical performance of a paclitaxel-coated balloon compared to a second-generation sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with in-stent restenosis: the BIOLUX randomised controlled trial. EuroIntervention 2018; 14: 1096−1103.

[36]

Baan J Jr, Claessen BE, Dijk KB, et al. A randomized comparison of paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of any in-stent restenosis: the DARE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 275−283.

[37]

Chen Y, Gao L, Qin Q, et al. Comparison of two different drug-coated balloons in in-stent restenosis: the RESTORE ISR China randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 2368−2377.

[38]

Zhu J, Liu L, Zhu Z, et al. A randomized comparison of a novel iopromide-based paclitaxel-coated balloon Shenqi versus SeQuent please for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Coron Artery Dis 2021; 32: 526−533.

[39]

Qian J, Wu Y, Li C, et al. Drug-coated balloon for the treatment of small vessel disease: 9 months of angiographic results and 12 months of clinical outcomes of the PEPCAD China SVD study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 101: 33−43.

[40]

Xu K, Fu G, Tong Q, et al. Biolimus-coated balloon in small-vessel coronary artery disease: the BIO-RISE China study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15: 1219−1226.

[41]

Biondi-Zoccai G, Moretti C, Abbate A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for small vessel coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2010; 11: 189−198.

[42]

Siontis GC, Piccolo R, Praz F, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions for the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries: a network meta-analysis. JACC Cardiov asc Interv 2016; 9: 1324−1334.

[43]

Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow MA, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): 3-year follow-up of a randomised, non-inferiority trial. La ncet 2020; 396: 1504−1510.

[44]

Megaly M, Buda K, Saad M, et al. Outcomes with drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents in small-vessel coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2022; 35: 76−82.

[45]

Cortese B, Di Palma G, Guimaraes MG, et al. Drug-coated balloon vs. drug-eluting stent for small coronary vessel disease: PICCOLETO II randomized clinical trial. JA CC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13: 2840−2849.

[46]

Tang Y, Qiao S, Su X, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for small-vessel disease: the RESTORE SVD China randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 2381−2392.

[47]

Naganuma T, Latib A, Sgueglia GA, et al. A 2-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels the BELLO study. Int J Card iol 2015; 184: 17−21.

[48]

Latib A, Ruparelia N, Menozzi A, et al. 3-year follow-up of the Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization study (BELLO). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1132−1134.

[49]

Venetsanos D, Lawesson SS, Panayi G, et al. Long-term efficacy of drug coated balloons compared with new generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 92: E317−E326.

[50]

Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, et al. Treatment of small coronary arteries with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in the PEPCAD I study: are lesions clinically stable from 12 to 36 months? EuroIntervention 2013; 9: 620−628.

[51]

Cortese B, Micheli A, Picchi A, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent during PCI of small coronary vessels, a prospective randomised clinical trial. The PICCOLETO study. Heart 2010; 96: 1291−1296.

[52]

Kleber FX, Rittger H, Ludwig J, et al. Drug eluting balloons as stand alone procedure for coronary bifurcational lesions: results of the randomized multicenter PEPCAD-BIF trial. Clin Res Cardiol 2016; 105: 613−621.

[53]

Jim MH, Lee MK, Fung RC, et al. Six month angiographic result of supplementary paclitaxel-eluting balloon deployment to treat side branch ostium narrowing (SARPEDON). Int J Cardiol 2015; 187: 594−597.

[54]

Her AY, Ann SH, Singh GB, et al. Serial morphological changes of side-branch ostium after paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment of de novo coronary lesions of main vessels. Yonsei Med J 2016; 57: 606−613.

[55]

Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: third report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiov asc Interv 2020; 13: 1391−1402.

[56]

Jing QM, Zhao X, Han YL, et al. A drug-eluting Balloon for the trEatment of coronarY bifurcatiON lesions in the side branch: a prospective multicenter ranDomized (BEYOND) clinical trial in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133: 899−908.

