AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (25.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Tracking footprint of hydrogeology research in China via scientific projects funded by the NSFC (1997–2013)

Yuan-zheng ZHAI1,2( )Yan LEI1,2Jin-sheng WANG1,2Yan-guo TENG1,2
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Engineering Research Centre for Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing 100875, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to track the footprint of the hydrogeology research in China during the past years, all the projects with the code of D0213 (hydrogeology, geothermic geosciences included) funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) from 1997 to 2013 were searched and analysed. The statistics results showed that, a total of 88 institutes were ever funded with a total of 462 projects with the gross amount of 214 million yuan, and Beijing and Wuhan were the two most important centres for the hydrogeology research. In detail, A few 211 Project & 985 Project universities were the main forces, followed by Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences and Chinese Academy of Sciences. Apart from the several traditional geological universities/colleges (China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Nanjing University, Jilin University, and Chang’an University) with outstanding performances, a few new forces from 211 Project & 985 Project universities also made good achievements with Beijing Normal University and Peking University standing out. Generally speaking, the focused scientific issues and related technologies included that but were not limited to, (1) Mechanism, control and remediation of groundwater/soil pollution were the most active fields, (2) Flow dynamics in saturated/unsaturated zone was still an interested topic, (3) Groundwater in hydrological cycle in different scales under climate change and human activities developed very quickly, (4) Engineering problems and disasters associated with groundwater aroused enormous attention,(5) Numerical modeling was still the most important means with wide application, and (6) Environmental tracing was a very active technique and new tracers were found and tried frequently.

References

 
Beijing Normal University, Beijing, http://www.bnu.edu.cn.
 
Chang’an University, Xi’an, http://www.xahu.edu.cn.
 
China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, http://www.cugb.edu.cn.
 
Jilin University, Changchun, http://www.jlu.edu.cn.
 
Nanjing University, Nanjing, http://www.nju.edu.cn.
 
The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), Shijiazhuang, http://www.iheg.org.cn.
 
University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, http://www.cug.edu.cn.
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 61-70
Cite this article:
ZHAI Y-z, LEI Y, WANG J-s, et al. Tracking footprint of hydrogeology research in China via scientific projects funded by the NSFC (1997–2013). Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2014, 2(3): 61-70. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2014.9280032

318

Views

7

Downloads

1

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Published: 28 September 2014
© 2014 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office
Return