AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (720.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Energy-Efficient Sensory Data Collection Based on Spatiotemporal Correlation in IoT Networks

Jine Tang1Shuang Wu2Lingxiao Wei1Weijing Liu3( )Taishan Qin1Zhangbing Zhou2Junhua Gu1
School of Artificial Intelligence, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Tianjin Institute of Aerospace Mechanical and Electrical Equipment and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aerospace Intelligent Equipment Technology, Tianjin 300301, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is currently in a stage of rapid development. Hundreds of millions of sensing nodes and intelligent terminals undertake the tasks of sensing and transmitting data. Data collection is the key to realizing data analysis and intelligent application of IoT. The life cycle of IoT is limited by the energy of the IoT nodes in the network. A complex computing model will bring serious or even unbearable burdens to IoT nodes. In this study, we use the data prediction method to explore time correlation data and adjust the appropriate spatial sampling rate on the basis of the spatial correlation of sensory data to further reduce data. Specifically, the improved and optimized DNA-binding protein (DBP) data prediction method can increase the time interval of sensing data to further reduce energy consumption. Based on the spatial characteristics of the sensing data, substituting the data of similar nodes can reduce the sampling rate. The probabilistic wake-up strategy is also adopted to adjust the spatial correlation of the sensing data. On the basis of node priority, an optimized greedy algorithm is proposed to select the appropriate dominating node for eliminating redundant nodes and improving network energy utilization. Experiments have proven that our scheme reduces network energy consumption under the premise of ensuring data reliability.

References

1

T. D. T. Nguyen, V. Nguyen, V. N. Pham, L. N. T. Huynh, M. D. Hossain, and E. N. Huh, Modeling data redundancy and cost-aware task allocation in MEC-enabled internet-of-vehicles applications, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1687–1701, 2021.

2

H. Vasudev, V. Deshpande, D. Das, and S. K. Das, A lightweight mutual authentication protocol for V2V communication in internet of vehicles, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 6709–6717, 2020.

3

F. Cirillo, D. Gómez, L. Diez, I. Elicegui Maestro, T. B. J. Gilbert, and R. Akhavan, Smart city IoT services creation through large-scale collaboration, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 5267–5275, 2020.

4
A. Sivanathan, D. Sherratt, H. H. Gharakheili, V. Sivaraman, and A. Vishwanath, Low-cost flow-based security solutions for smart-home IoT devices, in Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems, Bangalore, India, 2016, pp. 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947781
5

M. B. Attia, K. K. Nguyen, and M. Cheriet, Dynamic QoS-aware scheduling for concurrent traffic in smart home, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 5412–5425, 2020.

6

C. Alippi, G. Anastasi, M. Di Francesco, and M. Roveri, An adaptive sampling algorithm for effective energy management in wireless sensor networks with energy-hungry sensors, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 335–344, 2010.

7

H. Ko and S. Pack, Neighbor-aware energy-efficient monitoring system for energy harvesting internet of things, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5745–5752, 2019.

8

L. Wang, D. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Chen, X. Han, and A. M’hamed, Sparse mobile crowdsensing: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 161–167, 2016.

9

S. Yoon and C. Shahabi, The clustered AGgregation (CAG) technique leveraging spatial and temporal correlations in wireless sensor networks, ACM Trans. Sens. Netw., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3, 2007.

10

L. A. Villas, A. Boukerche, H. A. B. F. de Oliveira, R. B. de Araujo, and A. A. F. Loureiro, A spatial correlation aware algorithm to perform efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks, Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 12, pp. 69–85, 2014.

11

M. M. Afsar and M. H. Tayarani-N, Clustering in sensor networks: A literature survey, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 46, pp. 198–226, 2014.

12

N. Choudhury, R. Matam, M. Mukherjee, J. Lloret, and E. Kalaimannan, NCHR: A nonthreshold-based cluster-head rotation scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 cluster-tree networks, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 168–178, 2021.

