One potential solution to the problems of energy storage and conversion is the use of reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells (R-PCEC), which are based on the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology and offer a flexible route to the generation of renewable fuels. However, the R-PCEC development faces a range of significant challenges, including slow oxygen reaction kinetics, inadequate durability, and poor round-trip efficiency resulting from the inadequacy of an air electrode. To address these issues, we report novel B-sites doped Pr0.5Ba0.5Co0.7Fe0.3O3−δ (PBCF) with varying amounts of Sn as the air electrode for R-PCEC to further enhance electrochemical performance at lower temperatures. At 600 ℃, R-PCEC with an air electrode consisting of Pr0.5Ba0.5Co0.7Fe0.25Sn0.05O3+δ has achieved peak power density of 1.12 W∙cm−2 in the fuel cell mode and current density of 1.79 A∙cm−2 in the electrolysis mode at a voltage of 1.3 V. Moreover, R-PCECs have shown good stability in the electrolysis mode of 100 h. This study presents a practical method for developing durable high-performance air electrodes for R-PCECs.
Xu K, Zhang H, Xu YS, et al. An efficient steam-induced heterostructured air electrode for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Adv Funct Materials 2022, 32: 2110998.
Zhang Y, Shen LY, Wang YH, et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction kinetics of IT-SOFC cathode with PrBaCo2O5+ δ /Gd0.1Ce1.9O2− δ coherent interface. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 3495–3505.
Ndubuisi A, Abouali S, Singh K, et al. Recent advances, practical challenges, and perspectives of intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 2196–2227.
Pei K, Zhou YC, Xu K, et al. Surface restructuring of a perovskite-type air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Nat Commun 2022, 13: 2207.
Duan CC, Kee R, Zhu HY, et al. Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production. Nat Energy 2019, 4: 230–240.
Ding HP, Wu W, Jiang C, et al. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat Commun 2020, 11: 1907.
He F, Liu S, Wu T, et al. Catalytic self-assembled air electrode for highly active and durable reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Adv Funct Materials 2022, 32: 2206756.
Rajendran S, Thangavel NK, Ding HP, et al. Tri-doped BaCeO3−BaZrO3 as a chemically stable electrolyte with high proton-conductivity for intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020, 12: 38275–38284.
Leonard K, Okuyama Y, Takamura Y, et al. Efficient intermediate-temperature steam electrolysis with Y:SrZrO3–SrCeO3 and Y:BaZrO3–BaCeO3 proton conducting perovskites. J Mater Chem A 2018, 6: 19113–19124.
Wang WJ, Li YT, Liu Y, et al. Ruddlesden–popper-structured (Pr0.9La0.1)2(Ni0.8Cu0.2)O4+ δ : An effective oxygen electrode material for proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2021, 9: 10913–10919.
Kim J, Sengodan S, Kim S, et al. Proton conducting oxides: A review of materials and applications for renewable energy conversion and storage. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2019, 109: 606–618.
Duan CC, Tong JH, Shang M, et al. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science 2015, 349: 1321–1326.
Xu YS, Xu X, Bi L. A high-entropy spinel ceramic oxide as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 794–804.
Xu K, Pei K, Zhao BT, et al. An oxygen reduction reaction active and durable SOFC cathode/electrolyte interface achieved via a cost-effective spray-coating. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2021, 46: 32242–32249.
Fabbri E, Bi L, Pergolesi D, et al. High-performance composite cathodes with tailored mixed conductivity for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells using proton conducting electrolytes. Energ Environ Sci 2011, 4: 4984–4993.
Rao YY, Zhong SH, He F, et al. Cobalt-doped BaZrO3: A single phase air electrode material for reversible solid oxide cells. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012, 37: 12522–12527.
Mather GC, Muñoz-Gil D, Zamudio-García J, et al. Perspectives on cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Appl Sci 2021, 11: 5363.
Shen MH, Ai FJ, Ma HL, et al. Progress and prospects of reversible solid oxide fuel cell materials. iScience 2021, 24: 103464.
Grimaud A, Mauvy F, Bassat JM, et al. Hydration properties and rate determining steps of the oxygen reduction reaction of perovskite-related oxides as H+-SOFC cathodes. J Electrochem Soc 2012, 159: B683–B694.
Yin YR, Zhou YB, Gu YY, et al. Successful preparation of BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3– δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 587–597.
Ding HP, Xue XJ. Proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells with layered PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+ δ perovskite cathode. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010, 35: 2486–2490.
Kim J, Sengodan S, Kwon G, et al. Triple-conducting layered perovskites as cathode materials for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem 2014, 7: 2811–2815.
Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan DQ, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature 2021, 591: 246–251.
Jin FJ, Li JH, Wang Y, et al. Evaluation of Fe and Mn Co-doped layered perovskite PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Mn1/2O5+ δ as a novel cathode for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell. Ceram Int 2018, 44: 22489–22496.
Shabri HA, Othman MHD, Mohamed MA, et al. Recent progress in metal−ceramic anode of solid oxide fuel cell for direct hydrocarbon fuel utilization: A review. Fuel Process Technol 2021, 212: 106626.
Takenaka K, Inoue N, Mizuno Y, et al. Extended operating temperature window of giant negative thermal expansion in Sn-doped Ca2RuO4. Appl Phys Lett 2018, 113: 071902.
Zvonareva IA, Mineev AM, Tarasova NA, et al. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn1− x Sc x O3− δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1131–1143.
Xia YP, Jin ZZ, Wang HQ, et al. A novel cobalt-free cathode with triple-conduction for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with unprecedented performance. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 16136–16148.
Xia WW, Li Q, Sun LP, et al. Electrochemical performance of Sn-doped Bi0.5Sr0.5FeO3- δ perovskite as cathode electrocatalyst for solid oxide fuel cells. J Alloys Compd 2020, 835: 155406.
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 1996, 54: 11169–11186.
Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1994, 50: 17953–17979.
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77: 3865–3868.
Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 1976, 13: 5188–5192.
Peña MA, Fierro JL. Chemical structures and performance of perovskite oxides. Chem Rev 2001, 101: 1981–2018.
Kida T, Takauchi D, Watanabe K, et al. Oxygen permeation properties of partially A-site substituted BaFeO3– δ perovskites. J Electrochem Soc 2009, 156: E187.
Chen YC, Yashima M, Ohta T, et al. Crystal structure, oxygen deficiency, and oxygen diffusion path of perovskite-type lanthanum cobaltites La0.4Ba0.6CoO3– δ and La0.6Sr0.4CoO3– δ . J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 5246–5254.
Zhang K, Ge L, Ran R, et al. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of cation-ordered LnBaCo2O5+ δ as materials of oxygen permeation membranes and cathodes of SOFCs. Acta Mater 2008, 56: 4876–4889.
Jin FJ, Liu XL, Chu XY, et al. Effect of nonequivalent substitution of Pr3+/4+ with Ca2+ in PrBaCoFeO5+ δ as cathodes for IT-SOFC. J Mater Sci 2021, 56: 1147–1161.
Wang YL, Hu BB, Zhu ZY, et al. Electrical conductivity relaxation of Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6− δ –Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 dual-phase composites. J Mater Chem A 2014, 2: 136–143.
Merino NA, Barbero BP, Eloy P, et al. La1− x Ca x CoO3 perovskite-type oxides: Identification of the surface oxygen species by XPS. Appl Surf Sci 2006, 253: 1489–1493.
Liu MF, Gao JF, Liu XQ, et al. High performance of anode supported BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3− δ (BZCY) electrolyte cell for IT-SOFC. Int J Hydrog Energy 2011, 36: 13741–13745.
Dadyburjor DB, Ruckenstein E. Activation energies to characterize ease of removal of various kinds of oxygen from bismuth molybdate. J Catal 1980, 63: 383–388.
Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J Phys Condens Matter 2009, 21: 084204.
Carter EA, Goddard WA III. Early- versus late-transition-metal-oxo bonds: The electronic structure of oxovanadium(1+) and oxoruthenium(1+). J Phys Chem 1988, 92: 2109–2115.
Tao ZT, Fu M, Liu Y, et al. High-performing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with triple-conducting cathode of Pr0.5Ba0.5(Co0.7Fe0.3)O3− δ tailored with W. Int J Hydrog Energy 2022, 47: 1947–1953.
Kreuer KD, Adams S, Münch W, et al. Proton conducting alkaline earth zirconates and titanates for high drain electrochemical applications. Solid State Ion 2001, 145: 295–306.
Kreuer KD. Aspects of the formation and mobility of protonic charge carriers and the stability of perovskite-type oxides. Solid State Ion 1999, 125: 285–302.
Yin YR, Xiao DD, Wu S, et al. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance. SusMat 2023, 3: 697–708.
Shi N, Su F, Huan DM, et al. Performance and DRT analysis of P-SOFCs fabricated using new phase inversion combined tape casting technology. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 19664–19671.
Chen Y, Choi Y, Yoo S, et al. A highly efficient multi-phase catalyst dramatically enhances the rate of oxygen reduction. Joule 2018, 2: 938–949.