AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (477.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access | Online First

Comparative analysis of climate governance in China and Germany

Dongyu Zhang1( )Shiyi Zhang2Hongda Ding1Meicong Liang1Ying Cao1
National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, Beijing 100035, China
Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Climate change is one of the major challenges facing humankind today. Responding to climate change is a common cause of humanity, and its urgency indicates that the world must endeavor together to combat this serious challenge. As countries with significant influence in global climate governance, China and Germany share a common vision in actively tackling climate change. Exploring the experience and practice of climate governance in both countries is of great significance in promoting the implementation of nationally determined contribution, providing lessons for other countries, and improving global climate governance. Focusing on the key components of China’s and Germany’s climate governance systems, this study reviews their practice of multi-level climate governance in terms of policy frameworks, policy instruments, political steering, and local actions, and attaches importance to the role and potential of national and local governments in climate action planning and implementing. By contrasting the characteristics of China’s and Germany’s climate governance systems, their experience is drawn on to propose the insights and recommendations for improving climate governance at the national level, which includes: strengthening the mandatory and binding nature of climate goals, decomposing national carbon emission targets scientifically, establishing regular monitoring and reporting mechanisms, improving the construction of emission trading system, and emphasizing local governments’ innovativeness in climate actions.

References

[2]
Wang, L. (2022). Research on ASEAN Climate Governance from the Perspective of Multilevel Governance. Beijing Foreign Studies University.
[3]

Ishtiaque, A., Eakin, H., Vij, S., Chhetri, N., Rahman, F., Huq, S. (2021). Multilevel governance in climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: Structure, processes, and power dynamics. Regional Environmental Change, 21: 75.

[4]

Cho, B. K., Chung, J. B., Song, C. K. (2023). National climate change governance and lock-in: Insights from Korea’s conservative and liberal governments’ committees. Energy Strategy Reviews, 50: 101238.

[5]

Lockwood, M. (2021). A hard Act to follow? The evolution and performance of UK climate governance. Environmental Politics, 30: 26–48.

[6]

Liu, M., Lo, K. (2021). Pathways to international cooperation on climate governance in China: A comparative analysis. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6: 417–434.

[7]
Vita, A. D., Connick, H. D., Mclaren, J., Cochran, J. (2009). Climate for collaboration: analysis of US and EU lessons and opportunities in energy and climate policy. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.2172/983407.
[8]
Gemmer, M., Wilkes, A., Vaucel, L. M. (2011). Governing climate change adaptation in the EU and China: An analysis of formal institutions. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2: 1–11.
[9]
Zhang, H. (2011). A comparative study on climate change policies between China and India. China University of Political Science and Law.
[10]

Never, B. (2012). Who drives change? comparing the evolution of domestic climate governance in India and South Africa. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21: 362–387.

[11]
Yu, Z. (2014). Comparative research on climate policy of the United States and the European Union. Xiamen University.
[12]

Gong, X., Liu, Y., Sun, T. (2020). Evaluating climate change governance using the “polity–policy–politics” framework: A comparative study of China and the United States. Sustainability, 12: 6403.

[13]
Huang, C., Tan, X., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Niu, M., Zhang, Q. (2021). An international comparative research of the climate adaptation governance and its strategic implications. Science Research Management, 42(2): 20–29. (In Chinese)
[14]
Zhou, J., Bai, Y., Su, Y., Wang, C. (2023). Country comparison of governance models for addressing climate change. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 15(4): 10–17. (In Chinese)
[16]
Zhou, L., Zhang, X., He, J. (2013). Main problems and suggestions for local decomposition of China’s carbon intensity target. Science & Technology Review, 31(1): 11.
[23]
Government of Germany. (2010). Second progress report on the german strategy for adaptation to climate change (DAS).
[24]
UBA. (2020). National inventory report for the german greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2018.
[25]
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action.
[29]
Government of Germany. (2019). 2030 Climate Action Programme (Klimaschutzprogramm 2030).
[30]
Monstadt, J. Scheiner, S. (2016). The Länder in the German energy and climate policy: Distributional issues and federal decision-making. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 74(3): 179–197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0395-6.
[32]
Tian, D. (2021). Recent progress in the rule of law in response to climate change in europe and implications and suggestions for China. Report. National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, 18.
[33]
Xu, M. (2012). On the plan for economic and social development and the construction of planning law. The Jurist, 02: 43–55+177. (In Chinese)
[34]
Tian, D., Xu, H. (2019). German climate protection law legislative motivation, main features and implications for China’s legislation. Report. National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, 18.
Energy and Climate Management
Cite this article:
Zhang D, Zhang S, Ding H, et al. Comparative analysis of climate governance in China and Germany. Energy and Climate Management, 2024, https://doi.org/10.26599/ECM.2024.9400007

681

Views

133

Downloads

0

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 12 March 2024
Revised: 25 April 2024
Accepted: 22 May 2024
Published: 09 July 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return