PDF (24.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Research Article | Open Access

Synergistic improvement of the mechanical and biological performance of Si3N4 by incorporating nanostructured graphene

Zhe Zhan1,Bin Deng2,Yanru Chen2Xinghong Zhang3Jinzhu Song1()
School of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Department of Stomatology, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Center for Composite Materials and Structures, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Zhe Zhan and Bin Deng contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

View original image Download original image

Abstract

Achieving synergy between mechanical and biological performance has long been a challenge in developing silicon nitride (Si3N4) as a bone regeneration implant material. In this study, a nanostructured graphene-toughened Si3N4 composite (Si3N4–G) was prepared, and the mechanical and biological properties of the resulting Si3N4–G composite were compared with those of Si3N4 ceramics without graphene addition. The incorporation of nanostructured graphene substantially improves the mechanical properties of Si3N4. Furthermore, the nanoscale thickness of graphene enhances antibacterial activity through a “cutting” effect, while its high specific surface area promotes cell adhesion, activating mechanosensitive pathways linked to osteogenic differentiation. This work provides new insights into the potential applications of Si3N4-based bio-ceramics in bone tissue engineering.

References

[1]

Pezzotti G, Marin E, Adachi T, et al. Bioactive silicon nitride: A new therapeutic material for osteoarthropathy. Sci Rep 2017, 7: 44848.

[2]
Wang ZY, Li L, Deng B, et al. Research progress of silicon nitride-based human implanted materials. Adv Ceram 2019, 40 : 135–149. (in Chinese).
[3]

Pezzotti G. Silicon nitride: A bioceramic with a gift. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2019, 11: 26619–26636.

[4]

Pezzotti G, Bock RM, McEntire BJ, et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of oxide and non-oxide bioceramics for arthroplastic devices: I. In situ time-lapse Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 2018, 143: 3708–3721.

[5]

Li JS, Yu QP, Li D, et al. Formation of hierarchical Si3N4 foams by protein-based gelcasting and chemical vapor infiltration. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 187–193.

[6]

Xu SS, Zhou XN, Zhi Q, et al. Anisotropic, biomorphic cellular Si3N4 ceramics with directional well-aligned nanowhisker arrays based on wood-mimetic architectures. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 656–664.

[7]

Krstic Z, Krstic VD. Silicon nitride: The engineering material of the future. J Mater Sci 2012, 47: 535–552.

[8]

Sun Y, Meng QC, Jia DC, et al. Effect of hexagonal BN on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Si3N4 ceramics. J Mater Process Tech 2007, 182: 134–138.

[9]

Li YF, Liu P, Wang XD, et al. Interface structure and formation mechanism of BN/intergranular amorphous phase in pressureless sintered Si3N4/BN composites. Scripta Mater 2010, 63: 185–188.

[10]

Hu HL, Yao DX, Xia YF, et al. Fabrication and mechanical properties of SiC reinforced reaction-bonded silicon nitride based ceramics. Ceram Int 2014, 40: 4739–4743.

[11]

Zheng DH, Li XQ, Tang Y, et al. WC–Si3N4 composites prepared by two-step spark plasma sintering. Int J Refract Met H 2015, 50: 133–139.

[12]

Cho J, Boccaccini AR, Shaffer MSP. Ceramic matrix composites containing carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci 2009, 44: 1934–1951.

[13]

Wolfrum AK, Quitzke C, Matthey B, et al. Wear behavior of diamond–silicon nitride composites sintered with FAST/SPS. Wear 2018, 396: 172–181.

[14]

Moya JS, Lopez-Esteban S, Pecharromán C. The challenge of ceramic/metal microcomposites and nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 2007, 52: 1017–1090.

[15]

Wu J, Liu YJ, Zhang H, et al. Silicon nitride as a potential candidate for dental implants: Osteogenic activities and antibacterial properties. J Mater Res 2021, 36: 1866–1882.

[16]

Gorth DJ, Puckett S, Ercan B, et al. Decreased bacteria activity on Si3N4 surfaces compared with PEEK or titanium. Int J Nanomed 2012, 7: 4829–4840.

[17]

Bock RM, Jones EN, Ray DA, et al. Bacteriostatic behavior of surface modulated silicon nitride in comparison to polyetheretherketone and titanium. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017, 105: 1521–1534.

[18]

Ishikawa M, de Mesy Bentley KL, McEntire BJ, et al. Surface topography of silicon nitride affects antimicrobial and osseointegrative properties of tibial implants in a murine model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017, 105: 3413–3421.

[19]

Pezzotti G, Bock RM, McEntire BJ, et al. Silicon nitride bioceramics induce chemically driven lysis in porphyromonas gingivalis. Langmuir 2016, 32: 3024–3035.

[20]

Bozkurt D, Akarsu MK, Akin I, et al. Phase analysis, mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity of graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced silicon nitride-calcium phosphate composites. J Asian Ceram Soc 2021, 9: 471–486.

[21]

Liu ZY, Fu S, Liu XM, et al. Small size, big impact: Recent progress in bottom-up synthesized nanographenes for optoelectronic and energy applications. Adv Sci 2022, 9: 2106055.

[22]

Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, et al. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39: 228–240.

[23]

Szabó T, Berkesi O, Forgó P, et al. Evolution of surface functional groups in a series of progressively oxidized graphite oxides. Chem Mater 2006, 18: 2740–2749.

[24]

Gao W, Alemany LB, Ci LJ, et al. New insights into the structure and reduction of graphite oxide. Nat Chem 2009, 1: 403–408.

[25]

Zhang YP, Li DL, Tan XJ, et al. High quality graphene sheets from graphene oxide by hot-pressing. Carbon 2013, 54: 143–148.

[26]

Pham VTH, Truong VK, Quinn MDJ, et al. Graphene induces formation of pores that kill spherical and rod-shaped bacteria. ACS Nano 2015, 9: 8458–8467.

[27]

Mohammed H, Kumar A, Bekyarova E, et al. Antimicrobial mechanisms and effectiveness of graphene and graphene-functionalized biomaterials. A scope review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020, 8: 465.

[28]

Luong-Van EK, Madanagopal TT, Rosa V. Mechanisms of graphene influence on cell differentiation. Mater Today Chem 2020, 16: 100250.

[29]

Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Esfandiar A. Wrapping bacteria by graphene nanosheets for isolation from environment, reactivation by sonication, and inactivation by near-infrared irradiation. J Phys Chem B 2011, 115: 6279–6288.

[30]

Pandit S, Cao ZJ, Mokkapati VRSS, et al. Vertically aligned graphene coating is bactericidal and prevents the formation of bacterial biofilms. Adv Mater Interfaces 2018, 5: 1701331.

[31]

Gurunathan S, Han JW, Dayem AA, et al. Oxidative stress-mediated antibacterial activity of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Nanomed 2012, 7: 5901–5914.

[32]

West JD, Marnett LJ. Endogenous reactive intermediates as modulators of cell signaling and cell death. Chem Res Toxicol 2006, 19: 173–194.

[33]

Lee WC, Lim CH, Shi H, et al. Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 7334–7341.

[34]

Daneshmandi L, Barajaa M, Tahmasbi Rad A, et al. Graphene-based biomaterials for bone regenerative engineering: A comprehensive review of the field and considerations regarding biocompatibility and biodegradation. Adv Healthc Mater 2021, 10: e2001414.

Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Article number: 9221026
Cite this article:
Zhan Z, Deng B, Chen Y, et al. Synergistic improvement of the mechanical and biological performance of Si3N4 by incorporating nanostructured graphene. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2025, 14(2): 9221026. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2024.9221026
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return