Ultra durable composite steam electrode with cube-shaped BaZr0.85Y0.15O3−δ facet-boosted efficiency toward advanced protonic ceramic electrolysis cells
), Graphical Abstract
Abstract
Protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs) have attracted significant interest because of their efficiency and environmental sustainability in energy conversion. However, their commercial application is hindered by the absence of effective and robust electrodes capable of operating in harsh environments, such as those characterized by high vapor or CO2 concentrations. In this study, we developed a stable steam electrode composed of PrBaMn2O5+δ (PBM) and the durable proton conductor BaZr0.85Y0.15O3−δ (BZY), which was enhanced with the deposition of PrOx nano-catalysts. The composite electrode exhibited a low polarization resistance (~0.34 Ω·cm² at 600 °C), comparable to that of conventional cobalt-based electrodes. Additionally, extensive testing over hundreds of hours under severe conditions revealed exceptional durability, with no significant degradation observed. Notably, the electrode composited with cube-shaped BZY microcrystals and PBM showed a higher proton conductivity of 2.15×10−5 S·cm−¹ at 500 °C, representing an entire order of magnitude greater than that of the electrode composited with irregular nanosized BZY. In addition, the single cell achieved a superior electrolysis current of 2.0 A·cm−2 at 700 °C and 1.3 V. These findings demonstrate the superiority of constructing an innovative interface between the mixed ionic‒electronic conductor (MIEC) and the proton conductor. Our work presents a promising strategy for designing durable steam electrodes for PCECs through a rational compositing approach.
Keywords
Electronic Supplementary Material
References
Hauch A, Küngas R, Blennow P, et al. Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis. Science 2020, 370: eaba6118.
Ghamarinia M, Babaei A, Zamani C, et al. Application of the distribution of relaxation time method in electrochemical analysis of the air electrodes in the SOFC/SOEC devices: A review. Chem Eng J Adv 2023, 15: 100503.
Jiang YN, Chen FL, Xia CR. A review on cathode processes and materials for electro-reduction of carbon dioxide in solid oxide electrolysis cells. J Power Sources 2021, 493: 229713.
Yin YR, Xiao DD, Wu S, et al. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance. SusMat 2023, 3: 697–708.
Lei LB, Zhang JH, Yuan ZH, et al. Progress report on proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells. Adv Funct Mater 2019, 29: 1903805.
Wang YK, Ling YQ, Wang B, et al. A review of progress in proton ceramic electrochemical cells: Material and structural design, coupled with value-added chemical production. Energy Environ Sci 2023, 16: 5721–5770.
Medvedev D. Trends in research and development of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 2019, 44: 26711–26740.
Kasyanova AV, Zvonareva IA, Tarasova NA, et al. Electrolyte materials for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: Main limitations and potential solutions. Mater Rep Energy 2022, 2: 100158.
Liu YY, Luo J, Li C, et al. BaCe0.8Fe0.1Ni0.1O3− δ -impregnated Ni-GDC by phase-inversion as an anode of solid oxide fuel cells with on-cell dry methane reforming. J Adv Ceram 2024, 13: 834–841.
Liu F, Ding D, Duan CC. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for synthesizing sustainable chemicals and fuels. Adv Sci 2023, 10: 2206478.
Wang QJ, Ricote S, Chen M. Oxygen electrodes for protonic ceramic cells. Electrochim Acta 2023, 446: 142101.
Tarutin AP, Filonova EA, Ricote S, et al. Chemical design of oxygen electrodes for solid oxide electrochemical cells: A guide. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2023, 57: 103185.
Wu L, Sun JQ, Qi HY, et al. Boosting steam tolerance and electrochemical performance of an La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3− δ -based air electrode for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 2024, 12: 25979–25987.
Lin Y, Ran R, Zheng Y, et al. Evaluation of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− δ as a potential cathode for an anode-supported proton-conducting solid-oxide fuel cell. J Power Sources 2008, 180: 15–22.
Zhou W, Ran R, Shao ZP. Progress in understanding and development of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− δ -based cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells: A review. J Power Sources 2009, 192: 231–246.
Wei B, Lü Z, Li SY, et al. Thermal and electrical properties of new cathode material Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− δ for solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2005, 8: A428.
Chen KF, Yang HR, Chen ZY, et al. Enabling stable operation of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− δ based multiphase nanocomposite cathode for efficient intermedium temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram Int 2024, 50: 46822–46830.
Jing JM, Lei Z, Xue YH, et al. Constructing highly active and durable oxygen electrode by nanoengineering for reversible protonic ceramic cell. Energy Storage Mater 2024, 72: 103694.
Wei B, Zhe L, Huang XQ, et al. Synthesis, electrical and electrochemical properties of Ba0.5Sr0.5Zn0.2Fe0.8O3− δ perovskite oxide for IT-SOFC cathode. J Power Sources 2008, 176: 1–8.
