AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (14.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Optimization of microstructure design for enhanced sensing performance in flexible piezoresistive sensors

Xinghao Fan1,Hailong Hu2,Bin Liao1Yaqi Zhang2Fan Zhang1( )
School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Research Institute of Aerospace Technology, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Xinghao Fan and Hailong Hu contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Flexible piezoresistive strain sensors have received significant attention due to their diverse applications in monitoring human activities and health, as well as in robotics, prosthetics, and human–computer interaction interfaces. Among the various flexible sensor types, those with microstructure designs are considered promising for strain sensing due to their simple structure, high sensitivity, extensive operational range, rapid response time, and robust stability. This review provides a concise overview of recent advancements in flexible piezoresistive sensors based on microstructure design for enhanced strain sensing performance, including the impact of microstructure on sensing mechanisms, classification of microstructure designs, fabrication methods, and practical applications. Initially, this review delves into the analysis of piezoresistive sensor sensing mechanisms and performance parameters, exploring the relationship between microstructure design and performance enhancement. Subsequently, an in-depth discussion is presented, focusing on the primary themes of microstructure design classification, process selection, performance characteristics, and specific applications. This review employs mathematical modeling and hierarchical analysis to emphasize the directionality of different microstructures on performance enhancement and to highlight the performance advantages and applicable features of various microstructure types. In conclusion, this review examines the multifunctionality of flexible piezoresistive sensors based on microstructure design and addresses the challenges that still need to be overcome and improved, such as achieving a wide range of stretchability, high sensitivity, and robust stability. This review summarizes the research directions for enhancing sensing performance through microstructure design, aiming to assist in the advancement of flexible piezoresistive sensors.

References

[1]

Bae GY, Pak SW, Kim D, et al. Linearly and highly pressure-sensitive electronic skin based on a bioinspired hierarchical structural array. Adv Mater 2016, 28: 5300–5306.

[2]

Schwartz G, Tee BCK, Mei JG, et al. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Nat Commun 2013, 4: 1859.

[3]

Chen S, Song YJ, Xu F. Flexible and highly sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on carbonized crepe paper with corrugated structure. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2018, 10: 34646–34654.

[4]

Pang C, Koo JH, Nguyen A, et al. Highly skin-conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. Adv Mater 2015, 27: 634–640.

[5]

Jeong Y, Kim J, Xie ZQ, et al. A skin-attachable, stretchable integrated system based on liquid GaInSn for wireless human motion monitoring with multi-site sensing capabilities. npj Asia Mater 2017, 9: e443.

[6]

Boutry CM, Beker L, Kaizawa Y, et al. Biodegradable and flexible arterial-pulse sensor for the wireless monitoring of blood flow. Nat Biomed Eng 2019, 3: 47–57.

[7]

Wang YL, Zhu W, Deng Y, et al. Self-powered wearable pressure sensing system for continuous healthcare monitoring enabled by flexible thin-film thermoelectric generator. Nano Energy 2020, 73: 104773.

[8]

Bartolozzi C, Natale L, Nori F, et al. Robots with a sense of touch. Nat Mater 2016, 15: 921–925.

[9]

Wang HB, Totaro M, Beccai L. Toward perceptive soft robots: Progress and challenges. Adv Sci 2018, 5: 1800541.

[10]

Raspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Petrini FM, et al. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci Transl Med 2014, 6: 222ra19.

[11]

Dos Santos A, Pinela N, Alves P, et al. E-skin bimodal sensors for robotics and prosthesis using PDMS molds engraved by laser. Sensors 2019, 19: 899.

[12]

Boutry CM, Negre M, Jorda M, et al. A hierarchically patterned, bioinspired E-skin able to detect the direction of applied pressure for robotics. Sci Robot 2018, 3: eaau6914.

[13]

Sim K, Rao ZL, Kim HJ, et al. Fully rubbery integrated electronics from high effective mobility intrinsically stretchable semiconductors. Sci Adv 2019, 5: eaav5749.

[14]

Araromi OA, Graule MA, Dorsey KL, et al. Ultra-sensitive and resilient compliant strain gauges for soft machines. Nature 2020, 587: 219–224.

[15]

Yin R, Wang DP, Zhao SF, et al. Wearable sensors-enabled human–machine interaction systems: From design to application. Adv Funct Mater 2020, 31: 2008936.