13

G. Anastasi, M. Conti, and M. Di Francesco, Extending the lifetime of wireless sensor networks through adaptive sleep, IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 351–365, 2009.

14

Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, Throughput maximization for UAV-enabled mobile relaying systems, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 4983–4996, 2016.

15

W. Wang and M. Zhang, Tensor deep learning model for heterogeneous data fusion in internet of things, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2020.

16

H. Cheng, Z. Xie, Y. Shi, and N. Xiong, Multi-step data prediction in wireless sensor networks based on one-dimensional CNN and bidirectional LSTM, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 117883–117896, 2019.

17

C. Hu, Y. Pu, F. Yang, R. Zhao, A. Alrawais, and T. Xiang, Secure and efficient data collection and storage of IoT in smart ocean, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 9980–9994, 2020.

18
D. Mechta and S. Harous, HC-LEACH: Huffman coding-based energy-efficient LEACH protocol for WSN, in Proc. 11th IEEE Ann. Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conf., New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 932–938.https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298061
19

H. M. Al-Kadhim and H. S. Al-Raweshidy, Energy efficient data compression in cloud based IoT, IEEE Sensors J., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 12212–12219, 2021.

20
A. K. M. Al-Qurabat, C. Abou Jaoude, and A. K. Idrees, Two tier data reduction technique for reducing data transmission in IoT sensors, in Proc. 15th Int. Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conf., Tangier, Morocco, 2019, pp. 168–173.https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2019.8766590
21

W. Chen, F. Cui, and K. K. L. Wong, Data collection mechanism based on wavelet multi-resolution for opportunistic social networks, IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 21357–21366, 2021.

22

A. Burrello, A. Marchioni, D. Brunelli, S. Benatti, M. Mangia, and L. Benini, Embedded streaming principal components analysis for network load reduction in structural health monitoring, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 4433–4447, 2021.

23

H. Zhang, X. Zhang, and D. K. Sung, Lightweight self-adapting linear prediction algorithms for wireless sensor networks, IEEE Sens. J., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 3050–3058, 2015.

24
D. Tulone and S. Madden, PAQ: Time series forecasting for approximate query answering in sensor networks, in Proc. 3rd European Workshop Wireless Sensor Networks, Zurich, Switzerland, 2006, pp. 21–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/11669463_5
25

Z. Han, J. Zhao, H. Leung, K. Ma, and W. Wang, A review of deep learning models for time series prediction, IEEE Sens. J., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 7833–7848, 2021.

26

C. Xu, K. Wang, Y. Sun, S. Guo, and A. Y. Zomaya, Redundancy avoidance for big data in data centers: A conventional neural network approach, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 104–114, 2020.

27

L. A. Villas, A. Boukerche, H. A. B. F. de Oliveira, R. B. de Araujo, and A. A. F. Loureiro, A spatial correlation aware algorithm to perform efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks, Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 12, pp. 69–85, 2014.

28

C. Wang, H. Ma, Y. He, and S. Xiong, Adaptive approximate data collection for wireless sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1004–1016, 2012.

29

Z. Guo, J. Peng, W. Xu, W. Liang, W. Wu, Z. Xu, B. Guo, and Y. Ivan Wu, Minimizing redundant sensing data transmissions in energy-harvesting sensor networks via exploring spatial data correlations, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 512–527, 2021.

30
A. Jain, E. Y. Chang, and Y. F. Wang, Adaptive stream resource management using Kalman Filters, in Proc. 2004 ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, Paris, France, 2006, pp. 11–22.https://doi.org/10.1145/1007568.1007573
International Journal of Crowd Science
Pages 34-43
Cite this article:
Tang J, Wu S, Wei L, et al. Energy-Efficient Sensory Data Collection Based on Spatiotemporal Correlation in IoT Networks. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2022, 6(1): 34-43. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100007

912

Views

65

Downloads

8

Crossref

9

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 03 January 2022
Revised: 05 March 2022
Accepted: 05 March 2022
Published: 15 April 2022
© The author(s) 2022

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return