Wang QJ, Tong XF, Ricote S, et al. Nano-LaCoO3 infiltrated BaZr0.8Y0.2O3−δ electrodes for steam splitting in protonic ceramic electrolysis cells. Adv Powder Mater 2022, 1: 100003.
Wang QJ, Ricote S, Wang Y, et al. Ba0.5Gd0.8La0.7Co2O6− δ infiltrated BaZr0.8Y0.2O3− δ composite oxygen electrodes for protonic ceramic cells. J Electrochem Soc 2022, 169: 014513.
Abdullah Umer M, Cheng CY, Lai BR, et al. Growth of Gd0.3Ca2.7Co3.82Cu0.18O9– δ –BaCe0.6Zr0.2Y0.2O3− δ bulk heterojunction cathode interlayer by pulsed laser deposition for enhancing protonic solid oxide fuel cell performance. Appl Surf Sci 2023, 638: 158139.
Ding HP, Wu W, Jiang C, et al. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat Commun 2020, 11: 1907.
Park K, Saqib M, Lee H, et al. Water-mediated exsolution of nanoparticles in alkali metal-doped perovskite structured triple-conducting oxygen electrocatalysts for reversible cells. Energy Environ Sci 2024, 17: 1175–1188.
Duan CC, Kee R, Zhu HY, et al. Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production. Nat Energy 2019, 4: 230–240.
Dai HL, Boulfrad S, Chu XR, et al. La0.5− x Sc x Sr0.5MnO3− δ cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Taking advantage of the secondary phase. J Adv Ceram 2024, 13: 1759–1770.
Li YF, Xu YS, Yin YR, et al. Entropy engineering design of high-performing lithiated oxide cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 2017–2031.
Zhou R, Yin YR, Dai HL, et al. Attempted preparation of La0.5Ba0.5MnO3− δ leading to an in situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 1189–1200.
Tarutina LR, Gordeeva MA, Matkin DE, et al. Why do BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3− δ -derived complex oxides become one of the most promising electrodes for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. An explanatory review. Chem Eng J 2024, 490: 151615.
Chen X, Yu N, Song YF, et al. Synergistic bulk and surface engineering for expeditious and durable reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells air electrode. Adv Mater 2024, 36: 2403998.
Liu F, Deng H, Diercks D, et al. Lowering the operating temperature of protonic ceramic electrochemical cells to < 450 °C. Nat Energy 2023, 8: 1145–1157.
Zhou YC, Liu EZ, Chen Y, et al. An active and robust air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett 2021, 6: 1511–1520.
Chen KF, Jiang SP. Surface segregation in solid oxide cell oxygen electrodes: Phenomena, mitigation strategies and electrochemical properties. Electrochem Energy Rev 2020, 3: 730–765.
Dai HL, Du HZ, Boulfrad S, et al. Manipulating Nb-doped SrFeO3− δ with excellent performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2024, 13: 579–589.
Yin YR, Zhou YB, Gu YY, et al. Successful preparation of BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3− δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 587–597.
Yin YR, Zhang SQ, Wang A, et al. Rational design of PrBaFe2O6− δ -based cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2024, 13: 1600–1610.
Yu ZX, Ge L, Ni Q, et al. Superior durability and activity of a benchmark triple-conducting cathode by tuning thermo–mechanical compatibility for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Adv Funct Mater 2024, 34: 2309698.
Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan DQ, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature 2021, 591: 246–251.
Hua B, Yan N, Li M, et al. Anode-engineered protonic ceramic fuel cell with excellent performance and fuel compatibility. Adv Mater 2016, 28: 8922–8926.
Pang SL, Xu J, Su YJ, et al. The role of A-site cation size mismatch in tune the catalytic activity and durability of double perovskite oxides. Appl Catal B—Environ 2020, 270: 118868.
Sengodan S, Choi S, Jun A, et al. Layered oxygen-deficient double perovskite as an efficient and stable anode for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. Nat Mater 2015, 14: 205–209.
Gu YH, Zhang YL, Zheng YF, et al. PrBaMn2O5+ δ with praseodymium oxide nanocatalyst as electrode for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. Appl Catal B—Environ 2019, 257: 117868.
Ge L, Sun KQ, Gu YH, et al. Boosting the performance of conventional air electrodes for solid oxide cells by in situ loading of nano praseodymium oxide. Energy Convers Manag 2021, 249: 114873.
Sun KQ, Yu ZX, Ni Q, et al. Highly durable Sr-doped LaMnO3-based cathode modified with Pr6O11 nano-catalyst for protonic ceramic fuel cells based on Y-doped BaZrO3 electrolyte. J Eur Ceram Soc 2022, 42: 4266–4274.
Nam S, Kim J, Kim H, et al. Revitalizing oxygen reduction reactivity of composite oxide electrodes via electrochemically deposited PrO x nanocatalysts. Adv Mater 2024, 36: 2307286.
