AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home International Journal of Crowd Science Article
PDF (701.6 KB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

A Quantitative Analysis of the Relationship Between the Public and News Media Attentions to Hot Network Events in China

Jiaqing Liu1,2,†, Yue Wang2,†( ), Sha He3, Wuyue Shangguan4, Tianmei Wang2
School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
School of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
LinkedIn Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 94085, USA
School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Show Author Information

Abstract

With the popularity of new media, the relationship between the media and the public has changed considerably. A comprehensive and quantitative analysis of the relationship between the public and media can reveal the development of news media in China and help provide some constructive advice to improve their quality. Therefore, we establish vector autoregression (VAR) models between the media and the public on 160 network trending events from 2011 to 2018 based on the Baidu Index. In specific terms, we explore the causal relationship between them with the Granger causality test and analyze the dynamic effects using the impulse response function (IRF) analysis. Our findings suggest that there are satisfactory two-way interactions between the news media and the public in China (especially in the event categories directly related to people’s livelihood, such as safety misadventure, natural disasters, food and drug safety, and entertainment) and that the public plays a leading role for most events. We also find that the news media lags behind users generally, which prompts us to propose the three-relay hypothesis to explain its dissemination mechanism. Also, the impulse responses of attention to negative events are generally more drastic than those to positive events. For hot network events in China, the time span and sample size of our research are large, increasing the results’ reliability.

Keywords

Granger causality testvector autoregression modelimpulse response functionhot network eventpublic attentionmedia attention

References

1
M. W. Ragas, H. L. Tran, and J. A. Martin, Media-induced or search-driven? A study of online agenda-setting effects during the BP oil disaster, Journalism Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48–63, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.793509
Crossref
2
W. R. Neuman, L. Guggenheim, S. M. Jang, and S. Y. Bae, The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data, Journal of Communication, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 193–214, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088
Crossref
3
M. T. Bastos, D. Mercea, and A. Charpentier, Tents, tweets, and events: The interplay between ongoing protests and social media, Journal of Communication, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 320–350, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12145
Crossref
4
Baidu Index, http://index.baidu.com/Helper/, 2022.
5
B. Sayre, L. Bode, D. Shah, D. Wilcox, and C. Shah, Agenda setting in a digital age: Tracking attention to California proposition 8 in social media, online news and conventional news, Policy & Internet, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 7–32, 2010.https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1040
Crossref
6

Y. Peng, J. Li, H. Xia, S. Qi, and J. Li, The effects of food safety issues released by we media on consumers’ awareness and purchasing behavior: A case study in China, Food Policy, vol. 51, pp. 44–52, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

K. A. Wibowo and S. Karlinah, Detroit water shutoff: The dynamics of intermedia agenda setting, Journal of Physics:Conference Series, vol. 1114, p. 012006, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
8
Y. Ni, The impact of the development of American new media on citizens’ political power and life, in Proc. 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021), Sanya, China, 2021, pp. 905–909.https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220105.167
Crossref
9
S. Yuan and R. Zhang, A systematic review of new media influencing people’s attitude and cognition to GMF, in Proc. 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021), Sanya, China, 2021, pp. 185–189.https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220105.036
Crossref
10
L. Guggenheim, S. M. Jang, S. Y. Bae, and W. R. Neuman, The dynamics of issue frame competition in traditional and social media, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 659, no. 1, pp. 207–224, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570549
Crossref
11

H. Rui and A. Whinston, Information or attention? An empirical study of user contribution on Twitter, Information Systems and E-Business Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 309–324, 2012.
Crossref Google Scholar
12
J. Groshek and M. C. Groshek, Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2013.https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.71
Crossref
13
B. Zhang, J. Sun, H. Zhang, and C. Xu, Can promotion on WeChat official accounts improve scholarly journals’ academic impact? A micro-level correlation comparison study, Learned Publishing, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 163–174, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1440
Crossref
14
M. E. McCombs and D. L. Shaw, The agenda-setting function of mass media, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 176–187, 1972.https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Crossref
15

M. McCombs, A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future, Journalism Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 543–557, 2005.
Crossref Google Scholar
16
S. Iyengar and D. R. Kinder, News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2010.https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388601.001.0001
Crossref
17

L. V. D. Heijkant and R. Vliegenthart, Implicit frames of CSR: The interplay between the news media, organizational PR, and the public, Public Relations Review, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 645–655, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
18
S. Y. Lee and D. Riffe, Who sets the corporate social responsibility agenda in the news media? Unveiling the agenda-building process of corporations and a monitoring group, Public Relations Review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 293–305, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.007
Crossref
19

J. E. Uscinski, When does the public’s issue agenda affect the media’s issue agenda (and vice-versa)? Developing a framework for media-public influence, Social Science Quarterly, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 796–815, 2009.
Crossref Google Scholar
20
J. T. Ripberger, Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 239–259, 2011.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.x
Crossref
21

S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, The spread of true and false news online, Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

S. Ghosh, M. -H. Su, A. Abhishek, J. Suk, C. Tong, K. Kamath, O. Hills, T. Correa, C. Garlough, P. Borah, et al., Covering #metoo across the news spectrum: Political accusation and public events as drivers of press attention, The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 158–185, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
23
J. Zhu, X. Wang, J. Qin, and L. Wu, Assessing public opinion trends based on user search queries: Validity, reliability, and practicality, in Proc. 65thAnnual Conf. of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Hong Kong, China, 2012, pp. 1–7.
24
L. Kristoufek, Bitcoin meets Google trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the internet era, Scientific Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3415, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03415
Crossref
25

S. Dastgir, E. Demir, G. Downing, G. Gozgor, and C. K. M. Lau, The causal relationship between bitcoin attention and bitcoin returns: Evidence from the copula-based granger causality test, Finance Research Letters, vol. 28, pp. 160–164, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
26
L. Vaughan and Y. Chen, Data mining from web search queries: A comparison of google trends and baidu index, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23201
Crossref
27
H. Lütkepohl and M. Krätzig,Applied Time Series Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
28

S. N. Soroka, Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 264–285, 2002.
Crossref Google Scholar
29

C. W. J. Granger, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 424–438, 1969.
Crossref Google Scholar
30
J. D. Hamilton, Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2020.
31
W. Enders, Applied Econometric Time Series. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
International Journal of Crowd Science
Volume 6 Issue 2,
June 2022
Pages 53-62
DOI: 10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100011
Cite this article:
Liu J, Wang Y, He S, et al. A Quantitative Analysis of the Relationship Between the Public and News Media Attentions to Hot Network Events in China. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2022, 6(2): 53-62. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100011

1752

Views

221

Downloads

2

Crossref

2

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 19 September 2021
Revised: 31 March 2022
Accepted: 06 April 2022
Published: 30 June 2022
© The author(s) 2022

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Return