AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Grain size refinement of additive manufactured Ce-TZP ceramics by coupled two-step pre-sintering and HIP

Ruoshi ZhaoHongbing YangXintong LiuHezhen LiChang-An WangJing Ma( )Yanhao Dong( )
State Key Lab of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Ce-TZP) has exceptional fracture toughness and flaw tolerance due to facile t‒m phase transformation toughening. However, its wider-range applications are limited by its relatively low strength due to its large grain size and low transformation stress, which results in yield-like failure. Here, we combined additive manufacturing (AM), pressureless two-step sintering, and hot isostatic pressing (HIP), and addressed the challenging grain size refinement problem in Ce-TZPs. We successfully produced dense ultrafine-grained Ce-TZP ceramics with an average grain size below 500 nm, a three-point bending strength above 800 MPa, and a single-edge-notch-beam fracture toughness in the range of 11‒12 MPa·m1/2. The critical roles of processing design, mixed Ce valences, and under- vs. over-stabilization of tetragonal polymorphs were noted. Our work offers insights and strategies for the future development of stronger and tougher Ce-TZP ceramics that can compete with tetragonal yttria-stabilized zirconia in various applications, including additive manufacturing.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JAC0883_ESM.pdf (1 MB)

References

[1]

Tsukuma K, Shimada M. Strength, fracture toughness and Vickers hardness of CeO2-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystals (Ce-TZP). J Mater Sci 1985, 20: 1178–1184.

[2]

Reyes-Morel PE, Chen IW. Transformation plasticity of CeO2-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: I, stress assistance and autocatalysis. J Am Ceram Soc 1988, 71: 343–353.

[3]

Chevalier J, Liens A, Reveron H, et al. Forty years after the promise of «ceramic steel?»: Zirconia-based composites with a metal-like mechanical behavior. J Am Ceram Soc 2020, 103: 1482–1513.

[4]

Readey MJ, McCallen CL. Microstructure, flaw tolerance, and reliability of Ce-TZP and Y-TZP ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1995, 78: 2769–2776.

[5]

Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradation-aging of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater 2010, 26: 807–820.

[6]

Reyes-Morel PE, Cherng JS, Chen IW. Transformation plasticity of CeO2-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: II, pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect. J Am Ceram Soc 1988, 71: 648–657.

[7]

Lai AL, Du ZH, Gan CL, et al. Shape memory and superelastic ceramics at small scales. Science 2013, 341: 1505–1508.

[8]

Fournier S, Chevalier J, Baeza GP, et al. Ceria-stabilized zirconia-based composites printed by stereolithography: Impact of the processing method on the ductile behaviour and its transformation features. J Eur Ceram Soc 2023, 43: 2894–2906.

[9]

Apel E, Ritzberger C, Courtois N, et al. Introduction to a tough, strong and stable Ce-TZP/MgAl2O4 composite for biomedical applications. J Eur Ceram Soc 2012, 32: 2697–2703.

[10]

Li HZ, Song L, Sun JL, et al. Dental ceramic prostheses by stereolithography-based additive manufacturing: Potentials and challenges. Adv Appl Ceram 2018, 118: 30–36.

[11]

Li HZ, Song L, Sun J, et al. Asynchronous densification of zirconia ceramics formed by stereolithographic additive manufacturing. J Eur Ceram Soc 2021, 41: 4666–4670.

[12]

Chen Z, Sun XH, Shang YP, et al. Dense ceramics with complex shape fabricated by 3D printing: A review. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 195–218.

[13]

Swain MV, Rose LRF. Strength limitations of transformation-toughened zirconia alloys. J Am Ceram Soc 1986, 69: 511–518.

[14]

Yashima M, Hirose T, Katano S, et al. Structural changes of ZrO2–CeO2 solid solutions around the monoclinic–tetragonal phase boundary. Phys Rev B 1995, 51: 8018–8025.

[15]

Chen IW, Chiao YH. Martensitic nucleation in ZrO2. Acta Metall 1983, 31: 1627–1638.

