AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Brain Science Advances Article
PDF (4.6 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Personality–brain connection: Based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data-driven exploration

Hong Li1,2,3,§( ), Junjie Wang4,5,§
Department of Mental Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment for Mental Disorder, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi, China
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital/First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi, China
School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China

§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background:

The personality-brain association mechanism has been a topic of interest in the field of neuroscience. Usually, the previous research strategy was to first group the population based on different personality traits, and then explore the brain mechanisms corresponding to different personality groups. At present, a "brain-first" research strategy, which uses data-driven approaches instead of personality traits to first group the population, has been adopted to further enhance study objectivity.

Methods:

Here, we used a data-driven approach following the "brain-first" research strategy to deeply mine the resting-state brain functional magnetic resonance imaging data of 119 healthy participants, classified subjects into different groups based on brain image characteristics, and used the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire to explain the variabilities of resting-state brain characteristics between different groups.

Results:

We have identified 3 personality–brain connections, including the privateness–left frontoparietal network, liveliness–sensory–motor network, and vigilance–sensory–motor network.

Conclusion:

We conclude that the above-mentioned three personality factors are based on brain neural activity, independent of the subjective experience of the personality scale creator, and have stronger explanatory power of brain imaging features.

Keywords

data-drivenresting-state fMRIpersonality traitsleft frontoparietal networksensory–motor network

