AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (12 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Nb-doped PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O6-based perovskite cathode with improved oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability for solid oxide fuel cells

Depeng ZengFeng ZhuKang XuHua ZhangYangsen XuYu Chen( )
School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The performance of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is strongly associated with the activity and durability of the cathode, where the oxygen reduction reaction occurs. In this study, we report our findings in the development of an Nb-doped PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O6−δ (PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2−xNbxO6−δ, x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, and 0.1, denoted as PBCCNx) perovskite composite as the SOFC cathode. Analyses of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and energy-dispersive transmission electron microscopy (TEM-EDS) images suggest that after being treated at 950 °C in air, PBCCN0.05 mainly contains phases of Ca- and Nb-doped PrBaCo2O6−δ double perovskite, PrCoO3 perovskite with Ca and Nb doping, and Ba3Ca1.18Nb1.82O9−δ. When evaluated as an SOFC cathode, the PBCCN0.05 mixture has shown a low polarization resistance of 0.0074 Ω∙cm2 at 800 °C in La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3 electrolyte symmetrical cells. Accordingly, anode-supported single cells with a configuration of Ni–Zr0.84Y0.16O2−δ (YSZ)/YSZ/Gd0.1Ce0.9O2−δ/PBCCN0.05 display high electrochemical performance, with a peak power density of 1.81 W∙cm−2 and a reasonable durability of 100 h at 800 °C. PBCCN0.05 possesses a higher concentration of oxygen vacancies, a faster oxygen surface adsorption‒dissociation rate, and an increased mass ratio of PrCoO3 perovskite with Ca and Nb doping compared to PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O6−δ without Nb doping.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JAC0959_ESM.pdf (270.6 KB)

References

[1]
Bian WJ, Wu W, Wang BM, et al. Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch. Nature 2022, 604 : 479–485.
[2]

Yu YF, You QL, Zuo ZY, et al. Compound climate extremes in China: Trends, causes, and projections. Atmos Res 2023, 286: 106675.

[3]

Bolan S, Padhye LP, Jasemizad T, et al. Impacts of climate change on the fate of contaminants through extreme weather events. Sci Total Environ 2024, 909: 168388.

[4]

Aguir Bargaoui S, Nouri FZ. History of the human and nature relationship, discovery of greenhouse effect and awareness of the environmental problem. J Tecon Sci Res 2021, 4: 23–34.

[5]
Ranta A, Kang J, Saad A, et al. Climate change and stroke: A topical narrative review. Stroke 2024, 55 : 1118–1128.
[6]

Jackson RB, Friedlingstein P, Le Quéré C, et al. Global fossil carbon emissions rebound near pre-COVID-19 levels. Environ Res Lett 2022, 17: 031001.

[7]

Vohra K, Vodonos A, Schwartz J, et al. Global mortality from outdoor fine particle pollution generated by fossil fuel combustion: Results from GEOS-Chem. Environ Res 2021, 195: 110754.

[8]

Sharma V, Tsai ML, Nargotra P, et al. Journey of lignin from a roadblock to bridge for lignocellulose biorefineries: A comprehensive review. Sci Total Environ 2023, 861: 160560.

[9]

Sirohi R, Vivekanand V, Pandey AK, et al. Emerging trends in role and significance of biochar in gaseous biofuels production. Environ Technol Innov 2023, 30: 103100.

[10]

Sharma VK, Singh R, Gehlot A, et al. Imperative role of photovoltaic and concentrating solar power technologies towards renewable energy generation. Int J Photoenergy 2022, 2022: 3852484.

[11]

Roga S, Bardhan S, Kumar Y, et al. Recent technology and challenges of wind energy generation: A review. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2022, 52: 102239.

[12]

Li G, Zhu WD. Tidal current energy harvesting technologies: A review of current status and life cycle assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2023, 179: 113269.

[13]

Hauch A, Ploner A, Pylypko S, et al. Test and characterization of reversible solid oxide cells and stacks for innovative renewable energy storage. Fuel Cells 2021, 21: 467–476.