[16]

Theunissen GSAM, Winnubst AJA, Burggraaf AJ. Effect of dopants on the sintering behaviour and stability of tetragonal zirconia ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 1992, 9: 251–263.

[17]

Boutz MMR, Winnubst AJA, Burggraaf AJ. Yttria–ceria stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: Sintering, grain growth and grain boundary segregation. J Eur Ceram Soc 1994, 13: 89–102.

[18]

Matsui K, Horikoshi H, Ohmichi N, et al. Cubic-formation and grain-growth mechanisms in tetragonal zirconia polycrystal. J Am Ceram Soc 2003, 86: 1401–1408.

[19]

Matsui K, Yoshida H, Ikuhara Y. Grain-boundary structure and phase-transformation mechanism in yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal. Mater Sci Forum 2007, 558–559: 921–926.

[20]

Zhu HY, Hirata T, Muramatsu Y. Phase separation in 12 mol% ceria-doped zirconia induced by heat treatment in H2 and Ar. J Am Ceram Soc 1992, 75: 2843–2848.

[21]

Huang SG, Li L, Vleugels J, et al. Thermodynamic prediction of the nonstoichiometric phase Zr1– z Ce z O2– x in the ZrO2–CeO1.5–CeO2 system. J Eur Ceram Soc 2003, 23: 99–106.

[22]

Huang S, Li L, Van der Biest O, et al. Influence of the oxygen partial pressure on the reduction of CeO2 and CeO2–ZrO2 ceramics. Solid State Sci 2005, 7: 539–544.

[23]

Sanjuán ML, Oliete PB, Várez A, et al. The role of Ce reduction in the segregation of metastable phases in the ZrO2–CeO2 system. J Eur Ceram Soc 2012, 32: 689–696.

[24]

Spusta T, Svoboda J, Maca K. Study of pore closure during pressure-less sintering of advanced oxide ceramics. Acta Mater 2016, 115: 347–353.

[25]

Spusta T, Prajzler V, Maca K. Grain growth during capsule-free hot isostatic pressing. Ceram Int 2022, 48: 25764–25771.

[26]

Zhao RS, Liu XT, Li HZ, et al. Stronger and tougher nanosized dense ceria-doped tetragonal zirconia polycrystals by sinter-HIP. J Eur Ceram Soc 2023, 43: 2282–2288.

[27]

Zhang W, Bao JX, Jia GX, et al. The effect of microstructure control on mechanical properties of 12Ce-TZP via two-step sintering method. J Alloys Compd 2017, 711: 686–692.

[28]

Vidor GF, Kern F. Microstructure, mechanical properties and aging resistance of 12Ce-TZP reinforced with alumina and in situ formed manganese cerium hexaaluminate precipitates. J Eur Ceram Soc 2023, 43: 2864–2874.

[29]

Guo WM, Zeng LY, Wu LX, et al. Effect of CeO2 and Al2O3 contents on Ce-ZrO2/Al2O3 composites. J Am Ceram Soc 2018, 101: 2066–2073.

[30]

Touaiher I, Saâdaoui M, Chevalier J, et al. Fracture behavior of Ce-TZP/alumina/aluminate composites with different amounts of transformation toughening. Influence of the testing methods. J Eur Ceram Soc 2018, 38: 1778–1789.

[31]

Liens A, Reveron H, Douillard T, et al. Phase transformation induces plasticity with negligible damage in ceria-stabilized zirconia-based ceramics. Acta Mater 2020, 183: 261–273.

[32]

Chen IW, Wang XH. Sintering dense nanocrystalline ceramics without final-stage grain growth. Nature 2000, 404: 168–171.

[33]

Wang XH, Chen PL, Chen IW. Two-step sintering of ceramics with constant grain-size, I. Y2O3 J Am Ceram Soc 2006, 89: 431–437.

[34]

Dong YH, Chen IW. Mobility transition at grain boundaries in two-step sintered 8 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 2018, 101: 1857–1869.

