AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Some Properties of the Extended Threshold Generated Implications

College of Mathematics and Information Science, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang 330032, China
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Fuzzy implications play an important role in both approximating reasoning and fuzzy control, and there are many generation methods for fuzzy implications for various applications. The extended threshold generation method for fuzzy implications can induce some implications differ from the usual implications, such as f-, g-implications, R-implications, S-implications, and those derived from the ordinal sum method. In this paper, we focus on the investigations of the preservation of some important properties under minimal necessary conditions similar to the e-threshold generation method, such as the neutral property, the exchange law, the weak importation law, the contraction law, and the distributivity property over t-norms and t-conorms.

References

[1]
M. Baczyński and B. Jayaram, Fuzzy implications from uninorms, in Fuzzy Implications, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008, pp. 145–177.
[2]

M. Gonzalez-Hidalgo, S. Massanet, A. Mir, and D. Ruiz-Aguilera, On the choice of the pair conjunction–implication into the fuzzy morphological edge detector, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 872–884, 2015.

[3]

F. Durante, E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, and C. Sempi, Conjunctors and their residual implicators: Characterizations and construction methods, Mediterr. J. Math., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 343–356, 2007.

[4]

M. Carbonell and J. Torrens, Continuous R-implications generated from representable aggregation functions, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 161, no. 17, pp. 2276–2289, 2010.

[5]

I. Aguiló, J. Suñer, and J. Torrens, A characterization of residual implications derived from left-continuous uninorms, Inf. Sci., vol. 180, no. 20, pp. 3992–4005, 2010.

[6]

M. Baczyński and B. Jayaram, (U, N)-implications and their characterizations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 160, no. 14, pp. 2049–2062, 2009.

[7]

B. De Baets and J. Fodor, Residual operators of uninorms, Soft Comput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89–100, 1999.

[8]

M. Mas, M. Monserrat, and J. Torrens, Two types of implications derived from uninorms, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 158, no. 23, pp. 2612–2626, 2007.

[9]

R. R. Yager, On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning, Inf. Sci., vol. 167, nos. 1–4, pp. 193–216, 2004.

[10]

M. Baczyński and B. Jayaram, Yager’s classes of fuzzy implications: Some properties and intersections, Kybernetika, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 157–182, 2007.

[11]

J. Balasubramaniam, Yager’s new class of implications Jf and some classical tautologies, Inf. Sci., vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 930–946, 2007.

[12]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, Intersection of yager’s implications with QL and D-implications, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 467–479, 2012.

[13]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, On the characterization of Yager’s implications, Inf. Sci., vol. 201, pp. 1–18, 2012.

[14]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, On a new class of fuzzy implications: H-Implications and generalizations, Inf. Sci., vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 2111–2127, 2011.

[15]

H. W. Liu, On a new class of implications: (g, min)-implications and several classical tautologies, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. -Based Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2012.

[16]

H. W. Liu, A new class of fuzzy implications derived from generalized h -generators, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 224, pp. 63–92, 2013.

[17]

H. W. Liu, Fuzzy implications derived from generalized additive generators of representable uninorms, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 555–566, 2013.

[18]

A. Xie and H. Liu, A generalization of Yager’s f-generated implications, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2013.

[19]

F. X. Zhang and H. W. Liu, On a new class of implications: ( g, u)-implications and the distributive equations, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1049–1065, 2013.

[20]

D. Hliněná, M. Kalina, and P. Král’, A class of implications related to Yager’s f-implications, Inf. Sci., vol. 260, pp. 171–184, 2014.

[21]

H. Zhou, Characterizations and applications of fuzzy implications generated by a pair of generators of T-norms and the usual addition of real numbers, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1952–1966, 2022.

[22]

H. Zhou, Characterizations of fuzzy implications generated by continuous multiplicative generators of T-norms, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2988–3002, 2021.

[23]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, Threshold generation method of construction of a new implication from two given ones, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 205, pp. 50–75, 2012.

[24]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, On some properties of threshold generated implications, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 205, pp. 30–49, 2012.

[25]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, On the vertical threshold generation method of fuzzy implication and its properties, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 226, pp. 32–52, 2013.