[57]

Shin ES, Ann SH, Balbir Singh G, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 88: 193−200.

[58]

Poerner TC, Duderstadt C, Goebel B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary angioplasty using paclitaxel-coated balloons without stent implantation: feasibility, safety and 6-month results by angiography and optical coherence tomography. Clin Res Cardiol 2017; 106: 18−27.

[59]

Yamamoto T, Ishii T, Ishida A. Impact of post physiological assessment after treatment for de novo coronary lesions using drug-coated balloons. Int J Cardiol 2022; 363: 11−19.

[60]

Yu X, Ji F, Xu F, et al. Treatment of large de novo coronary lesions with paclitaxel-coated balloon only: results from a Chinese institute. Clin Res Cardiol 2019; 108: 234−243.

[61]

Liu Y, Zhang YJ, Deng LX, et al. 12-month clinical results of drug-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesion in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 35: 579−586.

[62]

Qiu J, Han ZY, Wang X, et al. [Outcomes of patients treated with drug-coated balloons for de novo large coronary vessels]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2019; 47: 452−456. [In Chinese].

[63]

Rosenberg M, Waliszewski M, Krackhardt F, et al. Drug coated balloon-only strategy in de novo lesions of large coronary vessels. J Interv Cardiol 2019; 2019: 6548696.

[64]

Nishiyama N, Komatsu T, Kuroyanagi T, et al. Clinical value of drug-coated balloon angioplasty for de novo lesions in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2016; 222: 113−118.

[65]

Yu X, Wang X, Ji F, et al. A non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon versus new-generation drug-eluting stents on angiographic outcomes for coronary de novo lesions. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2022; 36: 655−664.

[66]

Toelg R, Merkely B, Erglis A, et al. Coronary artery treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon using a BTHC excipient: clinical results of the international real-world DELUX registry. Eurointervention 2014; 10: 591−599.

[67]

Lu W, Zhu Y, Han Z, et al. Short-term outcomes from drug-coated balloon for coronary de novo lesions in large vessels. J Cardiol 2019; 73: 151−155.

[68]

Widder JD, Cortese B, Levesque S, et al. Coronary artery treatment with urea-based paclitaxel-coated balloon: the European-wide FALCON all-comers DCB Registry (FALCON Registry). Eurointervention 2019; 15: e382−e388.

[69]

Uskela S, Kärkkäinen JM, Eränen J, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon-only strategy in stable coronary artery disease and in acute coronary syndromes: an all-comers registry study. Catheter Ca rdiovasc Interv 2019; 93: 893−900.

[70]

Rissanen TT, Uskela S, Eränen J, et al. Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019; 394: 230−239.

[71]

Köln PJ, Scheller B, Liew HB, et al. Treatment of chronic total occlusions in native coronary arteries by drug-coated balloons without stenting: a feasibility and safety study. Int J Cardiol 2016; 225: 262−267.

[72]

Wöhrle J, Werner GS. Paclitaxel-coated balloon with bare-metal stenting in patients with chronic total occlusions in native coronary arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 81: 793−799.

[73]

Hofma SH, van der Giessen WJ, van Dalen BM, et al. Indication of long-term endothelial dysfunction after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 166−170.

[74]

Lee CW, Park DW, Lee BK, et al. Predictors of restenosis after placement of drug-eluting stents in one or more coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 506−511.

[75]

Ito R, Ueno K, Yoshida T, et al. Outcomes after drug-coated balloon treatment for patients with calcified coronary lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2018; 31: 436−441.

[76]

Yang X, Lu W, Pan L, et al. Long-term outcomes of drug-coated balloons in patients with diffuse coronary lesions. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 935263.

[77]

Costopoulos C, Latib A, Naganuma T, et al. The role of drug-eluting balloons alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo diffuse coronary disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 1153−1159.

[78]

Scheller B. Editorial: rotational atherectomy followed by drug-coated balloons in calcified coronary de novo lesions: alternative to stent implantation? Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2020; 21: 654−656.