[16]

Tsai YJ, Wang CM, Chang TS, et al. Multilayered Ag NP–PEDOT–paper composite device for human–machine interfacing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019, 11: 10380–10388.

[17]

Jung S, Kim JH, Kim J, et al. Reverse-micelle-induced porous pressure-sensitive rubber for wearable human−machine interfaces. Adv Mater 2014, 26: 4825–4830.

[18]

Liao XQ, Wang WS, Wang L, et al. A highly stretchable and deformation-insensitive bionic electronic exteroceptive neural sensor for human‒machine interfaces. Nano Energy 2021, 80: 105548.

[19]

Jung M, Vishwanath SK, Kim J, et al. Transparent and flexible mayan-pyramid-based pressure sensor using facile-transferred indium tin oxide for bimodal sensor applications. Sci Rep 2019, 9: 14040.

[20]

Wang T, Qi DP, Yang H, et al. Tactile chemomechanical transduction based on an elastic microstructured array to enhance the sensitivity of portable biosensors. Adv Mater 2019, 31: e1803883.

[21]

Shang C, Xu QH, Liang NM, et al. Multi-parameter e-skin based on biomimetic mechanoreceptors and stress field sensing. npj Flex Electron 2023, 7: 19.

[22]

Kamat AM, Pei YT, Jayawardhana B, et al. Biomimetic soft polymer microstructures and piezoresistive graphene MEMS sensors using sacrificial metal 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2021, 13: 1094–1104.

[23]

Park J, Lee Y, Hong J, et al. Tactile-direction-sensitive and stretchable electronic skins based on human-skin-inspired interlocked microstructures. ACS Nano 2014, 8: 12020–12029.

[24]

Yu SX, Li LL, Wang JJ, et al. Light‐boosting highly sensitive pressure sensors based on bioinspired multiscale surface structures. Adv Funct Mater 2020, 30: 1907091.

[25]

Pan LJ, Chortos A, Yu GH, et al. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nat Commun 2014, 5: 3002.

[26]

Hu HL, Ma YL, Yue JL, et al. Porous GNP/PDMS composites with significantly reduced percolation threshold of conductive filler for stretchable strain sensors. Compos Commun 2022, 29: 101033.

[27]

Zhang F, Hu HL, Hu SM, et al. Significant strain-rate dependence of sensing behavior in TiO2@carbon fibre/PDMS composites for flexible strain sensors. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1350–1359.

[28]

Mannsfeld SCB, Tee BCK, Stoltenberg RM, et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat Mater 2010, 9: 859–864.

[29]

Alamusi, Hu N, Fukunaga H, et al. Piezoresistive strain sensors made from carbon nanotubes based polymer nanocomposites. Sensors 2011, 11: 10691–10723.

[30]

Zeng X, Liu Y, Liu F, et al. A bioinspired three-dimensional integrated e-skin for multiple mechanical stimuli recognition. Nano Energy 2022, 92: 106777.

[31]

Georgopoulou A, Michel S, Clemens F. Sensorized robotic skin based on piezoresistive sensor fiber composites produced with injection molding of liquid silicone. Polymers 2021, 13: 1226.

[32]

Kim J, Lee M, Shim HJ, et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat Commun 2014, 5: 5747.

[33]

Wu YC, Karakurt I, Beker L, et al. Piezoresistive stretchable strain sensors with human machine interface demonstrations. Sensor Actuat A—Phys 2018, 279: 46–52.

[34]

Yang T, Deng WL, Chu X, et al. Hierarchically microstructure-bioinspired flexible piezoresistive bioelectronics. ACS Nano 2021, 15: 11555–11563.

[35]

Zhang ZM, Zhang YX, Jiang X, et al. Simple and efficient pressure sensor based on PDMS wrapped CNT arrays. Carbon 2019, 155: 71–76.

[36]

Gao YJ, Ota H, Schaler EW, et al. Wearable microfluidic diaphragm pressure sensor for health and tactile touch monitoring. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1701985.

[37]

Kim G, Cho S, Chang K, et al. Spatially pressure-mapped thermochromic interactive sensor. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1606120.

[38]

Zheng MY, Li WY, Xu MJ, et al. Strain sensors based on chromium nanoparticle arrays. Nanoscale 2014, 6: 3930–3933.

[39]

Huang CB, Witomska S, Aliprandi A, et al. Molecule-graphene hybrid materials with tunable mechanoresponse: Highly sensitive pressure sensors for health monitoring. Adv Mater 2019, 31: e1804600.

