AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Fermatean Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making with Applications

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul 34442, Turkey
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Fermatean hesitant fuzzy set idea obtained by combining Fermatean fuzzy sets and hesitant fuzzy sets can be used in practice to simplify the solution of complicated multi-criteria decision-making problems. Initially, the notion of a Fermatean hesitant fuzzy set has been given, and the operations related to this concept have been presented. The basic properties of aggregation operators based on Fermatean hesitant fuzzy sets have been studied. To choose the best alternative in practice, a novel multi-criteria decision-making method that is obtained with operators has been created. Finally, numerical examples were examined to indicate the effectiveness of the suggested techniques. The main advantages of this work include three points: (1) extending hesitant fuzzy sets to the Fermatean fuzzy case and proposing two types of aggregation operators for the Fermatean hesitant fuzzy information; (2) considering the interaction among decision-makers and among attributes in decision problems, and dealing with this interrelationship by fuzzy measure; (3) introducing the new decision method for the Fermatean hesitant fuzzy environment and enriching the mathematical tools to solve multiple attributes decision-making problems.

References

[1]

L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.

[2]

K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986.

[3]

R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 958–965, 2014.

[4]

F. Feng, H. Fujita, M. I. Ali, R. R. Yager, and X. Liu, Another view on generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and related multiattribute decision making methods, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 474–488, 2019.

[5]

H. Garg, Some series of intuitionistic fuzzy interactive averaging aggregation operators, SpringerPlus, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 999, 2016.

[6]

M. Kirişci, Comparison of medical decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy parametrized fuzzy soft set and riesz summability, New Math. Nat. Comput., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 351–359, 2019.

[7]

M. Kirişci, Ω-soft sets and medical decision-making application, Int. J. Comput. Math., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 690–704, 2021.

[8]

J. J. Peng, J. Q. Wang, X. H. Wu, H. Y. Zhang, and X. H. Chen, The fuzzy cross-entropy for intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making, Int. J. Syst. Sci., vol. 46, no. 13, pp. 2335–2350, 2015.

[9]

X. Peng and G. Selvachandran, Pythagorean fuzzy set: State of the art and future directions, Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1873–1927, 2019.

[10]
F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic set-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set, in Proc. 2006 IEEE Int. Conf. Granular Computing, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006, pp. 38–42.
[11]
R. R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, in Proc. 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), Edmonton, Canada, 2013, pp. 57–61.
[12]

R. R. Yager and A. M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 436–452, 2013.

[13]

T. Senapati and R. R. Yager, Fermatean fuzzy sets, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 663–674, 2020.

[14]

T. Senapati and R. R. Yager, Some new operations over fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making, Informatica, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 391–412, 2019.

[15]

T. Senapati and R. R. Yager, Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 85, pp. 112–121, 2019.

[16]
M. Kirişci, New entropy and distance measures for fermatean fuzzy soft sets with medical decision-making and pattern recognition applications, https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR516614, 2022.
[17]

M. Kirişci, New cosine similarity and distance measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets and TOPSIS approach, Knowl. Inf. Syst., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 855–868, 2023.

[18]

M. Kirişci, I. Demir, and N. Şimşek, Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection, Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 127, p. 102278, 2022.

[19]

R. R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1222–1230, 2017.

[20]

D. Liu, Y. Liu, and X. Chen, Fermatean fuzzy linguistic set and its application in multicriteria decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 878–894, 2019.

[21]

D. Liu, Y. Liu, and L. Wang, Distance measure for Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term sets based on linguistic scale function: An illustration of the TODIM and TOPSIS methods, Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2807–2834, 2019.

[22]

G. Shahzadi and M. Akram, Group decision-making for the selection of an antivirus mask under fermatean fuzzy soft information, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1401–1416, 2021.

[23]

G. Shahzadi, F. Zafar, and M. A. Alghamdi, Multiple-attribute decision-making using fermatean fuzzy hamacher interactive geometric operators, Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2021, pp. 1–20, 2021.

[24]

G. Shahzadi, G. Muhiuddin, M. Arif Butt, and A. Ashraf, Hamacher interactive hybrid weighted averaging operators under fermatean fuzzy numbers, J. Math., vol. 2021, pp. 1–17, 2021.

[25]
N. Şimşek and M. Kirişci, Incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations and group decision-making, Topol. Appl., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 20220125, 2023.
[26]

M. Akram, G. Ali, J. C. R. Alcantud, and A. Riaz, Group decision-making with Fermatean fuzzy soft expert knowledge, Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 5349–5389, 2022.

[27]

M. Akram, U. Amjad, J. C. R. Alcantud, and G. Santos-García, Complex fermatean fuzzy N-soft sets: a new hybrid model with applications, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., pp. 1–34, 2022.

[28]

M. Akram, G. Shahzadi, and A. Ali H Ahmadini, Decision-making framework for an effective sanitizer to reduce COVID-19 under fermatean fuzzy environment, J. Math., vol. 2020, pp. 1–19, 2020.

[29]

V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 8, pp. 529–539, 2010.

[30]

Z. Zhang, Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Inf. Sci., vol. 234, pp. 150–181, 2013.

[31]

G. Qian, H. Wang, and X. Feng, Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system, Knowl. Based Syst., vol. 37, pp. 357–365, 2013.

[32]

B. Zhu and Z. Xu, Some results for dual hesitant fuzzy sets, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1657–1668, 2014.

[33]

J. J. Peng, J. Q. Wang, J. Wang, and X. H. Chen, Multicriteria decision-making approach with hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Sci. World J., vol. 2014, pp. 1–22, 2014.

[34]

M. S. Ali Khan, S. Abdullah, A. Ali, N. Siddiqui, and F. Amin, Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making with incomplete weight information, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 3971–3985, 2017.

[35]

M. Xia and Z. Xu, Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 395–407, 2011.

[36]

B. Bedregal, R. Reiser, H. Bustince, C. Lopez-Molina, V, Torra, Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms, Inform, Sciences, vol. 255, pp. 82–89, 2014.

[37]

B. Farhadinia, A series of score functions for hesitant fuzzy sets, Inf. Sci., vol. 277, pp. 102–110, 2014.

[38]

Z. Xu, On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP1, Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 683–687, 2000.

[39]

S. H. Kim and B. S. Ahn, Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information, Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 498–507, 1999.

[40]
Y. M. Wang, Using the method of maximizing deviation to make decision for multi-indices, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 21–26, 1997.
Fuzzy Information and Engineering
Pages 100-127
Cite this article:
Kirişci M. Fermatean Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making with Applications. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 2023, 15(2): 100-127. https://doi.org/10.26599/FIE.2023.9270011

1407

Views

262

Downloads

3

Crossref

2

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 07 December 2022
Revised: 17 February 2023
Accepted: 12 March 2023
Published: 30 June 2023
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return