AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (630.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Individual Behavior Modeling and Transmission Control During Disease Spread: A Review

Wengxiang Dong1( )H. Vicky Zhao1
Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information
An erratum to this article is available online at:

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a detailed review of two categories of the literature: the spontaneous protective behaviors of individuals during disease spread and the mandatory measures to control the disease spread. In the literature, the models of individual protective behaviors can be divided into two parts: the environment-induced protective behaviors and the information-induced protective behaviors. And the mandatory measures of disease control can be divided into two parts: the macro-based control methods and the micro-based control methods. We provide a detailed review to the various categories of research. Then we compare the effects of different control methods through simulation. Among the micro-based control methods, the method based on minimizing the largest eigenvalue has the best effect. This review is of crucial importance to summarize the studies of the spontaneous protective behaviors during disease spread and the mandatory measures to control the disease spread.

References

[1]
A. Lajmanovich and J. A. Yorke, A deterministic model for gonorrhea in a nonhomogeneous population, Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 28, nos. 3&4, pp. 221–236, 1976.
[2]
J. O. Kephart and S. R. White, Directed-graph epidemiological models of computer viruses, in Computation: The Micro and the Macro View, B. A. Huberman, ed. Singapore: World Scientific, 1992, pp. 71–102.
[3]

R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks, Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 14, pp. 3200–3203, 2001.

[4]

W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, vol. 115, no. 772, pp. 700–721, 1927.

[5]

H. -F. Zhang, J. -R. Xie, M. Tang, and Y. -C. Lai, Suppression of epidemic spreading in complex networks by local information based behavioral responses, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 043106, 2014.

[6]

Q. Wu, X. Fu, M. Small, and X. -J. Xu, The impact of awareness on epidemic spreading in networks, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 013101, 2012.

[7]

F. Bagnoli, P. Liò, and L. Sguanci, Risk perception in epidemic modeling, Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 76, no. 6, p. 061904, 2007.

[8]

Y. Shang, Modeling epidemic spread with awareness and heterogeneous transmission rates in networks, Journal of Biological Physics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 489–500, 2013.

[9]

S. Funk, E. Gilad, C. Watkins, and V. A. Jansen, The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 16, pp. 6872–6877, 2009.

[10]

C. Granell, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Dynamical interplay between awareness and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks, Physical Review Letters, vol. 111, no. 12, p. 128701, 2013.

[11]

C. Granell, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Competing spreading processes on multiplex networks: Awareness and epidemics, Physical Review E, vol. 90, no. 1, p. 012808, 2014.

[12]

Z. Wang, Q. Guo, S. Sun, and C. Xia, The impact of awareness diffusion on SIR-like epidemics in multiplex networks, Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 349, pp. 134–147, 2019.

[13]

C. Zheng, C. Xia, Q. Guo, and M. Dehmer, Interplay between SIR-based disease spreading and awareness diffusion on multiplex networks, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 115, pp. 20–28, 2018.

[14]
S. Song, Z. Zong, Y. Li, X. Liu, and Y. Yu, Reinforced epidemic control: Saving both lives and economy, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2008.01257, 2020.
[15]
R. Wan, X. Zhang, and R. Song, Multi-objective reinforcement learning for infectious disease control with application to COVID-19 spread, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2009.04607, 2020.
[16]

A. R. Hota, J. Godbole, and P. E. Pare, A closed-loop framework for inference, prediction, and control of SIR epidemics on networks, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2262–2278, 2021.

