AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home International Journal of Crowd Science Article
PDF (1.1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Role of Technology Self-Efficacy and Digital Alliance in Digital Mental Health Tool Acceptance Among University Students in Singapore

Toh Hsiang Benny Tan1,2( ), Sufang Lim2, Chan Hua Nicholas Vun1
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
Joint NTU-WeBank Research Centre on Fintech, Singapore 637335, Singapore
Show Author Information

Abstract

Mental health challenges, accentuated by stress, are escalating in high-income countries, especially among adolescents and university students. Traditional mental health approaches face issues such as scalability and accessibility, making the emergence of digital tools crucial. However, adherence remains a challenge. This study examines the role of technology self-efficacy and digital alliance in influencing the acceptance of digital mental health tools among Singaporean university students. The results provide strong support for the role of digital alliance as a key factor impacting a student’s intention to use mental health tools, as well as technology self-efficacy and digital alliance as serial mediators of task-technology fit and intention to use, highlighting our ever-evolving relationship with technology.

Keywords

task-technology fittechnology acceptancetechnology self-efficacydigital alliancedigital mental healthintention to use

References

[1]
F. D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, PhD dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986.
[2]

F. D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]

K. Mathieson, E. Peacock, and W. W. Chin, Extending the technology acceptance model, ACM SIGMIS Database DATABASE Adv. Inf. Syst., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 86–112, 2001.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

S. Taylor and P. A. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 144–176, 1995.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]

K. M. Kuo, C. F. Liu, and C. C. Ma, An investigation of the effect of nurses’ technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems, BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., vol. 13, p. 88, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]

S. A. Kamal, M. Shafiq, and P. Kakria, Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM), Technol. Soc., vol. 60, p. 101212, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]

M. El-Wajeeh, P. G. H. Galal-Edeen, and D. H. Mokhtar, Technology acceptance model for mobile health systems, IOSR J. Mob. Comput. Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2014.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

J. Razmak and C. Bélanger, Using the technology acceptance model to predict patient attitude toward personal health records in regional communities, Inf. Technol. People, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 306–326, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

C. Nadal, C. Sas, and G. Doherty, Technology acceptance in mobile health: Scoping review of definitions, models, and measurement, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 7, p. e17256, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]

T. Shemesh and S. Barnoy, Assessment of the intention to use mobile health applications using a technology acceptance model in an Israeli adult population, Telemed. J. E Health, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1141–1149, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

D. L. Goodhue and R. L. Thompson, Task-technology fit and individual performance, MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 213–236, 1995.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]

X. Wang, Y. D. Wong, T. Chen, and K. F. Yuen, Adoption of shopper-facing technologies under social distancing: A conceptualisation and an interplay between task-technology fit and technology trust, Comput Hum Behav, vol. 124, p. 106900, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]

D. Tao, Z. Chen, M. Qin, and M. Cheng, Modeling consumer acceptance and usage behaviors of m-health: An integrated model of self-determination theory, task-technology fit, and the technology acceptance model, Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1550, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]

I. Alyoussef, E-learning acceptance: The role of task-technology fit as sustainability in higher education, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6450, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]

H. C. Lin, X. Han, T. Lyu, W. H. Ho, Y. Xu, T. C. Hsieh, L. Zhu, and L. Zhang, Task-technology fit analysis of social media use for marketing in the tourism and hospitality industry: A systematic literature review, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2677–2715, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]

G. McLean, Examining the determinants and outcomes of mobile app engagement—A longitudinal perspective, Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 84, pp. 392–403, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]

K. L. Hsiao, What drives smartwatch adoption intention? Comparing Apple and non-Apple watches, Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 186–206, 2017.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]

A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]

D. R. Compeau and C. A. Higgins, Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test, MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–211, 1995.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]

M. H. Hsu and C. M. Chiu, Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance, Decis. Support. Syst., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 369–381, 2004.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
E. Neter and E. Brainin, eHealth literacy: Extending the digital divide to the realm of health information, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 14, no. 1, p. e19, 2012.
Crossref
[22]

A. Balapour, I. Reychav, R. Sabherwal, and J. Azuri, Mobile technology identity and self-efficacy: Implications for the adoption of clinically supported mobile health apps, Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 49, pp. 58–68, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]

I. Reychav, R. Beeri, A. Balapour, D. R. Raban, R. Sabherwal, and J. Azuri, How reliable are self-assessments using mobile technology in healthcare? The effects of technology identity and self-efficacy, Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 91, pp. 52–61, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]

E. S. Bordin, The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance, Psychother. Theory Res. Pract., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 252–260, 1979.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]

S. D’Alfonso, R. Lederman, S. Bucci, and K. Berry, The digital therapeutic alliance and human-computer interaction, JMIR Ment. Health, vol. 7, no. 12, p. e21895, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]

M. Sucala, J. B. Schnur, M. J. Constantino, S. J. Miller, E. H. Brackman, and G. H. Montgomery, The therapeutic relationship in e-therapy for mental health: A systematic review, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 14, no. 4, p. e110, 2012.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]