References

[1]
Wang JJ, Hu Y, Li H, et al. Connecting openness and the resting-state brain network: a discover-validate approach. Front Neurosci 2018, 12: 762.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Canli T, Amin Z. Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: scientific evidence and ethical considerations. Brain Cogn 2002, 50(3): 414–431.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
DeYoung CG, Gray JR. Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behaviour and cognition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. Corr PJ, Matthews G., Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp 323–346.
Crossref
[4]
Diethelm O, Simons DJ. Electroencephalographic findings in psychopathic personalities. J Nerv Ment Dis 1945, 102: 611–614.
Google Scholar
[5]
Schmidtke JI, Heller W. Personality, affect and EEG: predicting patterns of regional brain activity related to extraversion and neuroticism. Pers Individ Differ 2004, 36(3): 717–732.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Stough C, Donaldson C, Scarlata B, et al. Psychophysiological correlates of the NEO PI-R openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness: preliminary results. Int J Psychophysiol 2001, 41(1): 87–91.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Johnson DL, Wiebe JS, Gold SM, et al. Cerebral blood flow and personality: a positron emission tomography study. Am J Psychiatry 1999, 156(2): 252–257.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
O'Gorman RL, Kumari V, Williams SCR, et al. Personality factors correlate with regional cerebral perfusion. NeuroImage 2006, 31(2): 489–495.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Ryan JP, Sheu LK, Gianaros PJ. Resting state functional connectivity within the cingulate cortex jointly predicts agreeableness and stressor-evoked cardiovascular reactivity. NeuroImage 2011, 55(1): 363–370.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Wang T, Chen ZC, Zhao G, et al. Linking inter-individual differences in the conflict adaptation effect to spontaneous brain activity. NeuroImage 2014, 90: 146–152.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Wei LQ, Duan XJ, Zheng CY, et al. Specific frequency bands of amplitude low-frequency oscillation encodes personality. Hum Brain Mapp 2014, 35(1): 331–339.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Cohn MD, Pape LE, Schmaal L, et al. Differential relations between juvenile psychopathic traits and resting state network connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 2015, 36(6): 2396–2405.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Kunisato Y, Okamoto Y, Okada G, et al. Personality traits and the amplitude of spontaneous low-frequency oscillations during resting state. Neurosci Lett 2011, 492(2): 109–113.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Wei LQ, Duan XJ, Yang Y, et al. The synchronization of spontaneous BOLD activity predicts extraversion and neuroticism. Brain Res 2011, 1419: 68–75.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Liu WY, Weber B, Reuter M, et al. The Big Five of Personality and structural imaging revisited: a VBM -DARTEL study. Neuroreport 2013, 24(7): 375–380.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Yang Z, LaConte S, Weng XC, et al. Ranking and averaging independent component analysis by reproducibility (RAICAR). Hum Brain Mapp 2008, 29(6): 711–725.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Yang Z, Zuo XN, Wang PP, et al. Generalized RAICAR: discover homogeneous subject (sub) groups by reproducibility of their intrinsic connectivity networks. NeuroImage 2012, 63(1): 403–414.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Yang Z, Chang CT, Xu T, et al. Connectivity trajectory across lifespan differentiates the precuneus from the default network. NeuroImage 2014, 89: 45–56.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Tian F, Wang JJ, Xu C, et al. Focusing on the differences of resting-state brain networks, using a data-driven approach to explore the functional neuroimaging characteristics of extraversion trait. Front Neurosci 2018, 12: 109.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1): 97–113.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Shephard DA. The 1975 declaration of Helsinki and consent. Can Med Assoc J 1976, 115(12): 1191–1192.
Google Scholar
[22]
The description and measurement of personality. Ment Health: Lond 1947, 7(2): 51–52.
Google Scholar
[23]
Sells SB, Cattell RB. Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Am J Psychol 1958, 71(3): 620.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Zuo XN, Xu T, Jiang LL, et al. Toward reliable characterization of functional homogeneity in the human brain: preprocessing, scan duration, imaging resolution and computational space. NeuroImage 2013, 65: 374–386.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Cox RW. AFNI: what a long strange trip it’s been. NeuroImage 2012, 62(2): 743–747.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, et al. Fsl. NeuroImage 2012, 62(2): 782–790.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Fischl B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 2012, 62(2): 774–781.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Zuo XN, Xing XX. Effects of non-local diffusion on structural MRI preprocessing and default network mapping: statistical comparisons with isotropic/anisotropic diffusion. PLoS One 2011, 6(10): e26703.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Avants B, Gee JC. Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation. NeuroImage 2004, 23(Suppl 1): S139–S150.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Yang Z, Xu Y, Xu T, et al. Brain network informed subject community detection in early-onset schizophrenia. Sci Rep 2014, 4: 5549.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Damoiseaux JS, Beckmann CF, Sanz Arigita EJ, et al. Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18(8): 1856–1864.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, et al. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005, 360(1457): 1001–1013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SARB, Barkhof F, et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(37): 13848–13853.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Goel V, Dolan RJ. Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition 2003, 87(1): B11–B22.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Goel V, Buchel C, Frith C, et al. Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. NeuroImage 2000, 12(5): 504–514.
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Noveck IA, Goel V, Smith KW. The neural basis of conditional reasoning with arbitrary content. Cortex 2004, 40(4/5): 613–622.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Langdon D, Warrington EK. The role of the left hemisphere in verbal and spatial reasoning tasks. Cortex 2000, 36(5): 691–702.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995, 34(4): 537–541.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Sugiura M, Kawashima R, Nakagawa M, et al. Correlation between human personality and neural activity in cerebral cortex. NeuroImage 2000, 11(5 Pt 1): 541–546.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987, 44(6): 573–588.
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993, 50(12): 975–990.
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Goldin PR, Manber T, Hakimi S, et al. Neural bases of social anxiety disorder: emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009, 66(2): 170–180.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Liao W, Chen HF, Feng Y, et al. Selective aberrant functional connectivity of resting state networks in social anxiety disorder. NeuroImage 2010, 52(4): 1549–1558.
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Kilts CD, Kelsey JE, Knight B, et al. The neural correlates of social anxiety disorder and response to pharmacotherapy. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 31(10): 2243–2253.
Crossref Google Scholar
Brain Science Advances
Volume 9 Issue 4,
December 2023
Pages 283-296
DOI: 10.26599/BSA.2023.9050019
Cite this article:
Li H, Wang J. Personality–brain connection: Based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data-driven exploration. Brain Science Advances, 2023, 9(4): 283-296. https://doi.org/10.26599/BSA.2023.9050019

781

Views

73

Downloads

0

Crossref

Altmetrics
Received: 25 April 2023
Revised: 24 June 2023
Accepted: 26 June 2023
Published: 05 December 2023
© The authors 2023.

This article is published with open access at journals.sagepub.com/home/BSA

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Return