[40]

Zhao YX, Song JG, Ryu GH, et al. Low-temperature synthesis of 2D MoS2 on a plastic substrate for a flexible gas sensor. Nanoscale 2018, 10: 9338–9345.

[41]

Htwe YZ, Chow WS, Suriati G, et al. Properties enhancement of graphene and chemical reduction silver nanoparticles conductive inks printed on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) substrate. Synthetic Met 2019, 256: 116120.

[42]

Vuorinen T, Niittynen J, Kankkunen T, et al. Inkjet-printed graphene/PEDOT:PSS temperature sensors on a skin-conformable polyurethane substrate. Sci Rep 2016, 6: 35289.

[43]

Hassan G, Khan MU, Bae J, et al. Inkjet printed self-healable strain sensor based on graphene and magnetic iron oxide nano-composite on engineered polyurethane substrate. Sci Rep 2020, 10: 18234.

[44]

Liu T, Liu MM, Dou S, et al. Triboelectric-nanogenerator-based soft energy-harvesting skin enabled by toughly bonded elastomer/hydrogel hybrids. ACS Nano 2018, 12: 2818–2826.

[45]

Yeo WH, Kim YS, Lee J, et al. Multifunctional epidermal electronics printed directly onto the skin. Adv Mater 2013, 25: 2773–2778.

[46]

Zhang F, Hu HL, Islam M, et al. Multimodal strain and temperature sensor by hybridizing reduced graphene oxide and PEDOT:PSS. Compos Sci Technol 2020, 187: 107959.

[47]
Atitallah BB, Rajendran D, Hu Z, et al. Piezo-resistive pressure and strain sensors for biomedical and tele-manipulation applications. In: Advanced Sensors for Biomedical Applications. Kanoun O, Derbel N, Eds. Berlin (Germany): Springer Nature, 2021, 38: 47–65.
[48]

Yang H, Yuan L, Yao XF, et al. Piezoresistive response of graphene rubber composites considering the tunneling effect. J Mech Phys Solids 2020, 139: 103943.

[49]

Amjadi M, Pichitpajongkit A, Lee SJ, et al. Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire-elastomer nanocomposite. ACS Nano 2014, 8: 5154–5163.

[50]

Park B, Kim J, Kang D, et al. Dramatically enhanced mechanosensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio of nanoscale crack-based sensors: Effect of crack depth. Adv Mater 2016, 28: 8130–8137.

[51]

Zhou YJ, Zhan PF, Ren MN, et al. Significant stretchability enhancement of a crack-based strain sensor combined with high sensitivity and superior durability for motion monitoring. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2019, 11: 7405–7414.

[52]

Wang MY, Gurunathan R, Imasato K, et al. A percolation model for piezoresistivity in conductor–polymer composites. Adv Theor Simul 2019, 2: 1800125.

[53]

Su FC, Huang HX. Flexible switching pressure sensors with fast response and less bending-sensitive performance applied to pain-perception-mimetic gloves. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2023, 15: 56328–56336.

[54]
Feng Y. Fabrication and performance of piezoresistive flexible pressure sensors with different structures based on SWCNT and cross-finger electrodes. M.S. Thesis. Xi’an (China): Northwestern University, 2022. (in Chinese)
[55]

Hamedi M, Atashparva M. A review of electrical contact resistance modeling in resistance spot welding. Weld World 2017, 61: 269–290.

[56]

Gao L, Zhu CX, Li L, et al. All paper-based flexible and wearable piezoresistive pressure sensor. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2019, 11: 25034–25042.

[57]

Huang Y, Fan X, Chen SC, et al. Emerging technologies of flexible pressure sensors: Materials, modeling, devices, and manufacturing. Adv Funct Mater 2019, 29: 1808509.

[58]

Hu HL Ma YL, Zhang F, et al. Progress on piezoresistive strain sensors for flexible nanocomposites. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica 2022, 39: 1–22. (in Chinese)

[59]

Cohen DJ, Mitra D, Peterson K, et al. A highly elastic, capacitive strain gauge based on percolating nanotube networks. Nano Lett 2012, 12: 1821–1825.

[60]

Kong J, Jang NS, Kim S, et al. Simple and rapid micropatterning of conductive carbon composites and its application to elastic strain sensors. Carbon 2014, 77: 199–207.