[14]

Agbaje MA, Akkaya AV. Electrochemical-energy- exergy analysis of reversible solid oxide cell-based small-scale stand-alone energy storage system. Case Stud Therm Eng 2023, 52: 103732.

[15]

Aicart J, Di Iorio S, Petitjean M, et al. Transition cycles during operation of a reversible solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cell (rSOC) system. Fuel Cells 2019, 19: 381–388.

[16]

Choudhury A, Chandra H, Arora A. Application of solid oxide fuel cell technology for power generation—A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013, 20: 430–442.

[17]

Akikur RK, Saidur R, Ping HW, et al. Performance analysis of a co-generation system using solar energy and SOFC technology. Energy Convers Manage 2014, 79: 415–430.

[18]

Ndubuisi A, Abouali S, Singh K, et al. Recent advances, practical challenges, and perspectives of intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 2196–2227.

[19]

Jun A, Kim J, Shin J, et al. Perovskite as a cathode material: A review of its role in solid-oxide fuel cell technology. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3: 511–530.

[20]

Li ZH, Li MR, Zhu ZH. Perovskite cathode materials for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: Fundamentals to optimization. Electrochem Energy Rev 2022, 5: 263–311.

[21]

Sunarso J, Hashim SS, Zhu N, et al. Perovskite oxides applications in high temperature oxygen separation, solid oxide fuel cell and membrane reactor: A review. Prog EnergCombust 2017, 61: 57–77.

[22]

Tarutin AP, Filonova EA, Ricote S, et al. Chemical design of oxygen electrodes for solid oxide electrochemical cells: A guide. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2023, 57: 103185.

[23]

Jiang SP. Development of lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite perovskite electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells−A review. Int J Hydrog Energ 2019, 44: 7448–7493.

[24]

Yu H, Kim SG, Im HN, et al. Uniform and scalable Sm3+ and Nd3+ doped ceria nanocatalysts decorating bifunctional oxygen electrodes for high performing reversible solid oxide electrochemical cells. Chem Eng J 2023, 475: 146002.

[25]
Jia W, Wang Y, Huang J, et al. Alternative B-site-doped La0. 6Sr0. 4Co0. 2Fe0.8− xM xO3 (M = Ni, Cu, Nb; x = 0, 0.1, 0.2) as innovative cathode material for LT-SOFC with enhanced charge transfer and oxygen ion diffusion. Appl Energ 2024, 353 : 122096.
[26]

Zhou W, Ran R, Shao ZP. Progress in understanding and development of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− δ -based cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells: A review. J Power Sources 2009, 192: 231–246.

[27]

Sahini MG, Mwankemwa BS, Kanas N. Ba x Sr1- x Co y Fe1- y O3- δ (BSCF) mixed ionic-electronic conducting (MIEC) materials for oxygen separation membrane and SOFC applications: Insights into processing, stability, and functional properties. Ceram Int 2022, 48: 2948–2964.

[28]

Sun SC, Cheng Z. Effects of H2O and CO2 on electrochemical behaviors of BSCF cathode for proton conducting IT-SOFC. J Electrochem Soc 2016, 164: F81–F88.

[29]

Zhu L, Wei B, Lü Z, et al. Performance degradation of double-perovskite PrBaCo2O5+ δ oxygen electrode in CO2 containing atmospheres. Appl Surf Sci 2017, 416: 649–655.

[30]

Kim G, Wang S, Jacobson AJ, et al. Rapid oxygen ion diffusion and surface exchange kinetics in PrBaCo2O5+ x with a perovskite related structure and ordered A cations. J Mater Chem 2007, 17: 2500–2505.

[31]

Hu T, Xu YS, Xu K, et al. Visiting the roles of Sr- or Ca- doping on the oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability of a perovskite cathode for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. SusMat 2023, 3: 91–101.

[32]

Zhu F, He F, Xu K, et al. Enhancing the oxygen reduction reaction activity and durability of a double-perovskite via an A-site tuning. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 3043–3052.

