AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access | Just Accepted

Tribocorrosion behavior at the taper–trunnion interface of artificial hip prostheses with different femoral head materials

Yali Zhang1Jian Pu2Wen Shi3Shu Yang4Xiaogang Zhang1Zhongmin Jin1,5( )

1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

2 School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China

3 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Bone Implant Interface Functionalization and Personality Research, Just Medical Devices (Tianjin)Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300190, China

4 GBA Center for Medical Device Evaluation and Inspection, NMPA, Shenzhen 518000, China

5 School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The tribocorrosion damage at the taper–trunnion interface of the artificial hip prostheses restricts their effectiveness and service life. Existing investigations on the tribocorrosion mechanism primarily relied on simplified ball-on-disk models. They neglected the inherent complexity and uniqueness of the loading and motion condition at the real taper–trunnion interface. This study aimed to use a hip joint simulator to conduct a comparative investigation of the tribocorrosion behavior of Ti6Al4V  femoral stems paired with traditional ball head materials of CoCrMo alloy and zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) ceramic as well as with the innovative material zirconium–niobium (ZrNb) cermet, in an attempt to simulate the real physiological conditions. The results indicated that material loss in all three pairings was primarily dominated by wear. The CoCrMo–Ti6Al4V pairing demonstrated the largest material loss, whereas the ZTA–Ti6Al4V and ZrNb–Ti6Al4V pairings demonstrated comparable, but much smaller, material loss. This could be explained by the difference in variations in the wear and corrosion behavior among different material pairings. Further, the CoCrMo–Ti6Al4V pairing led to galvanic corrosion, thereby increasing the corrosion susceptibility. ZTA ceramic and ZrNb cermet with electrical insulation properties maintained a lower corrosion susceptibility. The ZTA–Ti6Al4V and ZrNb–Ti6Al4V pairings demonstrated a similar material loss in terms of mechanical wear, which was slightly lower than that with the CoCrMo–Ti6Al4V pairing. The relatively low hardness of CoCrMo alloy made it susceptible to the plowing effect induced by oxides during tribocorrosion, leading to substantial material loss and damage. Conversely, ZTA ceramic and ZrNb cermet ball heads showed significantly limited damage due to their higher hardness. Thus, the CoCrMo–Ti6Al4V pairing demonstrated a much higher wear-induced material loss. In conclusion, the tribocorrosion performance of ZTA–Ti6Al4V and ZrNb–Ti6Al4V pairings was comparable and significantly superior to that of CoCrMo–Ti6Al4V pairing.

Friction
Cite this article:
Zhang Y, Pu J, Shi W, et al. Tribocorrosion behavior at the taper–trunnion interface of artificial hip prostheses with different femoral head materials. Friction, 2024, https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2025.9440985

94

Views

10

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 02 May 2024
Revised: 21 July 2024
Accepted: 18 August 2024
Available online: 19 August 2024

© The author(s) 2025

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return