AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (975.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Dynamic Task Offloading and Service Migration Optimization in Edge Networks

Yibo Han1( )Xiaocui Li2Zhangbing Zhou2,3
Nanyang Institute of Big Data Research, Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473004, China
School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Computer Science Department, TELECOM SudParis, Evry 91000, France
Show Author Information

Abstract

In recent years, edge computing has emerged as a promising paradigm for providing flexible and reliable services for Internet of things (IoT) applications. User requests can be offloaded and processed in real time at the edge of a network. However, considering the limited storage and computing resources of IoT devices, certain services requested by users may not be configured on current edge servers. In this setting, user requests should be offloaded to adjacent edge servers or requested edge servers should be configured by migrating certain services from the former, further reducing the service access delay of user requests and the energy consumption of IoT devices in such networks. To address this issue, in this study, we model this dynamic task offloading and service migration optimization problem as the multiple dimensional Markov decision process and propose a deep q-learning network (DQN) algorithm to achieve fast decision-making, an approximate optimal task offloading, and service migration solution. Experimental results show that our algorithm performs better than existing baseline approaches in terms of reducing the service access delay of user requests and the energy consumption of IoT devices in edge networks.

References

[1]

M. Goudarzi, H. Wu, M. Palaniswami, and R. Buyya, An application placement technique for concurrent IoT applications in edge and fog computing environments, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1298–1311, 2021.

[2]
E. Yigitoglu, M. Mohamed, L. Liu, and H. Ludwig, Foggy: A framework for continuous automated IoT application deployment in fog computing, in Proc. 2017 IEEE International Conference on AI Mobile Services, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017, pp. 38–45.
[3]

Y. Liu, M. Peng, G. Shou, Y. Chen, and S. Chen, Towards edge intelligence: Multi-access edge computing for 5G and internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 6722–6747, 2020.

[4]

C. S. Yang, R. Pedarsani, and A. S. Avestimehr, Edge computing in the dark: Leveraging contextual-combinatorial bandit and coded computing, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1022–1031, 2021.

[5]

S. Chen, Y. Zheng, W. Lu, V. Varadarajan, and K. Wang, Energy-optimal dynamic computation offloading for industrial IoT in fog computing, IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 566–576, 2020.

[6]

M. Adhikari, M. Mukherjee, and S. N. Srirama, DPTO: A deadline and priority-aware task offloading in fog computing framework leveraging multilevel feedback queueing, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 5773–5782, 2020.

[7]
G. Zhang, F. Shen, Y. Yang, H. Qian, and W. Yao, Fair task offloading among fog nodes in fog computing networks, in Proc. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Kansas City, MO, USA, 2018, pp. 1–6.
[8]

H. Wang, H. Xu, H. Huang, M. Chen, and S. Chen, Robust task offloading in dynamic edge computing, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 500–514, 2021.

[9]

J. Wang, J. Hu, G. Min, A. Y. Zomaya, and N. Georgalas, Fast adaptive task offloading in edge computing based on meta reinforcement learning, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 242–253, 2021.

[10]

H. Tran-Dang and D. -S. Kim, FRATO: Fog resource based adaptive task offloading for delay-minimizing IoT service provisioning, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2491–2508, 2021.

[11]

C. Lin and H. Khazaei, Modeling and optimization of performance and cost of serverless applications, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 615–632, 2020.

[12]
C. Puliafito, E. Mingozzi, and G. Anastasi, Fog computing for the internet of mobile things: Issues and challenges, in Proc. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, Hong Kong, China, 2017, pp. 1–6.
[13]

J. Xu, X. Ma, A. Zhou, Q. Duan, and S. Wang, Path selection for seamless service migration in vehicular edge computing, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 9040–9049, 2020.

[14]

R. Zhang, L. Wen, S. Naboulsi, T. Eason, V. K. Vasudevan, and D. Qian, Accelerated multiscale space—Time finite element simulation and application to high cycle fatigue life prediction, Computational Mechanics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 329–349, 2016.

[15]
Z. Liang, Y. Liu, T. -M. Lok, and K. Huang, Multi-cell mobile edge computing: Joint service migration and resource allocation, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, doi: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3070974.
[16]
T. Kim, S. D. Sathyanarayana, S. Chen, Y. Im, X. Zhang, S. Ha, and C. Joe-Wong, MoDEMS: Optimizing edge computing migrations for user mobility, in Proc. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, London, UK, 2022, pp. 1159–1168.
[17]
Y. Miao, F. Lyu, F. Wu, H. Wu, J. Ren, Y. Zhang, and X. S. Shen, Mobility-aware service migration for seamless provision: A reinforcement learning approach, in Proc. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2022, pp. 5064–5069.
International Journal of Crowd Science
Pages 16-23
Cite this article:
Han Y, Li X, Zhou Z. Dynamic Task Offloading and Service Migration Optimization in Edge Networks. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2023, 7(1): 16-23. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100031

533

Views

34

Downloads

4

Crossref

4

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 11 January 2022
Revised: 08 September 2022
Accepted: 11 September 2022
Published: 31 March 2023
© The author(s) 2023

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return