[61]

Kramer RK, Majidi C, Wood RJ. Masked deposition of gallium–indium alloys for liquid-embedded elastomer conductors. Adv Funct Mater 2013, 23: 5292–5296.

[62]
Zhao L. Fabrication and sensing properties of microstructured inverted pyramid on flexible conductive composites surfaces. M.S. Thesis. Guangzhou (China): South China University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
[63]

Choong CL, Shim MB, Lee BS, et al. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv Mater 2014, 26: 3451–3458.

[64]

Hou LJ, Qin HB, Hu WW, et al. Flexible pressure sensor design and fabrication based on micro-nano structure. Trans Microsyst Technol 2022, 41: 73–76. (in Chinese)

[65]

Zhao DY, Nie BB, Qi GC, et al. Metal film flexible strain sensor based on microstructure. Micronanoelectronic Technol 2022, 59: 1049–1057. (in Chinese)

[66]
Li CY. Flexible wearable pressure sensor based on microstructure. M.S. Thesis. Hefei (China): University of Science and Technology of China, 2021. (in Chinese)
[67]

Park J, Lee Y, Hong J, et al. Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multimodal electronic skins. ACS Nano 2014, 8: 4689–4697.

[68]

Wei B, Chen G, Wang QW. A high-performance flexible piezoresistive sensor based on a nanocellulose/carbon-nanotube/polyvinyl-alcohol composite with a wrinkled microstructure. IEEE Sens J 2022, 22: 15834–15843.

[69]

Yan JF, Ma YN, Li XX, et al. Flexible and high sensitivity piezoresistive sensor based on mxene composite with wrinkle structure. Ceram Int 2020, 46: 23592–23598.

[70]

Li YM, Hou XJ, Zhang LY, et al. Graphene/PDMS biomimetic ginkgo leaf microstructure flexible piezoresistive pressure sensor. Micronanoelectronic Technol 2020, 57: 198–203. (in Chinese)

[71]
Ma JX. Design and performance study of bionic microstructure flexible piezoresistive sensor. M.S. Thesis. Hangzhou (China): Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2022. (in Chinese)
[72]

Tang H, Nie P, Wang RR, et al. Piezoresistive electronic skin based on diverse bionic microstructure. Sensor Actuat A—Phys 2021, 318: 112532.

[73]

Nie P, Wang RR, Xu XJ, et al. High-performance piezoresistive electronic skin with bionic hierarchical microstructure and microcracks. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2017, 9: 14911–14919.

[74]

Cheng YF, Ma YN, Li LY, et al. Bioinspired microspines for a high-performance spray Ti3C2T x MXene-based piezoresistive sensor. ACS Nano 2020, 14: 2145–2155.

[75]

Liu HW, Li YZ, Zhou MN, et al. Ambilateral convergent directional freeze casting meta-structured foams with a negative Poisson’s ratio for high-performance piezoresistive sensors. Chem Eng J 2023, 454: 140436.

[76]

Du C, Zhang Y, Zhang DZ, et al. An in situ polymerized polypyrrole/halloysite nanotube–silver nanoflower based flexible wearable pressure sensor with a large measurement range and high sensitivity. J Mater Chem C 2021, 9: 13172–13181.

[77]

Luo NQ, Huang Y, Liu J, et al. Hollow-structured graphene-silicone-composite-based piezoresistive sensors: Decoupled property tuning and bending reliability. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1702675.

[78]

Lv LX, Zhang PP, Xu T, et al. Ultrasensitive pressure sensor based on an ultralight sparkling graphene block. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2017, 9: 22885–22892.

[79]

Xiao JL, Tan YQ, Song YH, et al. A flyweight and superelastic graphene aerogel as a high-capacity adsorbent and highly sensitive pressure sensor. J Mater Chem A 2018, 6: 9074–9080.

[80]

Dahiya RS, Metta G, Valle M, et al. Tactile sensing—From humans to humanoids. IEEE Trans Robot 2010, 26: 1–20.

[81]

Eltaib MEH, Hewit JR. Tactile sensing technology for minimal access surgery—A review. Mechatronics 2003, 13: 1163–1177.

[82]

Sakieva BO. Practice and application of hierarchical analysis. Theoret Appl Sci 2019, 80: 544–549.

[83]

Ge G, Cai YC, Dong QC, et al. A flexible pressure sensor based on rGO/polyaniline wrapped sponge with tunable sensitivity for human motion detection. Nanoscale 2018, 10: 10033–10040.

