PDF (2.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Figures (2)

Tables (2)
Table 1
Table 2
Research Article | Open Access

Dual antiplatelets therapy prescription trends and mortality outcomes among senior citizens with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database

Siti Zaleha Suki1,2,*()Ahmad Syadi Mahmood Zuhdi3,*Abqariyah Yahya4,*Nur Lisa Zaharan1,*()
Department of Pharmacology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Centre of Preclinical Science Studies (Pharmacology), Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

*The authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Show Author Information

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine 5-year trends and variations in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prescription among multiethnic Malaysian patients aged 60 years and older.

METHODS

Using the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease-Acute Coronary Syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry, DAPT 5-year temporal trends prescribing patterns at discharge were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of DAPT prescription. The 1-year all-cause mortality by Cox proportional hazard regression model (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR) using inverse proportional weighting covariates adjustment was performed to assess DAPT prognostic impacts.

RESULTS

Data of patients aged 60 years and older were extracted from 2013 to 2017 (n = 3718, mean age: 68 ± 6.74 years, men: 72%, and Malay ethnicity: 43%). The majority of patients were diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (63%), predisposed hypertension (76%) and were overweight (74%), while only 35% of patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Over the five years, there was a significant increasing trend in DAPT prescriptions (P < 0.001), with the aspirin-clopidogrel combination being the most common. Aspirin-ticagrelor prescriptions have also increased over the years. Variations in DAPT prescriptions were observed based on patient characteristics. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were more likely to be prescribed DAPT in general (aOR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.95–3.28, P < 0.001) and aspirin-ticagrelor specifically (aOR = 7.76, 95% CI: 5.65–10.68, P < 0.001). Patients with chronic lung disease (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42–0.92, P = 0.02) and a history of angina within two weeks (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56–0.85, P < 0.001) were approximately 30% less likely to be prescribed DAPT. Approximately 15% of 1-year all-cause mortality were reported. Older patients prescribed DAPT showed significantly higher survival rates than those who were not (aHR < 1.0, P < 0.001). Aspirin-ticagrelor was associated with higher survival rates than aspirin-clopidogrel (aHR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11–0.40, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the optimal prescription rate and variation of DAPT in the older Malaysian population, there is room for investigation and improvement in the prescription of newer DAPT combinations that have been suggested to improve patient survival.

References

[1]
Department of Statistics Malaysia: Current population estimates, Malaysia, 2018–2019, in Yearly, 2019. Department of Statistics Malaysia, Malaysia.
[2]
Malaysia Ministry of Health, National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019: Vol. I: NCDs–non-communicable diseases: risk factors and other health problems, 2020.
[3]
Department of Statistics Malaysia: Statistics on causes of death, Malaysia, 2018. Department of Statistics Malaysia, Malaysia.
[4]

Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2023; 44: 3720−3826.

[5]
Ahmad WAW. Report of the acute coronary syndrome registry, 2014–2015. National Cardiovascular Disease Database (NCVD), 2017.
[6]
National Heart Association of Malaysia: Summary of key findings from the annual reports of the National Cardiovascular Disease Database (NCVD) ACS registry 2006–2019, 2022. National Heart Association of Malaysia, Malaysia.
[7]

Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patient with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline. Circulation 2014; 130: e344−e426.

[8]

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 119−177.

[9]
Malaysia Ministry of Health: Primary & Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2017, Malaysia Ministry of Health, 2017. Malaysia Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
[10]
Ahmad WAW. Annual report of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry, 2015–2016. National Cardiovascular Disease Database (NCVD), 2018.
[11]

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e297.

[12]

Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med 2004; 23: 2937−2960.

[13]

Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41−55.

[14]
Schmillen ADW, Yap WA, Bandaogo MASS, et al. A silver lining: productive and inclusive aging for Malaysia (English). The Malaysia Development Experience Series Washington, 2020.
[15]

Brandes RP, Fleming I, Busse R. Endothelial aging. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 66: 286−294.

[16]

Capodanno D, Greco A. Risk stratification for bleeding in the elderly with acute coronary syndromes: not so simple. Thromb Haemost 2018; 118: 949−952.

[17]

Savonitto S, Morici N, Cavallini C, et al. One-year mortality in elderly adults with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: effect of diabetic status and admission hyperglycemia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62: 1297−1303.

[18]

Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 267−315.

[19]

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 119−177.

[20]

Danchin N, Lettino M, Zeymer U, et al. Use, patient selection and outcome of P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in patients with STEMI based on contemporary European registries. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2016; 2: 152−167.

[21]

Zeymer U, Widimsky P, Danchin N, et al. P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the real world: use, patient selection, and outcomes from contemporary European registries. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2016; 2: 229−243.

[22]

Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patient with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001−2015.

[23]

De Servi S, Crimi G, Calabrò P, et al. Relationship between diabetes, platelet reactivity, and the SYNTAX score to one-year clinical outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 2016; 12: 312−318.

[24]

Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Simoons M, et al. Age, clinical presentation, and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in the Euroheart acute coronary syndrome survey. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 789−795.

[25]

Ferreiro JL, Angiolillo DJ. Diabetes and antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2011; 123: 798−813.

[26]

Gargiulo G, Windecker S, da Costa BR, et al. Short term versus long term dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug eluting stent in patient with or without diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. BMJ 2016; 355: i5483.

[27]

Savonitto S, Ferri LA, Piatti L, et al. Comparison of reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel in elderly patient with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous revascularization. Circulation 2018; 137: 2435−2445.

[28]

Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patient with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1791−1800.

[29]

Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045−1057.

[30]

Husted S, James S, Becker RC, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5: 680−688.

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 237-245
Cite this article:
Suki SZ, Zuhdi ASM, Yahya A, et al. Dual antiplatelets therapy prescription trends and mortality outcomes among senior citizens with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2025, 22(2): 237-245. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.02.004
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return