[26]

Y. Cheng and B. Zhao, N-vertical generated implications and their distributivities over t-norms and t-conorms, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 136, pp. 132–149, 2021.

[27]

Y. Su, A. Xie, and H. W. Liu, On ordinal sum implications, Inf. Sci., vol. 293, pp. 251–262, 2015.

[28]
E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, and E. Pap, Triangular Norms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2000.
[29]

B. Zhao and Y. Cheng, Natural construction method of ordinal sum implication and its distributivity, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 151, pp. 360–388, 2022.

[30]
Z. H. Yi and F. Qin, Extended threshold generation of a new class of fuzzy implications, in Proc. 4 th Int. Conf. Quantitative Logic and Soft Computing (QLSC2016), Hangzhou, China, 2016. pp. 281–291.
[31]
C. Alsina, M. J. Frank, and B. Schweizer, Associative Functions : Triangular Norms and Copulas, Singapore: World Scientific, 2006.
[32]
J. Fodor and M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 1994.
[33]

S. Massanet and J. Torrens, The law of importation versus the exchange principle on fuzzy implications, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 47–69, 2011.

[34]

Y. Shi, D. Ruan, and E. E. Kerre, On the characterizations of fuzzy implications satisfying I ( x, y) = I ( x, I ( x, y)), Inf. Sci., vol. 177, no. 14, pp. 2954–2970, 2007.

[35]

A. Xie and F. Qin, Solutions to the functional equation I ( x, y) = I ( x, I ( x, y)) for a continuous D-operation, Inf. Sci., vol. 180, no. 12, pp. 2487–2497, 2010.

[36]
S. Massanet and J. Torrens, Some remarks on the solutions to the functional equation I (x, y) = I (x, I (x, y)) for D-operations, in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Dortmund, Germany, 2010, pp. 666–675.
[37]

W. E. Combs and J. E. Andrews, Combinatorial rule explosion eliminated by a fuzzy rule configuration, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1998.

[38]

M. Baczyński, On two distributivity equations for fuzzy implications and continuous, Archimedean t-norms and t-conorms, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 211, pp. 34–54, 2013.

[39]

M. Baczynski and B. Jayaram, On the distributivity of fuzzy implications over nilpotent or strict triangular conorms, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 590–603, 2009.

[40]

M. Baczyński and F. Qin, Some remarks on the distributive equation of fuzzy implication and the contrapositive symmetry for continuous, Archimedean t-norms, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 290–296, 2013.

[41]

J. Balasubramaniam and C. J. M. Rao, On the distributivity of implication operators over T and S norms, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 194–198, 2004.

[42]
F. Qin and M. Baczyński, A survey of the distributivity of implications over continuous T-norms and the simultaneous satisfaction of the contrapositive symmetry, in Advances in Fuzzy Implication Functions, M. Baczyński, G. Beliakov, H. B. Sola, and A. Pradera Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013. pp. 53–72.
[43]

F. Qin and M. Baczyński, Distributivity equations of implications based on continuous triangular conorms (II), Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 240, pp. 86–102, 2014.

[44]

F. Qin, M. Baczyński, and A. Xie, Distributive equations of implications based on continuous triangular norms (I), IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 153–167, 2012.

[45]
F. Qin and M. Lu, On distributive equations of implications and contrapositive symmetry equations of implications based on a continuous t-norm, in Proc. Int. Symp. Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making (IUKM 2011), Hangzhou, China, 2011, pp. 109–120.
[46]

F. Qin and L. Yang, Distributive equations of implications based on nilpotent triangular norms, Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 984–992, 2010.

[47]

A. Xie, H. Liu, F. Zhang, and C. Li, On the distributivity of fuzzy implications over continuous Archimedean t-conorms and continuous t-conorms given as ordinal sums, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 205, pp. 76–100, 2012.

Fuzzy Information and Engineering
Pages 175-193
Cite this article:
Yi Z-H, Yao L-J, Qin F. Some Properties of the Extended Threshold Generated Implications. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 2024, 16(3): 175-193. https://doi.org/10.26599/FIE.2024.9270040

23

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 20 December 2023
Revised: 26 May 2024
Accepted: 07 June 2024
Published: 30 September 2024
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return