[33]

Xu K, Zhang H, Xu YS, et al. An efficient steam-induced heterostructured air electrode for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Adv Funct Mater 2022, 32: 2110998.

[34]

Xu K, Zhang H, Xu YS, et al. Phase engineering of a donor-doped air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Adv Powder Mater 2024, 3: 100187.

[35]

Jin FJ, Liu XW, Tian YF, et al. Enhancing oxygen reduction activity and CO2 tolerance by a bismuth doping strategy for solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. Adv Funct Mater 2024, 34: 2400519.

[36]

Chen Y, Yoo S, Choi Y, et al. A highly active, CO2-tolerant electrode for the oxygen reduction reaction. Energ Environ Sci 2018, 11: 2458–2466.

[37]

Lim C, Sengodan S, Jeong D, et al. Investigation of the Fe doping effect on the B-site of the layered perovskite PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O5+ δ for a promising cathode material of the intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energ 2019, 44: 1088–1095.

[38]

Zhang Y, Shen LY, Wang YH, et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction kinetics of IT-SOFC cathode with PrBaCo2O5+ δ /Gd0.1Ce1.9O2− δ coherent interface. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 3495–3505.

[39]
Zhou YC, Liu EZ, Chen Y, et al. An active and robust air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett 2021, 6 : 1511–1520.
[40]

Gu HX, Yang GM, Hu Y, et al. Enhancing the oxygen reduction activity of PrBaCo2O5+ δ double perovskite cathode by tailoring the calcination temperatures. Int J Hydrog Energy 2020, 45: 25996–26004.

[41]

Zhang LL, Yao GB, Song ZY, et al. Effects of Pr-deficiency on thermal expansion and electrochemical properties in Pr1− x BaCo2O5+ δ cathodes for IT-SOFCs. Electrochim Acta 2016, 212: 522–534.

[42]

Li M, Li H, Jiang XC, et al. Gd-induced electronic structure engineering of a NiFe-layered double hydroxide for efficient oxygen evolution. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 2999–3006.

[43]

He F, Hou MY, Liu DL, et al. Phase segregation of a composite air electrode unlocks the high performance of reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Energy Environ Sci 2024, 17: 3898–3907.

[44]

Yin YR, Zhou YB, Gu YY, et al. Successful preparation of BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3– δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 587–597.

[45]

Li J, Zhou X, Wu CC, et al. Self-stabilized hybrid cathode for solid oxide fuel cell: A-site deficient perovskite coating as solid solution for strontium diffusion. Chem Eng J 2022, 438: 135446.

[46]

Chen Y, Choi Y, Yoo S, et al. A highly efficient multi-phase catalyst dramatically enhances the rate of oxygen reduction. Joule 2018, 2: 938–949.

[47]

Choi SM, An H, Yoon KJ, et al. Electrochemical analysis of high-performance protonic ceramic fuel cells based on a columnar-structured thin electrolyte. Appl Energ 2019, 233: 29–36.

[48]

Shen LY, Du ZH, Zhang Y, et al. Medium-Entropy perovskites Sr(Fe α Ti β Co γ Mn ζ )O3− δ as promising cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell. Appl Catal B Environ 2021, 295: 120264.

[49]

Zhu F, Xu K, He F, et al. An active and contaminants-tolerant high-entropy electrode for ceramic fuel cells. ACS Energy Lett 2024, 9: 556–567.

[50]

Wang YD, Marchetti B, Zhou XD. Call attention to using DRT and EIS to quantify the contributions of solid oxide cell components to the total impedance. Int J Hydrog Energ 2022, 47: 35437–35448.

Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 1590-1599
Cite this article:
Zeng D, Zhu F, Xu K, et al. Nb-doped PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O6-based perovskite cathode with improved oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability for solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2024, 13(10): 1590-1599. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2024.9220959

523

Views

122

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 21 May 2024
Revised: 25 July 2024
Accepted: 14 August 2024
Published: 04 September 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return