AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Advanced Ceramics Article
PDF (1.2 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Successful preparation of BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3–δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells

Yanru Yin, Yanbin Zhou, Yueyuan Gu, Lei Bi( )
School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

A pure phase BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3–δ (BCF), which cannot be obtained before, is successfully prepared in this study by using the calcination method with a rapid cooling procedure. The successful preparation of BCF allows the evaluation of this material as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells (H-SOFCs) for the first time. An H-SOFC using the BCF cathode achieves an encouraging fuel cell performance of 2012 mW·cm–2 at 700 ℃, two-fold higher than that of a similar cell using the classical high-performance Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3–δ (BSCF) cathode. First-principles calculations reveal the mechanism for the performance enhancement, indicating that the new BCF cathode significantly lowers the energy barriers in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) compared with the BSCF cathode. Therefore, improved cathode performance and fuel cell output are obtained for the BCF cell. The fuel cell using the BCF cathode also shows excellent long-term stability that can work stably for nearly 900 h without noticeable degradations. The fuel cell performance and long-term stability of the current BCF cell are superior to most of the H-SOFCs reported in previous reports, suggesting that BCF is a promising cathode for H-SOFCs.

Keywords

BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3–δcathodeproton conductorsolid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs)

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JAC0707_ESM.pdf (432.9 KB)