Ge L, Jiao JH, zhu ZC, et al. A facile method to fabricate proton-conducting BaZr0.85Y0.15O3− δ electrolyte with a large grain size and high conductivity. Ceram Int 2019, 45: 24946–24952.
Jiao JH, Li Q, Gu YH, et al. Effect of BaOB2O3 composite sintering aid on sinterability and electrical property of BaZr0.85Y0.15O3− δ ceramic. Ceram Int 2019, 45: 13679–13684.
Miruszewski T, Dzierzgowski K, Winiarz P, et al. Hebb–Wagner polarization method for determining the oxygen ion conductivity in barium cerate-zirconate. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 7218–7227.
Miruszewski T, Strandbakke R, Dzierzgowski K, et al. A modified DC Hebb–Wagner polarization method for determining the partial protonic electrical conductivity in mixed-conducting BaGd0.3La0.7Co2O6− δ . J Mater Chem A 2024, 12: 13488–13497.
Yu XL, Zhou XK, Wu BZ, et al. Two birds with one stone: Benefits of sintering additives on sinterability and electrical property of new protonic ceramic fuel cell electrolyte SrSn0.8Sc0.2O3− δ . Ceram Int 2024, 50: 40216–40225.
Jiang LL, Han DL. Protonic and electronic hole conductivity of grain interior and grain boundaries in BaZr0.9Y0.1O3− δ : Effect from sample processing. Chem Eng J 2024, 486: 150309.
Huang Y, Qiu RM, Lian WC, et al. Review: Measurement of partial electrical conductivities and transport numbers of mixed ionic-electronic conducting oxides. J Power Sources 2022, 528: 231201.
Guo H, Li YF, Jiang LL, et al. Transport properties of the Ba(Zr,Ce,Y,Yb)O3− δ proton conductor: The real role of co-substitution of Y and Yb. J Mater Chem A 2024, 12: 5875–5884.
Riedl C, Schmid A, Nenning A, et al. Outstanding oxygen reduction kinetics of La0.6Sr0.4FeO3− δ surfaces decorated with platinum nanoparticles. J Electrochem Soc 2020, 167: 104514.
Chen CC, Fu LJ, Maier J. Synergistic, ultrafast mass storage and removal in artificial mixed conductors. Nature 2016, 536: 159–164.
Chen SH, Chen CC. Space charge effects in mixed ionic-electronic conducting electrodes for solid-state batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2024, 26: 24689–24698.
Chen CC, Maier J. Space charge storage in composites: Thermodynamics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2017, 19: 6379–6396.
Seong A, Jeong D, Kim M, et al. Performance comparison of composite cathode: Mixed ionic and electronic conductor and triple ionic and electronic conductor with BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3− δ for highly efficient protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Power Sources 2022, 530: 231241.
Li WY, Guan B, Ma L, et al. High performing triple-conductive Pr2NiO4+ δ anode for proton-conducting steam solid oxide electrolysis cell. J Mater Chem A 2018, 6: 18057–18066.
Bai H, Zhang YH, Chu JM, et al. Oxygen electrode PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+ δ –BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3− δ with different composite proportions for proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2023, 15: 38581–38591.
Liu ZQ, Tang ZJ, Song YF, et al. High-entropy perovskite oxide: A new opportunity for developing highly active and durable air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Nano–Micro Lett 2022, 14: 217.
Wang XY, Fei MJ, Zhou C, et al. Enhanced proton conductivity and CO2-tolerance of intermediate-temperature protonic ceramic fuel cell with lanthanum tungstate-based composite cathode. Compos Part B—Eng 2023, 253: 110565.
Zhou YC, Zhang WL, Kane N, et al. An efficient bifunctional air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Adv Funct Mater 2021, 31: 2105386.
Niu YH, Zhou YC, Zhang WL, et al. Highly active and durable air electrodes for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells enabled by an efficient bifunctional catalyst. Adv Energy Mater 2022, 12: 2103783.
Lee H, Jung H, Kim C, et al. Enhanced electrochemical performance and durability of the BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3− δ composite cathode of protonic ceramic fuel cells via forming nickel oxide nanoparticles. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2021, 4: 11564–11573.
Lei LB, Tao ZT, Wang XM, et al. Intermediate-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells with thin proton-conducting electrolyte and a robust air electrode. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 22945–22951.
Wang Z, Xiao YC, Zhang Y, et al. A novel chemical composite strategy for synergistically enhancing the activity and stability of strontium-containing air electrode for protonic ceramic cells. Chem Eng J 2024, 490: 151911.
Jing JM, Lei Z, Zheng ZW, et al. Triple conducting perovskite Ba0.95La0.05Fe0.8Zn0.2O3− δ as oxygen electrode for reversible protonic ceramic cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 2023, 48: 9037–9045.
Tang W, Ding HP, Bian WJ, et al. Understanding of A-site deficiency in layered perovskites: Promotion of dual reaction kinetics for water oxidation and oxygen reduction in protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 14600–14608.
京公网安备11010802044758号