AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home International Journal of Crowd Science Article
PDF (406.8 KB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Blockchain Technology Application Maturity Assessment Model for Digital Government Public Service Projects

Yutao Yang1, Yuxuan Shi1, Tianmei Wang1( )
School of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100098, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

With the deepening application of blockchain technology, exaggerating its empowering effects has become common. In recent years, the rational assessment of the maturity of blockchain technology applications in digital projects in different fields has been the focus of attention and identified as the key to improving the implementation effect of various digital projects. Although some studies have obtained substantial research results on technology maturity and its derivative applications, which can be used to predict the overall trend of a technology or guide the implementation of the technology on the ground, few studies have evaluated the maturity of blockchain technology in combination with different application scenarios. Our study combines application scenarios and the technical characteristics of blockchain technology and proposes an evaluation system for blockchain technology application maturity consisting of five primary indicators, that is, key application requirements, data security, process complexity, application ecological completeness, and technical performance requirements, and their corresponding secondary indicators. In addition, we take digital government public service projects as application scenarios and use the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) entropy method and expert scoring method to determine the weights corresponding to each index in the assessment system and construct a blockchain technology application maturity assessment model. Moreover, we apply the model to ten typical digital government public service projects to conduct a comprehensive assessment and analysis. By comparing the indicator scores of the different projects, we analyze the project characteristics influencing blockchain technology application maturity and provide suggestions for applying “blockchain + digital government public services”.

Keywords

blockchaindigital government public servicestechnical maturityanalytic hierarchy process (AHP)AHP-entropy weight method

References

[1]
D. Tapscott and A. Tapscott, Blockchain Revolution, (in Chinese). Beijing, China: CITIC Publishing, 2016.
[2]

S. Wang, Digital government governance in China: Reality and prospects, Journal of the Party School of Guizhou Province, no. 3, pp. 87–95, 2019.
Google Scholar
[3]

X. Y. Zhang and A. X. Fan, A review of artificial intelligence based on technology maturity curve, (in Chinese), Philosophy of Science and Technology Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 14–19, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

S. Xu, A generic definition of technology maturity, Dual-Use Technologies and Products, no. 11, pp. 8–10, 2016.
Google Scholar
[5]

J. Deng, S. Ye, and X. Zheng, A review of software maturity model (CMM) development, (in Chinese), Computer Application Research, no. 7, pp. 6–9, 2002.
Google Scholar
[6]

J. Ji, K. Huang, Z. Gu, Y. Liu, S. Zhu, N. Li, and F. Ren, Empirical analysis of the relevance of Gartner trend forecast reports to scientific research, (in Chinese), Library Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 54–62, 2016.
Google Scholar
[7]

Research group on using blockchain to promote modernization of tax administration, Exploring the innovation of “Internet+taxation” based on blockchain: The practice of Shenzhen taxation bureau as an example, Taxation Research, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 2019.
Google Scholar
[8]

S. Wang, Governance theory in the digital age: Background, content and brief comments, (in Chinese), Foreign Social Science, no. 2, pp. 96–104, 2019.
Google Scholar
[9]

K. Wu and X. Yan, Digital governance-driven and public service provision model change —based on the practice of Guangdong province, E-Government, no. 1, pp. 76–83, 2020.
Google Scholar
[10]

J. Ye and Y. Wang, Exploring the path of public service supply-side reform in the context of the new era —Taking Suzhou city as an example, Administrative Tribune, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 56–61, 2018.
Google Scholar
[11]

M. Wang and J. Lu, Research on blockchain technology and its application in government governance, E-Government, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2018.
Google Scholar
[12]
M. Swan, Blockchain: Blueprint for A New Economy. Boston, MA, USA: O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2015.
[13]

Y. Tang, Q. Chen, and L. Man, Capitalization, fiscal incentives and local public service delivery —An empirical analysis based on 35 large and medium-sized cities in China, (in Chinese), Economics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 217–240, 2016.
Google Scholar
[14]

J. Liu and H. Wei, The effect of urban public services on permanent migration intention of floating population, Economic Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 20–37, 2019.
Google Scholar
[15]

X. Yang, The impact of urban public service quality on population mobility, China Journal of Population Science, no. 2, pp. 104–114, 2017.
Google Scholar
[16]

R. B. Liang and Y. Tang, Tiebout model in the supply of local public goods: An empirical study based on urban housing prices in China, World Economy, no. 10, pp. 71–83, 2008.
Google Scholar
[17]

L. Yin, Basic public services: Theory, current situation and countermeasures analysis, (in Chinese), Political Science Research, no. 5, pp. 83–96&127, 2016.
Google Scholar
[18]
D. Kong, Reinventing production relations with the power of decentralization —Blockchain industry report, https://www.waitang.com/report/16386.html, 2018.
[19]

W. Wang, Accelerating the implementation of digital government strategy: Realistic dilemma and cracking path, (in Chinese), E-Government, no. 12, pp. 86–94, 2019.
Google Scholar
[20]

R. Bi, Research on e-government based on blockchain, China Management Informationization, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 148–151, 2016.
Google Scholar
[21]
T. Ying, Research on government governance innovation based on blockchain, Master dissertation, College of Public Administration, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan, China, 2019.
[22]
J. Cardoso, J. Mendling, G. Neumann, and H. A. Reijers, A discourse on complexity of process models, in Proc. 2006 International Conference on Business Process Management Workshops, Vienna, Austria, 2006, pp. 117–128.
Crossref
[23]
J. Cardoso, Control-flow complexity measurement of processes and Weyuker’s properties, in Proc. 6th International Conference on Enformatika, Budapest, Hungary, 2005, pp. 213–218.
[24]
Towards intelligent recommendation: A blockchain white paper, China Academy of Information and Communication Research and Trusted Blockchain Promotion Program, https://www.docin.com/p-2140049639.html, 2018.
[25]

J. Cardoso, Complexity analysis of BPEL web processes, Software Process Improvement & Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2007.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]

W. Zhao and Y. Sun, Role-compatibility based measure method for process complexity, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2348–2353, 2012.
Google Scholar
[27]
F. Zhu and H. W. Zhang, “AHP+entropy weight method” based CW-TOPSIS model for predicting rockburst, Chinese Safety Science Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 128–133, 2017.
International Journal of Crowd Science
Volume 6 Issue 4,
December 2022
Pages 184-194
DOI: 10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100025
Cite this article:
Yang Y, Shi Y, Wang T. Blockchain Technology Application Maturity Assessment Model for Digital Government Public Service Projects. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2022, 6(4): 184-194. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100025

4099

Views

89

Downloads

5

Crossref

5

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 15 April 2022
Revised: 23 June 2022
Accepted: 27 June 2022
Published: 30 November 2022
© The author(s) 2022

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Return