[35]

Dong YH, Yang HB, Zhang L, et al. Ultra-uniform nanocrystalline materials via two-step sintering. Adv Funct Mater 2021, 31: 2007750.

[36]

Maca K, Pouchly V, Zalud P. Two-Step Sintering of oxide ceramics with various crystal structures. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010, 30: 583–589.

[37]

Lóh NJ, Simão L, Faller CA, et al. A review of two-step sintering for ceramics. Ceram Int 2016, 42: 12556–12572.

[38]

Mazaheri M, Simchi A, Golestani-Fard F. Densification and grain growth of nanocrystalline 3Y-TZP during two-step sintering. J Eur Ceram Soc 2008, 28: 2933–2939.

[39]

Matsuzawa M, Abe M, Horibe S, et al. The effect of reduction on the mechanical properties of CeO2 doped tetragonal zirconia ceramics. Acta Mater 2004, 52: 1675–1682.

[40]

Huang SG, Vanmeensel K, Van der Biest O, et al. Influence of CeO2 reduction on the microstructure and mechanical properties of pulsed electric current sintered Y2O3–CeO2 co-stabilized ZrO2 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2007, 90: 1420–1426.

[41]

Romeo M, Bak K, El Fallah J, et al. XPS study of the reduction of cerium dioxide. Surf Interface Anal 1993, 20: 508–512.

[42]

Zeng Z, Liu YZ, Qian F, et al. Role of a low level of La2O3 dopant on the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation of ceria–yttria co-stabilized zirconia. J Eur Ceram Soc 2019, 39: 4338–4346.

[43]

Sarma DD, Rao CNR. XPES studies of oxides of second- and third-row transition metals including rare earths. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 1980, 20: 25–45.

[44]

Dong YH, Qi L, Li J, et al. A computational study of yttria-stabilized zirconia: II. Cation diffusion. Acta Mater 2017, 126: 438–450.

[45]

Dong YH, Qi L, Alvarez A, et al. Enhanced mobility of cations and anions in the redox state: The polaronium mechanism. Acta Mater 2022, 232: 117941.

[46]

Dong YH. Redox enhanced slow ion kinetics in oxide ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2024, 107: 1905–1916.

[47]

Hannnink RHJ, Swain MV. Metastability of the martensitic transformation in a 12 mol% ceria–zirconia alloy: I, deformation and fracture observations. J Am Ceram Soc 1989, 72: 90–98.

[48]

Rauchs G, Fett T, Munz D, et al. Tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in CeO2-stabilised zirconia under uniaxial loading. J Eur Ceram Soc 2001, 21: 2229–2241.

[49]

Li P, Chen IW, Penner-Hahn JE. Effect of dopants on zirconia stabilization—An X-ray absorption study: II, tetravalent dopants. J Am Ceram Soc 1994, 77: 1281–1288.

[50]

Yu CS, Shetty DK. Transformation zone shape, size, and crack-growth-resistance [ R-curve] behavior of ceria-partially-stabilized zirconia polycrystals. J Am Ceram Soc 1989, 72: 921–928.

[51]

Becher PF, Swain MV. Grain-size-dependent transformation behavior in polycrystalline tetragonal zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 1992, 75: 493–502.

[52]

Heuer AH, Claussen N, Kriven WM, et al. Stability of tetragonal ZrO2 particles in ceramic matrices. J Am Ceram Soc 1982, 65: 642–650.

[53]

Casselton REW. Electrical conductivity of ceria-stabilized zirconia. Phys Status Solidi A 1970, 1: 787–794.

[54]

Reidy R, Simkovich G. Electrical conductivity and point defect behavior in ceria-stabilized zirconia. Solid State Ionics 1993, 62: 85–97.

Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 621-629
Cite this article:
Zhao R, Yang H, Liu X, et al. Grain size refinement of additive manufactured Ce-TZP ceramics by coupled two-step pre-sintering and HIP. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2024, 13(5): 621-629. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2024.9220883

1259

Views

368

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 09 January 2024
Revised: 20 March 2024
Accepted: 21 March 2024
Published: 21 May 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return