AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Model for Epidemic Prevention Policies

Zhoujingming Gao1Zhiyi Tan1Bing-Kun Bao2( )
School of Communications and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210000, China
School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In recent years, governments of more than 200 countries and regions have enacted measures to control the spread of COVID-19. A precise and comprehensive evaluation of policy effect provides important grounds for policy-making. Since the whole world has entered the post-epidemic era, prevention policies are inclined to strike a trade-off between controlling confirmed/death cases and the economic rebound. Furthermore, with the increasing vaccination rate, vaccination has become a considerable factor in determining policy stringency. However, the existing approaches are still limited in efficiency due to the following reasons: (1) They are still confined to policies’ containment effect on COVID-19, neglecting the impact of vaccination on policy effect and the impact of policies on economy; (2) While evaluating policy effect in different regions, most existing models lack robustness. To address these problems, we propose a multi-dimensional evaluation model for more effective assessment of epidemic prevention policies in post-epidemic era. The proposed model consists of two modules: (1) A multi-dimensional objective-programming module is raised to evaluate the policy effect comprehensively, where vaccination, policy stringency, economy indicators, confirmed cases, and reproductive rate are taken into account; (2) A vaccine-dependent parameter learning (VDPL) module based on Bayesian deep learning (BDL) models a vaccine-dependent parameter which indicates the relationship between vaccination and policy stringency. The module also strengthens the robustness of the proposed model with the help of BDL since BDL can adapt the data of different regions better through resampling the probability distribution of network weights. Finally, We evaluate our model on the data of the US. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach performs better in depicting the spread of COVID-19 under the influence of policy.

References

[1]
World Health Organization, Who director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19, https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-2021, 2024.
[2]
R. K. Borchering, C. Viboud, E. Howerton, C. P. Smith, S. Truelove, M. C. Runge, N. G. Reich, L. Contamin, J. Levander, J. Salerno, et al., Modeling of future COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, by vaccination rates and nonpharmaceutical intervention scenarios—United States, April–September 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly., vol. 70, no. 19, pp. 719–724, 2021.
[3]

L. Bonacini, G. Gallo, and F. Patriarca, Identifying policy challenges of COVID-19 in hardly reliable data and judging the success of lockdown measures, J. Popul. Econ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 275–301, 2021.

[4]

L. Silva, D. Figueiredo Filho, and A. Fernandes, The effect of lockdown on the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil: Evidence from an interrupted time series design, Cad. Saude Publica, vol. 36, no. 10, p. e00213920, 2020.

[5]
F. E. Alvarez, D. Argente, and F. Lippi, A simple planning problem for COVID-19 lockdown, http://www.nber.org/papers/w26981.pdf, 2020.
[6]
A. H. Min, Dining-in to resume for fully vaccinated people in groups of 5 from Aug 10, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/dining-vaccinated-people-covid-19-aug-10-hawkers-2096546, 2021.
[7]
T. Hale, N. Angrist, B. Kira, A. Petherick, T. Phillips, and S. Webster, Variation in government responses to COVID-19, https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/variation-government-responses-covid-19, 2020.
[8]

R. M. Colombo, M. Garavello, F. Marcellini, and E. Rossi, An age and space structured SIR model describing the COVID-19 pandemic, J. Math. Ind., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 22, 2020.

[9]

G. L. Watson, D. Xiong, L. Zhang, J. A. Zoller, J. Shamshoian, P. Sundin, T. Bufford, A. W. Rimoin, M. A. Suchard, and C. M. Ramirez, Pandemic velocity: Forecasting COVID-19 in the US with a machine learning & Bayesian time series compartmental model, PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 17, no. 3, p. e1008837, 2021.

[10]
N. A. Haber, E. Clarke-Deelder, J. A. Salomon, A. Feller, and E. A. Stuart, COVID-19 policy impact evaluation: A guide to common design issues, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2009.01940, 2020.
[11]

Z. Vokó and J. G. Pitter, The effect of social distance measures on COVID-19 epidemics in Europe: An interrupted time series analysis, GeroScience, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1075–1082, 2020.

[12]

C. R. Berry, A. Fowler, T. Glazer, S. Handel-Meyer, and A. MacMillen, Evaluating the effects of shelter-in-place policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 118, no. 15, p. e2019706118, 2021.