[79]

Ueno K, Morita N, Kojima Y, et al. Safety and long-term efficacy of drug-coated balloon angioplasty following rotational atherectomy for severely calcified coronary lesions compared with new generation drug-eluting stents. J Interv Cardiol 2019; 2019: 9094178.

[80]

Iwasaki Y, Koike J, Ko T, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting stents vs. drug-coated balloon after rotational atherectomy for severely calcified lesions of nonsmall vessels. Heart Vessels 2021; 36: 189−199.

[81]

Lu W, Pan L, Han Z, et al. Stentless at ostium: a novel approach for treating ostial left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery lesions with drug-coated balloons. Am J Transl Res 2022; 14: 6256−6267.

[82]

Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent noor slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 2088−2098.

[83]

Scheller B, Ohlow MA, Ewen S, et al. Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial. Eurointervention 2020; 15: 1527−1533.

[84]

Vos NS, Fagel ND, Amoroso G, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction: the REVELATION randomized trial. JA CC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12: 1691−1699.

[85]

Godoy LC, Rao V, Farkouh ME. Coronary revascularization of patients with diabetes mellitus in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2019; 140: 1233−1235.

[86]

Roffi M, Angiolillo DJ, Kappetein AP. Current concepts on coronary revascularization in diabetic patients. Eur Hea rt J 2011; 32: 2748−2757.

[87]

Berry C, Tardif JC, Bourassa MG. Coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes: part II: recent advances in coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 643−656.

[88]

Wöhrle J, Zadura M, Möbius-Winkler S, et al. SeQuentPlease World Wide Registry: clinical results of SeQuent please paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in a large-scale, prospective registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1733−1738.

[89]

Wöhrle J, Scheller B, Seeger J, et al. Impact of diabetes on outcome with drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents: the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14: 1789−1798.

[90]

Scheller B. Antithrombocytic therapy and PCI. Duration of therapy after DCB/stents/scaffolds. Herz 2014; 39: 819−821.

[91]

Corballis NH, Wickramarachchi U, Vassiliou VS, et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in elective drug-coated balloon angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 96: 1016−1020.

[92]

Rhee TM, Lee JM, Shin ES, et al. Impact of optimized procedure-related factors in drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 969−978.

[93]

Hui L, Shin ES, Jun EJ, et al. Impact of dissection after drug-coated balloon treatment of de novo coronary lesions: angiographic and clinical outcomes. Yonsei Med J 2020; 61: 1004−1012.

[94]

Chung JH, Lee KE, Her AY, et al. Comparison of fractional flow reserve and angiographic characteristics after balloon angioplasty in de novo coronary lesions. Int J Ca rdiovasc Imaging 2019; 35: 1945−1954.

[95]

Her AY, Shin ES, Bang LH, et al. Drug-coated balloon treatment in coronary artery disease: recommendations from an Asia-Pacific Consensus Group. Cardiol J 2021; 28: 136−149.

[96]

Cai X, Tian F, Jing J, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative flow ratio measured immediately after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 97: 1048−1054.

[97]

Li L, Guan C, Meng S, et al. Short- and long-term functional results following drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in small coronary vessels: the RESTORE quantitative flow ratio study. Int J Cardiol 2021; 327: 45−51.

[98]

Chung JH, Shin ES, Her AY, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 36: 179−185.

[99]

Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Kitrou P, et al. Risk of death following application of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in the femoropopliteal artery of the leg: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7: e011245.

[100]

Scheller B, Vukadinovic D, Jeger R, et al. Survival after coronary revascularization with paclitaxel-coated balloons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75: 1017−1028.

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 135-152
Cite this article:
GE J-B, CHEN Y-D. Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of drug-coated balloon (2nd Edition). Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2024, 21(2): 135-152. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2024.02.001

505

Views

66

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Published: 28 February 2024
© 2024 JGC All rights reserved
Return