[84]

Wang ZH, Zhang L, Liu J, et al. Flexible hemispheric microarrays of highly pressure-sensitive sensors based on breath figure method. Nanoscale 2018, 10: 10691–10698.

[85]

Fu YJ, Qui HZ, Liao KS, et al. Effect of UV-ozone treatment on poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes: Surface characterization and gas separation performance. Langmuir 2010, 26: 4392–4399.

[86]

Yu GH, Hu JD, Tan JP, et al. A wearable pressure sensor based on ultra-violet/ozone microstructured carbon nanotube/polydimethylsiloxane arrays for electronic skins. Nanotechnology 2018, 29: 115502.

[87]

Chen WF, Wang BW, Zhu QB, et al. Flexible pressure sensors with a wide detection range based on self-assembled polystyrene microspheres. Sensors 2019, 19: 5194.

[88]

Xu MD, Gao Y, Yu GH, et al. Flexible pressure sensor using carbon nanotube-wrapped polydimethylsiloxane microspheres for tactile sensing. Sensor Actuat A—Phys 2018, 284: 260–265.

[89]

Roh E, Lee HB, Kim D, et al. A solution-processable, omnidirectionally stretchable, and high-pressure-sensitive piezoresistive device. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1703004.

[90]

Tian Q, Yan WR, Li YQ, et al. Bean pod-inspired ultrasensitive and self-healing pressure sensor based on laser-induced graphene and polystyrene microsphere sandwiched structure. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2020, 12: 9710–9717.

[91]

Zhu BW, Niu ZQ, Wang H, et al. Microstructured graphene arrays for highly sensitive flexible tactile sensors. Small 2014, 10: 3625–3631.

[92]

Smith A, Mofidian SMM, Bardaweel H. Three-dimensional printed embedded channel-based resistive strain sensor: Fabrication and experimental characterization. J Intel Mat Syst Str 2019, 30: 1518–1526.

[93]

Zhang T, Li ZY, Li K, et al. Flexible pressure sensors with wide linearity range and high sensitivity based on selective laser sintering 3D printing. Adv Mater Technol-US 2019, 4: 1900679.

[94]

Dirkzwager RM, Liang S, Tanner JA. Development of aptamer-based point-of-care diagnostic devices for malaria using three-dimensional printing rapid prototyping. ACS Sens 2016, 1: 420–426.

[95]

Yin XY, Zhang Y, Xiao JF, et al. Monolithic dual-material 3D printing of ionic skins with long‐term performance stability. Adv Funct Mater 2019, 29: 1904716.

[96]

Zhou LY, Fu JZ, Gao Q, et al. All-printed flexible and stretchable electronics with pressing or freezing activatable liquid-metal-silicone inks. Adv Funct Mater 2020, 30: 1906683.

[97]

Peng SH, Blanloeuil P, Wu SY, et al. Rational design of ultrasensitive pressure sensors by tailoring microscopic features. Adv Mater Interfaces 2018, 5: 1800403.

[98]

Dos Santos A, Pinela N, Alves P, et al. Piezoresistive E-skin sensors produced with laser engraved molds. Adv Electron Mater 2018, 4: 1800182.

[99]

Yang ZY, Li HK, Niu G, et al. Poly(vinylalcohol)/chitosan-based high-strength, fire-retardant and smoke-suppressant composite aerogels incorporating aluminum species via freeze drying. Compos Part B Eng 2021, 219: 108919.

[100]

Zhang XM, Zhang L, He XY, et al. Fabrication and application of new polymer-based materials by freeze-drying. Prog Chem 2014, 26: 1832–1839.

[101]

Ma YN, Yue Y, Zhang H, et al. 3D synergistical MXene/reduced graphene oxide aerogel for a piezoresistive sensor. ACS Nano 2018, 12: 3209–3216.

[102]

Wang S, Wang CY, Zhao YF, et al. Flexible pressure sensors with ultrahigh stress tolerance enabled by periodic microslits. Microsyst Nanoeng 2024, 10: 24.

Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 711-728
Cite this article:
Fan X, Hu H, Liao B, et al. Optimization of microstructure design for enhanced sensing performance in flexible piezoresistive sensors. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2024, 13(6): 711-728. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2024.9220897

1183

Views

391

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 22 February 2024
Revised: 05 April 2024
Accepted: 10 April 2024
Published: 29 June 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return