AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

An Evaluation of Variational Autoencoder in Credit Card Anomaly Detection

School of Business, University of Maryland Global Campus, Adelphi, MD 20783, USA
School of Technology and Innovation, College of Business, Innovation, Leadership and Technology, Marymount University, Arlington, VA 22207, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Anomaly detection is one of the many challenging areas in cybersecurity. The anomaly can occur in many forms, such as fraudulent credit card transactions, network intrusions, and anomalous imageries or documents. One of the most common challenges in anomaly detection is the obscurity of the normal state and the lack of anomalous samples. Traditionally, this problem is tackled by using resampling techniques or choosing models that approximate the distribution of the normal states. Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) has been studied in anomaly detections despite being more suitable in generative tasks. This study aims to explore the usage of VAE in credit card anomaly detection and evaluate latent space sampling techniques. In this study, we evaluate the usage of the convolutional network-based VAE model on a credit card transaction dataset. We train two VAE models, one with a large number of normal data and one with a small number of anomalous data. We compare the performance of both VAE models and evaluate the latent space of both VAE models by rescaling them with reconstruction error vectors. We also compare the effectiveness of the VAE model with other anomaly detection models when they are trained on imbalanced dataset.

References

[1]

S. Zavrak and M. İskefiyeli, Anomaly-based intrusion detection from network flow features using variational autoencoder, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 108346–108358, 2020.

[2]
B. Lebichot, F. Braun, O. Caelen, and M. Saerens, A graph-based, semi-supervised, credit card fraud detection system, in Proc. of the 5th International Workshop Complex Networks & Their Applications, Milan, Italy, 2016, pp. 721–733,
[3]
Y. Guo, W. Liao, Q. Wang, L. Yu, T. Ji, and P. Li, Multidimensional time series anomaly detection: A gru-based gaussian mixture variational autoencoder approach, in Proceedings of the 10 th Asian Confernce on Machine Learning Research, Beijing, China, 2018, pp. 97−112.
[4]

J. Liu, H. Zhu, Y. Liu, H. Wu, Y. Lan, and X. Zhang, Anomaly detection for time series using temporal convolutional networks and gaussian mixture model, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1187, no. 4, pp. 042111–042121, 2019.

[5]

G. S. Chadha, I. Islam, A. Schwung, and S. X. Ding, Deep convolutional clustering-based time series anomaly detection, Sensors, vol. 21, no. 16, p. 5488, 2021.

[6]

M. Soleh, E. R. Djuwitaningrum, M. Ramli, and M. Indriasari, Feature engineering strategies based on a One-point Crossover for fraud detection on Big Data Analytics, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1566, no. 1, p. 012049, 2020.

[7]

D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, An introduction to variational autoencoders, Found. Trends® Mach. Learn., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 307–392, 2019.

[8]

Z. Islam, M. Abdel-Aty, Q. Cai, and J. Yuan, Crash data augmentation using variational autoencoder, Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 151, p. 105950, 2021.

[9]
J. An and S. Cho, Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability, http://dm.snu.ac.kr/static/docs/TR/SNUDM-TR-2015-03.pdf, 2023.
[10]
Z. Niu, K. Yu, and X. Wu, LSTM-based VAE-GAN for time-series anomaly detection, Sensors, vol. 20, no. 13, p. 3738, 2020.
[11]

Y. He and J. Zhao, Temporal convolutional networks for anomaly detection in time series, Journal of Physics, Conference Series, vol. 1213, no. 4, pp. 042050–042056, 2019.

[12]
M. Lorgat, A. Baghai-Wadji, and A. McDonald, Towards a general framework for network traffic time series anomaly detection, in Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Dublin, Ireland, 2017, pp. 252−260.
[13]

L. Zhang, W. Yang, H. Gan, M. Li, X. Wang, and G. Liang, Anomaly detection based on PMF encoding and adversarially learned inference, Journal of Physics, Conference Series, vol. 1187, no. 5, pp. 052037–052047, 2019.

[14]

H. Ahn, D. Jung, and H.-L. Choi, Deep generative models-based anomaly detection for spacecraft control systems, Sensors, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 1991, 2020.

[15]

L. Pangione, G. Burroughes, and R. Skilton, Variational AutoEncoder to identify anomalous data in robots, Robotics, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 93, 2021.

[17]
A. Wiratma, MIE213311-Tugas 1-Logistic & Random Tree-CC Fraud, https://www.kaggle.com/code/arkalilangwiratma/mie213311-tugas-1-logistic-random-tree-cc-fraud, 2023.
[18]

F. Alshameri and R. Xia, Credit card fraud detection: An evaluation of SMOTE resampling and machine learning model performance, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023.

Big Data Mining and Analytics
Pages 718-729
Cite this article:
Alshameri F, Xia R. An Evaluation of Variational Autoencoder in Credit Card Anomaly Detection. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2024, 7(3): 718-729. https://doi.org/10.26599/BDMA.2023.9020035

63

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 16 July 2023
Revised: 15 November 2023
Accepted: 22 November 2023
Published: 18 July 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return