[13]
M. Aledhari, R. Razzak, R. M. Parizi, and A. Dehghantanha, A deep recurrent neural network to support guidelines and decision making of social distancing, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data (Big Data), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020, pp. 4233–4240.
[14]
S. Ghamizi, R. Rwemalika, M. Cordy, L. Veiber, T. F. Bissyandé, M. Papadakis, J. Klein, and Y. Le Traon, Data-driven simulation and optimization for COVID-19 exit strategies, in Proc. 26th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Virtual, 2020, pp. 3434–3442.
[15]

P. Arora, H. Kumar, and B. K. Panigrahi, Prediction and analysis of COVID-19 positive cases using deep learning models: A descriptive case study of India, Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, p. 110017, 2020.

[16]

J. Luo, Z. Zhang, Y. Fu, and F. Rao, Time series prediction of COVID-19 transmission in America using LSTM and XGBoost algorithms, Results Phys., vol. 27, p. 104462, 2021.

[17]

M. H. Tayarani-Najaran, A novel ensemble machine learning and an evolutionary algorithm in modeling the COVID-19 epidemic and optimizing government policies, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 6362–6372, 2022.

[18]

J. Sun, Y. Zheng, W. Liang, Z. Yang, Z. Zeng, T. Li, J. Luo, M. T. Alexander Ng, J. He, and N. Zhong, Quantifying the effect of public activity intervention policies on COVID-19 pandemic containment using epidemiologic data from 145 countries, Value Health, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 699–708, 2022.

[19]

S. Grundel, S. Heyder, T. Hotz, T. K. S. Ritschel, P. Sauerteig, and K. Worthmann, How much testing and social distancing is required to control COVID-19? Some insight based on an age-differentiated compartmental model, SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. S145–S169, 2022.

[20]

A. E. Tenório, R. Martins, L. Martins, S. Brito, and R. Chaves, Data-driven study of the COVID-19 pandemic via age-structured modelling and prediction of the health system failure in Brazil amid diverse intervention strategies, PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7, p. e0236310, 2020.

[21]
J. Chen, S. Hoops, A. Marathe, H. Mortveit, B. Lewis, S. Venkatramanan, A. Haddadan, P. Bhattacharya, A. Adiga, A. Vullikanti, et al., Effective social network-based allocation of COVID-19 vaccines, in Proc. 28th ACM SIGKDD Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA, 2022, pp. 4675–4683.
[22]
Y. Li, C. Chan, Y. Li, and E. E. Kuruoglu, How does policy stringency affect the spread of COVID-19 pandemic? A country level study, in Proc. 29th European Signal Processing Conf. (EUSIPCO), Dublin, Ireland, 2021, pp. 1965–1969.
[23]

H. Wang and D. Y. Yeung, A survey on Bayesian deep learning, ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 53, no. 5, p. 108, 2020.

[24]
S. Fang, A. Narayan, R. Kirby, and S. Zhe, Bayesian continuous-time tucker decomposition, in Proc. 39th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (PMLR 2022), Baltimore, MD, USA, 2022, pp. 6235–6245.
[25]

S. Cabras, A Bayesian-deep learning model for estimating COVID-19 evolution in Spain, Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 22, p. 2921, 2021.

[26]
S. E. Oliver, J. W. Gargano, H. Scobie, M. Wallace, S. C. Hadler, J. Leung, A. E. Blain, N. McClung, D. Campos-Outcalt, R. L. Morgan, et al., The advisory committee on immunization practices’ interim recommendation for use of Janssen COVID-19 vaccine—United States, February 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 329–332, 2021.
[30]
Texas Government, COVID-19 vaccination recommendations, https://www.dshs.texas.gov/covid-19-coronavirus-disease-2019/covid-19-vaccine-information, 2021.
CAAI Artificial Intelligence Research
Article number: 9150034
Cite this article:
Gao Z, Tan Z, Bao B-K. A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Model for Epidemic Prevention Policies. CAAI Artificial Intelligence Research, 2024, 3: 9150034. https://doi.org/10.26599/AIR.2024.9150034
Part of a topical collection:

722

Views

81

Downloads

0

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 09 August 2023
Revised: 09 January 2024
Accepted: 11 April 2024
Published: 12 June 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return