References

[1]
Wang SY, Jiang SP. Prospects of fuel cell technologies. Nat Sci Rev 2017, 4: 163–166.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan DQ, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature 2021, 591: 246–251.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Zhang YW, Mei J, Yan C, et al. Bioinspired 2D nanomaterials for sustainable applications. Adv Mater 2020, 32: e1902806.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Mei J, Liao T, Liang J, et al. Toward promising cathode catalysts for nonlithium metal–oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2020, 10: 1901997.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Wei T, Qiu P, Yang J, et al. High-performance direct carbon dioxide-methane solid oxide fuel cell with a structure-engineered double-layer anode. J Power Sources 2021, 484: 229199.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Li PZ, Yang W, Tian CJ, et al. Electrochemical performance of La2NiO4+δ–Ce0.55La0.45O2−δ as a promising bifunctional oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 328–337.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Zvonareva IA, Mineev AM, Tarasova NA, et al. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn1−xScxO3−δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1131–1143.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
He F, Gao QN, Liu ZQ, et al. A new Pd doped proton conducting perovskite oxide with multiple functionalities for efficient and stable power generation from ammonia at reduced temperatures. Adv Energy Mater 2021, 11: 2003916.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Chen M, Xie XB, Guo JH, et al. Space charge layer effect at the platinum anode/BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ electrolyte interface in proton ceramic fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 12566–12575.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Chen M, Chen DC, Wang K, et al. Densification and electrical conducting behavior of BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ proton conducting ceramics with NiO additive. J Alloys Compd 2019, 781: 857–865.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Wu S, Xu X, Li XM, et al. High-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using the first-generation Sr-doped LaMnO3 cathode tailored with Zn ions. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 675–682.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Cao D, Zhou MY, Yan XM, et al. High performance low-temperature tubular protonic ceramic fuel cells based on Barium cerate-zirconate electrolyte. Electrochem Commun 2021, 125: 106986.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Bu YF, Joo S, Zhang YX, et al. A highly efficient composite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2020, 451: 227812.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Tarutin AP, Lyagaeva JG, Medvedev DA, et al. Recent advances in layered Ln2NiO4+δ nickelates: Fundamentals and prospects of their applications in protonic ceramic fuel and electrolysis cells. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 154–195.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Xie D, Li K, Yang J, et al. High-performance La0.5(Ba0.75Ca0.25)0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 2021, 46: 10007–10014.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Yin YR, Dai HL, Yu SF, et al. Tailoring cobalt-free La0.5Sr0.5FeO3−δ cathode with a nonmetal cation-doping strategy for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. SusMat 2022, 2: 607–616.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Song YF, Chen YB, Wang W, et al. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule 2019, 3: 2842–2853.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Ding HP, Wu W, Jiang C, et al. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat Commun 2020, 11: 1907.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Ling YH, Guo TM, Guo YY, et al. New two-layer Ruddlesden–Popper cathode materials for protonic ceramics fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1052–1060.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Xia YP, Jin ZZ, Wang HQ, et al. A novel cobalt-free cathode with triple-conduction for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with unprecedented performance. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 16136–16148.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Li J, Hou J, Lu Y, et al. Ca-containing Ba0.95Ca0.05Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ cathode with high CO2-poisoning tolerance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2020, 453: 227909.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Meng YQ, Duffy J, Na BT, et al. Oxygen exchange and bulk diffusivity of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ: Quantitative assessment of active cathode material for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Solid State Ion 2021, 368: 115639.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Duan CC, Tong JH, Shang M, et al. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science 2015, 349: 1321–1326.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Liang MZ, He F, Zhou C, et al. Nickel-doped BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ as a new high-performance cathode for both oxygen-ion and proton conducting fuel cells. Chem Eng J 2021, 420: 127717.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Zhou W, Ran R, Shao ZP. Progress in understanding and development of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ-based cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells: A review. J Power Sources 2009, 192: 231–246.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Shao ZP, Haile SM. A high-performance cathode for the next generation of solid-oxide fuel cells. Nature 2004, 431: 170–173.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Guo YM, Lin Y, Ran R, et al. Zirconium doping effect on the performance of proton-conducting BaZryCe0.8−yY0.2O3−δ (0.0 ≤ y ≤ 0.8) for fuel cell applications. J Power Sources 2009, 193: 400–407.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Li XM, Liu YH, Liu WY, et al. Mo-doping allows high performance for a perovskite cathode applied in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2021, 5: 4261–4267.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Bi L, Shafi SP, Da'as EH, et al. Tailoring the cathode-electrolyte interface with nanoparticles for boosting the solid oxide fuel cell performance of chemically stable proton-conducting electrolytes. Small 2018, 14: e1801231.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Xu YS, Xu X, Cao N, et al. Perovskite ceramic oxide as an efficient electrocatalyst for nitrogen fixation. Int J Hydrog Energy 2021, 46: 10293–10302.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Wang B, Liu XH, Bi L, et al. Fabrication of high-performance proton-conducting electrolytes from microwave prepared ultrafine powders for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2019, 412: 664–669.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1999, 59: 1758–1775.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 1996, 54: 11169–11186.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Xu X, Wang HQ, Fronzi M, et al. Tailoring cations in a perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 20624–20632.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Yang X, Yin YR, Yu SF, et al. Gluing Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ with Co3O4 as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2022, .
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Xu YS, Yu SF, Yin YR, et al. Taking advantage of Li-evaporation in LiCoO2 as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1849–1859.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Xi XA, Liu JW, Fan Y, et al. Reducing d-p band coupling to enhance CO2 electrocatalytic activity by Mg-doping in Sr2FeMoO6−δ double perovskite for high performance solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy 2021, 82: 105707.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Ji QQ, Xu X, Liu XH, et al. Improvement of the catalytic properties of porous lanthanum manganite for the oxygen reduction reaction by partial substitution of strontium for lanthanum. Electrochem Commun 2021, 124: 106964.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Chen C, Wang XT, Zhong JH, et al. Epitaxially grown heterostructured SrMn3O6–x–SrMnO3 with high-valence Mn3+/4+ for improved oxygen reduction catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 2021, 60: 22043–22050.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Xu YS, Liu XH, Cao N, et al. Defect engineering for electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction at ambient conditions. Sustain Mater Technol 2021, 27: e00229.
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Tao ZR, Xu X, Bi L. Density functional theory calculations for cathode materials of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: A mini-review. Electrochem Commun 2021, 129: 107072.
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Zhang XH, Pei CL, Chang X, et al. FeO6 octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO2 splitting. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142: 11540–11549.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Xu X, Xu YS, Ma JM, et al. Tailoring electronic structure of perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Power Sources 2021, 489: 229486.
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Zhou W, Shao ZP, Ran R, et al. A novel efficient oxideelectrode for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction at 400–600 ℃. Chem Commun 2008: 5791–5793.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Xie Y, Shi N, Huan DM, et al. A stable and efficient cathode for fluorine-containing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem 2018, 11: 3423–3430.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Pikalova E, Kolchugin A, Koroleva M, et al. Functionality of an oxygen Ca3Co4O9+δ electrode for reversible solid oxide electrochemical cells based on proton-conducting electrolytes. J Power Sources 2019, 438: 226996.
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Ren RZ, Wang ZH, Meng XG, et al. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2020, 3: 4914–4922.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Wang Q, Hou J, Fan Y, et al. Pr2BaNiMnO7–δ double-layered Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite oxides as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for low temperature proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 7704–7712.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Zhou X, Hou NJ, Gan T, et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction reaction activity of BaCe0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells via Pr-doping. J Power Sources 2021, 495: 229776.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Xu Y, Hu F, Guo YM, et al. Probing oxygen reduction and water uptake kinetics of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1−xZnxO3−δ cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Sep Purif Technol 2022, 297: 121482.
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Zhang LL, Yin YR, Xu YS, et al. Tailoring Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ with Sc as a new single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 1485–1494.
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Yin YR, Yu SF, Dai HL, et al. Triggering interfacial activity of the traditional La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 cathode with Co-doping for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 1726–1734.
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Zhang LL, Dai G, Yu SF, et al. BaTb0.3Fe0.7O3–δ: A new proton-conductor-derived cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2022, 6: 4375–4382.
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Ma ZL, Ye QR, Zhang BK, et al. A highly efficient and robust bifunctional perovskite-type air electrode with triple-conducting behavior for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Funct Mater 2022, 32: 2209054.
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Zou D, Yi YN, Song YF, et al. The BaCe0.16Y0.04Fe0.8O3–δ nanocomposite: A new high-performance cobalt-free triple-conducting cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells operating at reduced temperatures. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 5381–5390.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
Jing JM, Lei Z, Wu Z, et al. Ba0.95La0.05Fe0.8Ni0.2O3−δ perovskite as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Eur Ceram Soc 2022, 42: 6566–6573.
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Dai HL, Yin YR, Li XM, et al. A new Sc-doped La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ cathode allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustain Mater Technol 2022, 32: e00409.
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Xu YS, Xu X, Bi L. A high-entropy spinel ceramic oxide as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 794–804.
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Muñoz-García AB, Tuccillo M, Pavone M. Computational design of cobalt-free mixed proton-electron conductors for solid oxide electrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 11825–11833.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Volume 12 Issue 3,
March 2023
Pages 587-597
DOI: 10.26599/JAC.2023.9220707
Cite this article:
Yin Y, Zhou Y, Gu Y, et al. Successful preparation of BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3–δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2023, 12(3): 587-597. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2023.9220707

3619

Views

757

Downloads

63

Crossref

57

Web of Science

59

Scopus

6

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 29 September 2022
Accepted: 08 December 2022
Published: 16 February 2023
© The Author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return