F. Tong, R. Lederman, S. D’Alfonso, K. Berry, and S. Bucci, Digital therapeutic alliance with fully automated mental health smartphone apps: A narrative review, Front. Psychiatry, vol. 13, p. 819623, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]

P. Henson, H. Wisniewski, C. Hollis, M. Keshavan, and J. Torous, Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: Initial review, BJPsych Open, vol. 5, no. 1, p. e15, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
M. T. Dishaw, D. Strong, and D. Bandy, Extending the task-technology fit model with self-efficacy constructs, in Proc. 8th Americas Conf. Information Systems, Dallas, TX, USA, 2002, pp. 1021–1027.
[30]

T. Zhou, Y. Lu, and B. Wang, Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 760–767, 2010.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]

M. T. Dishaw and D. M. Strong, Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs, Inf. Manag., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 1999.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]

M. J. Keith, J. S. Babb, P. B. Lowry, C. P. Furner, and A. Abdullat, The role of mobile-computing self-efficacy in consumer information disclosure, Inf. Syst. J., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 637–667, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]

G. M. Marakas, M. Y. Yi, and R. D. Johnson, The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research, Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 126–163, 1998.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]

J. G. Perle, L. C. Langsam, A. Randel, S. Lutchman, A. B. Levine, A. P. Odland, B. Nierenberg, and C. D. Marker, Attitudes toward psychological telehealth: Current and future clinical psychologists’ opinions of Internet-based interventions, J. Clin. Psychol., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 100–113, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]

D. Compeau, C. A. Higgins, and S. Huff, Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study, MIS Q., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 1999.
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]

H. Liang and Y. Xue, Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective, MIS Q., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 71–90, 2009.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]

D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, and D. W. Straub, Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model, MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–90, 2003.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Manag. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]

D. H. Shin and F. Biocca, Health experience model of personal informatics: The case of a quantified self, Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 69, pp. 62–74, 2017.
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]

P. A. Pavlou, Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model, Int. J. Electron. Commer., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 101–134, 2003.
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]

G. C. Moore and I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192–222, 1991.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]

J. Tavares and T. Oliveira, Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: An acceptance model and survey, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 18, no. 3, p. e49, 2016.
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]

C. K. Or, B. T. Karsh, D. J. Severtson, L. J. Burke, R. L. Brown, and P. F. Brennan, Factors affecting home care patients’ acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2011.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]

C. M. Angst and R. Agarwal, Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion, MIS Q., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 339–370, 2009.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]

H. F. Lin, The impact of website quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in the B2C E-commerce context, Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 363–378, 2007.
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]

H. K. Y. Almathami, K. T. Win, and E. Vlahu-Gjorgievska, Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: Systematic literature review, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 2, p. e16407, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]

V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decis. Sci., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–315, 2008.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]

P. A. Pavlou and M. Fygenson, Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior, MIS Q., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 115–143, 2006.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]

S. S. Al-gahtani, Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model, Appl. Comput. Inform., vol. 12, pp. 27–50, 2016.
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]

J. Kim and H. A. Park, Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers’ health behavior intention, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 14, no. 5, p. e133, 2012.
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]

N. Kock and P. Hadaya, Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods, Inf. Syst. J., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 227–261, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]

W. W. Chin, Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Q., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 1998.
Google Scholar
[54]
R. H. Hoyle, The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues, in Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, R. H. Hoyle, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 1995, pp. 1–15.
[55]

D. W. Straub, Validating instruments in MIS research, MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 147–169, 1989.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]

I. Klopping and E. McKinney, Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer E-commerce, Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2004.
Google Scholar
[57]

T. K. Yu and T. Y. Yu, Modelling the factors that affect individuals’ utilisation of online learning systems: An empirical study combining the task technology fit model with the theory of planned behaviour, Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1003–1017, 2010.
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]

A. S. Ahadzadeh, S. P. Sharif, F. S. Ong, and K. W. Khong, Integrating health belief model and technology acceptance model: An investigation of health-related Internet use, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. e45, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]

S. B. Goldberg, S. A. Baldwin, K. M. Riordan, J. Torous, C. J. Dahl, R. J. Davidson, and M. J. Hirshberg, Alliance with an unguided smartphone app: Validation of the digital working alliance inventory, Assessment, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1331–1345, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]

D. Becker, Acceptance of mobile mental health treatment applications, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 220–227, 2016.
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]

D. Gefen, D. Straub, and M. C. Boudreau, Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 7, 2000.
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]

J. F. Hair, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011.
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]

J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychol. Bull., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 411–423, 1988.
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]
J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2021.
Crossref
[65]
A. D. R. McQuarrie and C. L. Tsai, Regression and Time Series Model Selection. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 1998.
Crossref
International Journal of Crowd Science
Volume 8 Issue 3,
September 2024
Pages 101-109
DOI: 10.26599/IJCS.2024.9100001
Cite this article:
Tan THB, Lim S, Vun CHN. Role of Technology Self-Efficacy and Digital Alliance in Digital Mental Health Tool Acceptance Among University Students in Singapore. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2024, 8(3): 101-109. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2024.9100001

304

Views

37

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics
Published: 19 August 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Return