[17]
J. R. Birge, O. Candogan, and Y. Feng, Controlling epidemic spread: Reducing economic losses with targeted closures, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590621, 2020.
[18]
T. Andersson, A. Erlanson, D. Spiro, and R. Östling, Optimal trade-off between economic activity and health during an epidemic, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2005.07590, 2020.
[19]
D. W. Berger, K. F. Herkenhoff, and S. Mongey, An SEIR infectious disease model with testing and conditional quarantine, Tech. Rep. 597, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY, USA, 2020.
[20]
P. D. Fajgelbaum, A. Khandelwal, W. Kim, C. Mantovani, and E. Schaal, Optimal lockdown in a commuting network, American Economic Review: Insights, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 503–522, 2021.
[21]
Y. Wang, D. Chakrabarti, C. Wang, and C. Faloutsos, Epidemic spreading in real networks: An eigenvalue viewpoint, in Proc. 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, Florence, Italy, 2003, pp. 25–34.
[22]
J. Piccini, F. Robledo, and P. Romero, Node-immunization strategies in a stochastic epidemic model, in Proc. First International Workshop on Machine Learning, Optimization, and Big Data, Sicily, Italy, 2015, pp. 222–232.
[23]

R. Cohen, S. Havlin, and D. Ben-Avraham, Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations, Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 24, p. 247901, 2003.

[24]
S. Nagaraja, Unlinking super-linkers: The topology of epidemic response (COVID-19), arXiv preprint arXiv: 2006.02241, 2020.
[25]

N. Masuda, Immunization of networks with community structure, New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 123018, 2009.

[26]

N. Gupta, A. Singh, and H. Cherifi, Centrality measures for networks with community structure, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 452, pp. 46–59, 2016.

[27]
H. Tong, B. A. Prakash, C. Tsourakakis, T. Eliassi-Rad, C. Faloutsos, and D. H. Chau, On the vulnerability of large graphs, in Proc. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Sydney, Australia, 2010, pp. 1091–1096.
[28]

C. Chen, H. Tong, B. A. Prakash, C. E. Tsourakakis, T. Eliassi-Rad, C. Faloutsos, and D. H. Chau, Node immunization on large graphs: Theory and algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 2015.

[29]
M. Ahmad, J. Tariq, M. Shabbir, and I. Khan, Spectral methods for immunization of large networks, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1711.00791, 2017.
[30]

C. Saxena, M. Doja, and T. Ahmad, Group based centrality for immunization of complex networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 508, pp. 35–47, 2018.

[31]
H. Tong, B. A. Prakash, T. Eliassi-Rad, M. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos, Gelling, and melting, large graphs by edge manipulation, in Proc. 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Maui, HI, USA, 2012, pp. 245–254.
[32]
C. J. Kuhlman, G. Tuli, S. Swarup, M. V. Marathe, and S. S. Ravi, Blocking simple and complex contagion by edge removal, in Proc. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, Dallas, TX, USA, 2013, pp. 399–408.
[33]

C. Chen, H. Tong, B. A. Prakash, T. Eliassi-Rad, M. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos, Eigen-optimization on large graphs by edge manipulation, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–30, 2016.

[34]
E. Gourdin, J. Omic, and P. V. Mieghem, Optimization of network protection against virus spread, in Proc. 2011 8th International Workshop on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN), Krakow, Poland, 2011, pp. 86–93.
[35]

V. M. Preciado, M. Zargham, C. Enyioha, A. Jadbabaie, and G. J. Pappas, Optimal resource allocation for network protection against spreading processes, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–108, 2014.

[36]
N. J. Watkins, C. Nowzari, V. M. Preciado, and G. J. Pappas, Optimal resource allocation for competing epidemics over arbitrary networks, in Proc. 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, IL, USA, 2015, pp. 1381–1386.
[37]

N. J. Watkins, C. Nowzari, V. M. Preciado, and G. J. Pappas, Optimal resource allocation for competitive spreading processes on bilayer networks, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 298–307, 2016.

International Journal of Crowd Science
Pages 223-229
Cite this article:
Dong W, Zhao HV. Individual Behavior Modeling and Transmission Control During Disease Spread: A Review. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2022, 6(4): 223-229. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100027

3749

Views

50

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 23 February 2022
Revised: 22 March 2022
Accepted: 23 March 2022
Published: 30 November 2022
© The author(s) 2022

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return